87
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    1
    shares

      We invite you to submit your manuscript to APA's open access journal, Technology, Mind, and Behavior.

      Learn more and submit.

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Toward More Effective and Equitable Learning: Identifying Barriers and Solutions for the Future of Online Education

      article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The increased reliance on online education and educational technologies more generally has laid bare the need to more deeply consider how researchers, designers, and educators can improve the quality of technology-mediated learning. To address this need, more than two dozen experts from a variety of fields came together to discuss the challenges that educational technology must address in the immediate future. These experts were tasked with identifying barriers to and potential solutions for delivering high-quality and equitable online and remote education. This article examines the themes and topics that emerged from these discussions and proposes a Collaborative Framework for Accelerating Online Education. This framework highlights the need for rapid experimentation within larger design cycles as well as the coordination and cooperation of multiple stakeholders across all phases of research and development. The themes, topics, and framework that emerged from this work serve as a call to action for innovative approaches to developing and studying online education.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions.

          This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 213 school-based, universal social and emotional learning (SEL) programs involving 270,034 kindergarten through high school students. Compared to controls, SEL participants demonstrated significantly improved social and emotional skills, attitudes, behavior, and academic performance that reflected an 11-percentile-point gain in achievement. School teaching staff successfully conducted SEL programs. The use of 4 recommended practices for developing skills and the presence of implementation problems moderated program outcomes. The findings add to the growing empirical evidence regarding the positive impact of SEL programs. Policy makers, educators, and the public can contribute to healthy development of children by supporting the incorporation of evidence-based SEL programming into standard educational practice. © 2011 The Authors. Child Development © 2011 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An Experimental Application of the DELPHI Method to the Use of Experts

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Attaining Self-Regulation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Technology, Mind, and Behavior
                American Psychological Association
                2689-0208
                March 31, 2022
                : 3
                : 1
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Learning Sciences, Georgia State University
                [2]Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University
                [3]The Learning Agency, Washington, DC, United States
                [4]Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire
                [5]Computer Science Department, Stanford University
                [6]School of Information, University of Michigan
                [7]Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder
                [8]School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology
                [9] Schmidt Futures, New York, New York, United States
                [10]Data Science, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
                [11]Online Learning and Continuing Education, Clark Atlanta University
                [12]XR Association, Washington, DC, United States
                [13]Infinite Campus, Blaine, Minnesota, United States
                [14]Curriculum and Instruction, Howard University
                [15]School of Computing and Information Science, Cornell University
                [16]Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh
                [17]CommonLit, Washington, DC, United States
                [18]Saga Education, Chicago, Illinois, United States
                [19]Department of Psychology, Arizona State University
                [20]Whooo’s Reading, San Diego, California, United States
                [21]Measurement Inc., Durham, North Carolina, United States
                [22]General Assembly, New York, New York, United States
                [23]Human Systems Engineering, Arizona State University
                [24]FineTune Learning, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
                [25]Age of Learning, Inc., Glendale, California, United States
                [26]Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Virginia
                [27]NewSchools Venture Fund, Oakland, California, United States
                [28]Quill, New York, New York, United States
                [29]Department of English, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, United States
                Author notes
                Action Editor: Arthur Graesser was the action editor for this article.
                Acknowledgments: The authors wish to thank Tyesha Ferron (Georgia State University) for her assistance in organizing workshop events.
                Funding: The authors acknowledge National Science Foundation (NSF) No. 2035359 grant “Improving Online Education Through Technology, Research, And Data” that provided financial support for the workshop.
                Disclosures: The authors are compensated by the individual institutions and companies listed in their affiliations.
                [*] Kathryn S. McCarthy, Department of Learning Sciences, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3978, Atlanta, GA 30302, United States Kmccarthy12@gsu.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6277-7005
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-645X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-5035
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-8682
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-5127
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-4012
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-1008
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9478
                Article
                2022-48419-001
                10.1037/tmb0000063
                1f022ecd-67da-4b30-b348-852d20de5357
                © 2022 The Author(s)

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format for noncommercial use provided the original authors and source are credited and a link to the license is included in attribution. No derivative works are permitted under this license.

                History

                Education,Psychology,Vocational technology,Engineering,Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                educational technology,equity,remote learning

                Comments

                Comment on this article