2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Giant cell arteritis with vertebral artery involvement—baseline characteristics and follow-up of a monocentric patient cohort

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vertebral artery (VA) involvement in giant cell arteritis (GCA) has rarely been reported. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, patients’ characteristics, and immunotherapies used in patients with GCA and VA involvement at diagnosis and 1 year follow-up, retrospectively including patients being diagnosed between January 2011 and March 2021 in our department. Clinical features, laboratory data, VA imaging, immunotherapy, and 1 year follow-up data were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were compared to GCA patients without VA involvement. Among all 77 cases with GCA, 29 patients (37.7%) had VA involvement, as diagnosed by imaging and/or clinical signs and symptoms. Gender distribution and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were significantly different in the groups with and without VA involvement, with more women being affected (38/48 patients, 79.2%) and a significantly higher median ESR in patients without VA involvement (62 vs. 46 mm/h; p = 0.012). MRI and/or CT showed vertebrobasilar stroke at GCA diagnosis in 11 cases. 67/77 patients (87.0%) received high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids (GCs) at diagnosis, followed by oral tapering. Six patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX), one with rituximab, and five with tocilizumab (TCZ). 2/5 TCZ patients achieved clinical remission after 1 year, vertebrobasilar stroke within the first year occurred in 2/5 patients. Diagnosis of VA involvement might be underrecognized in GCA patients. VA imaging should be performed in elderly patients with vertebrobasilar stroke presenting with GCA symptoms, not to miss GCA as the etiology of stroke. Efficacy of immunotherapies in GCA with VA affection and long-term outcomes need to be investigated further.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis

            Criteria for the classification of giant cell (temporal) arteritis were developed by comparing 214 patients who had this disease with 593 patients with other forms of vasculitis. For the traditional format classification, 5 criteria were selected: age greater than or equal to 50 years at disease onset, new onset of localized headache, temporal artery tenderness or decreased temporal artery pulse, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (Westergren) greater than or equal to 50 mm/hour, and biopsy sample including an artery, showing necrotizing arteritis, characterized by a predominance of mononuclear cell infiltrates or a granulomatous process with multinucleated giant cells. The presence of 3 or more of these 5 criteria was associated with a sensitivity of 93.5% and a specificity of 91.2%. A classification tree was also constructed using 6 criteria. These criteria were the same as for the traditional format, except that elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate was excluded, and 2 other variables were included: scalp tenderness and claudication of the jaw or tongue or on deglutition. The classification tree was associated with a sensitivity of 95.3% and specificity of 90.7%.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Glucocorticoid therapy in giant cell arteritis: duration and adverse outcomes.

              To evaluate the course of glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and associated adverse events in a population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). We identified 125 Olmsted County residents with GCA diagnosed between 1950 and 1991 and obtained followup information on the 120 patients who were diagnosed antemortem and agreed to participate in this study. Clinical variables, GC doses, and GC adverse events on each patient were recorded. The relationship between GC therapy and the development of adverse events was studied by the Cox and Anderson-Gill proportional hazards models. All patients were treated with GCs and responded rapidly (median initial dosage 60 mg prednisone/day). The dosage was later reduced according to the treating physicians' judgment. The median duration required to reach 7.5 mg/day was 6.5 months and the median duration required to reach 5 mg/day was 7.5 months. Relapses or recurrences occurred in 57 patients. For the 87 patients followed to discontinuation of GC therapy and permanent remission of GCA (median of 22 months), the total median dose of prednisone was 6.47 gm. Adverse events associated with GCs were recorded in 103 (86%) patients and 2 or more events occurred in 70 patients (58%). Age and higher cumulative dose of GCs were associated with the development of adverse GC side effects. GCs are therapeutically effective in GCA and the prednisone dosage was reduced to physiologic levels in three-fourths of the patients within 1 year. However, most patients developed serious adverse side effects related to GCs, indicating that less toxic therapeutic measures are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                26 June 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1188073
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg , Augsburg, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg , Erlangen, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Paolo Immovilli, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Italy

                Reviewed by: Claus Ziegler Simonsen, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Hubert De Boysson, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, France

                *Correspondence: Antonios Bayas, antonios.bayas@ 123456uk-augsburg.de

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2023.1188073
                10331602
                37435161
                1f0685dd-26a1-4af3-9982-273469966f17
                Copyright © 2023 Prünte, Naumann, Christ, Naumann and Bayas.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 March 2023
                : 30 May 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 10, Words: 6164
                Categories
                Neurology
                Brief Research Report
                Custom metadata
                Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology

                Neurology
                giant cell arteritis,vertebral artery,immunotherapy,tocilizumab,imaging
                Neurology
                giant cell arteritis, vertebral artery, immunotherapy, tocilizumab, imaging

                Comments

                Comment on this article