7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cauda Equina Syndrome in Neurosarcoidosis

      case-report
      1 , , 2 , 1 , 3
      ,
      Cureus
      Cureus
      neurosarcoidosis, cauda equina, immunosuppressive therapy

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a mimicker of many infectious, neoplastic, and inflammatory diseases. It most commonly involves the cranial nerves followed by meninges, ventricles, hypothalamic-pituitary axis, spinal cord, and brainstem/cerebellum. While NS myelopathy has been increasingly recognized, pathophysiological/prognostic and management principles in NS-mediated cauda equina (CE) and conus medullaris (CM) syndromes, which constitute a small and rare minority of this subset, remain elusive. We present the case of a 49 -year-old Hispanic man who developed a peripheral facial palsy and primary hypogonadism within a span of 12 months and eventually got diagnosed with NS after he presented with CE syndrome. We also performed an extensive literature review, with a discussion on the underlying pathophysiology and current management recommendations for NS-mediated CE/CM syndrome. CE/CM syndromes in a middle-aged man should prompt the consideration of NS as a possible differential diagnosis. While steroid responsive, the majority of NS-CE/CM patients are left with residual neurodeficits with quick relapses when steroids are tapered, making the case for early institution of immunosuppressive therapies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Definition and Consensus Diagnostic Criteria for Neurosarcoidosis

          The Neurosarcoidosis Consortium Consensus Group, an expert panel of physicians experienced in the management of patients with sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis, engaged in an iterative process to define neurosarcoidosis and develop a practical diagnostic approach to patients with suspected neurosarcoidosis. This panel aimed to develop a consensus clinical definition of neurosarcoidosis to enhance the clinical care of patients with suspected neurosarcoidosis and to encourage standardization of research initiatives that address this disease.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Clinical features, treatment and outcome in neurosarcoidosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background Neurosarcoidosis is a rare variant of sarcoidosis and is only described in small cohort studies. We define clinical features, treatment and outcome of patients with neurosarcoidosis over the last 35 years. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on neurosarcoidosis published between 1980 and 2016. Studies were included if they reported at least 5 cases. Studies describing one specific neurological presentation were excluded. Results We identified 29 articles describing 1088 patients diagnosed between 1965 and 2015. Neurosarcoidosis occurred in 5% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Mean age at presentation was 43 years and neurological symptoms were the first clinical manifestation of sarcoidosis in 52%. The most commonly reported feature of neurosarcoidosis was cranial neuropathy in 55%, with the facial and optic nerve most commonly affected, followed by headache in 32%. Pleiocytosis and elevated CSF protein were found in 58 and 63%. MRI of the brain showed abnormalities in 70%. Chest X-ray, chest CT, or gallium-67-scintigraphy showed findings consistent with sarcoidosis in 60%, 70% and 69%, respectively. First line therapy with corticosteroids was initiated in 434 of 539 patients (81%). Second and third line therapy was started in 27 and 9%. Outcome consisted of complete remission in 27%, incomplete remission in 32%, stable disease in 24%, deterioration in 6% and death in 5%. Conclusion Neurosarcoidosis has a heterogeneous clinical presentation and the diagnosis can be difficult because of low sensitivity of ancillary investigations. New treatments have emerged, but nevertheless one third of patients do not respond to treatment. Prospective cohort studies and RCTs on treatment are urgently needed. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-016-0741-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of Prognostic Factors and Immunosuppressive Treatment With Long-term Outcomes in Neurosarcoidosis

              This cohort study identifies prognostic factors for immunosuppressive treatment in patients with neurosarcoidosis and assesses the association of such treatment with relapse of the disease. Question What are the prognostic factors in neurosarcoidosis, and what is the association of immunosuppressive treatment with relapse of the disease? Findings In this cohort study of 234 patients with neurosarcoidosis, encephalic and peripheral nervous system involvement were associated with worsening of the functional score. Immunosuppressive therapies, (ie, intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate sodium, and infliximab) in these patients are associated with lower relapse rates. Meaning The presence of encephalic or peripheral nervous system involvement in neurosarcoidosis should affect the decision to use immunosuppressive therapies to help lower relapse rates. Importance Prognostic factors are lacking in neurosarcoidosis (NS), and the association of immunosuppressive treatments with outcomes are unclear. Objectives To identify prognostic factors of and analyze the association of immunosuppressive treatment with relapse of NS. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective study, a cohort of 234 patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for NS in a tertiary referral center in Paris, France, from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 2015. The median follow-up was 8 years (range, 2 months to 23 years). Main Outcomes and Measures All neurologic and extraneurologic data and treatments were analyzed. Functional outcomes measured by the absolute value and the variation from baseline of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at 60 months after the diagnosis, overall survival, and relapse-free survival (RFS) were assessed. Analyses were stratified by the period of NS diagnosis (1990-1999 vs 2000-2015). Results The 234 patients undergoing assessment included 117 women (50.0%) and 117 men (50.0%); median age was 42 years (interquartile range, 32-53 years). The probable 10-year survival rate was 89% (95% CI, 84%-94%). Older age (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 years, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.19-2.27; P  = .003), peripheral nervous system involvement (HR, 6.75; 95% CI, 2.31-19.7; P  < .001), and higher baseline EDSS score (HR per point, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; P  = .005) were associated with mortality. The estimated 10-year RFS rate was 14% (95% CI, 9%-22%) for all relapses and 28% (95% CI, 20%-38%) for neurologic relapses. Encephalic involvement was associated with shorter neurologic RFS (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.44-3.83; P  < .001). A lower risk for relapse was associated with cyclophosphamide (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11-0.59; P  = .001), methotrexate sodium (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.87; P  = .02), and infliximab (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.02-1.24; P  = .08) treatments. Follow-up was greater than 60 months in 160 patients (68.4%). An elevated baseline EDSS score (odds ratio [OR] per point, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.55-2.37; P  < .001), tobacco use (OR, 3.64; 95% CI, 1.36-9.73; P  = .01), encephalic symptoms (OR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.11-8.38; P  = .03), and less than 4 extraneurologic sarcoidosis localizations (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.04-8.98; P  = .04) were associated with an EDSS value of at least 2.5 at 60 months. Encephalic involvement (16 of 17 patients [94.1%]; P  = .008) and peripheral nervous system involvement (5 of 17 patients [29.4%]; P  = .03) were associated with worsening of the EDSS score at 60 months. Conclusions and Relevance This study identifies putative factors affecting morbidity and mortality in patients with NS. Immunosuppressive therapies (ie, intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and infliximab) in these patients may be associated with lower relapse rates.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                27 August 2020
                August 2020
                : 12
                : 8
                : e10069
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Neurology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
                [2 ] Neurology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA
                [3 ] Neurology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.10069
                7522054
                1e491d50-07b8-4534-8ddb-16d4c25a0775
                Copyright © 2020, Topiwala et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 June 2020
                : 27 August 2020
                Categories
                Neurology
                Pathology
                Rheumatology

                neurosarcoidosis,cauda equina,immunosuppressive therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article