5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      For submission information please click on this link: https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/service/for-journal-authors

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Lifespan Theory of Mind : A Call for Broader Perspectives and More Integration

      editorial
      1 ,
      Zeitschrift für Psychologie
      Hogrefe Publishing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?

          An individual has a theory of mind if he imputes mental states to himself and others. A system of inferences of this kind is properly viewed as a theory because such states are not directly observable, and the system can be used to make predictions about the behavior of others. As to the mental states the chimpanzee may infer, consider those inferred by our own species, for example, purpose or intention , as well as knowledge, belief, thinking, doubt, guessing, pretending, liking , and so forth. To determine whether or not the chimpanzee infers states of this kind, we showed an adult chimpanzee a series of videotaped scenes of a human actor struggling with a variety of problems. Some problems were simple, involving inaccessible food – bananas vertically or horizontally out of reach, behind a box, and so forth – as in the original Kohler problems; others were more complex, involving an actor unable to extricate himself from a locked cage, shivering because of a malfunctioning heater, or unable to play a phonograph because it was unplugged. With each videotape the chimpanzee was given several photographs, one a solution to the problem, such as a stick for the inaccessible bananas, a key for the locked up actor, a lit wick for the malfunctioning heater. The chimpanzee's consistent choice of the correct photographs can be understood by assuming that the animal recognized the videotape as representing a problem, understood the actor's purpose, and chose alternatives compatible with that purpose.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception

            H Wimmer (1983)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Do 15-month-old infants understand false beliefs?

              For more than two decades, researchers have argued that young children do not understand mental states such as beliefs. Part of the evidence for this claim comes from preschoolers' failure at verbal tasks that require the understanding that others may hold false beliefs. Here, we used a novel nonverbal task to examine 15-month-old infants' ability to predict an actor's behavior on the basis of her true or false belief about a toy's hiding place. Results were positive, supporting the view that, from a young age, children appeal to mental states--goals, perceptions, and beliefs--to explain the behavior of others.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zfp
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2190-8370
                2151-2604
                March 14, 2018
                2018
                : 226
                : 2 , Topical Issue: Theory of Mind Across the Lifespan
                : 85-86
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Psychology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, BC, Canada
                Author notes
                Daniel M. Bernstein, Department of Psychology, Kwantlen Polytechnic University, 12666 72nd Avenue, Surrey, BC V3W 2M8, Canada, dbernste@ 123456kpu.ca
                Article
                zfp_226_2_85
                10.1027/2151-2604/a000324
                1ead165b-af7b-476d-b9d5-da8458fea81f
                Copyright @ 2018
                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                Psychology, General behavioral science

                Comments

                Comment on this article