4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Generic and Respiratory-Specific Quality of Life in Non-Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on quality of life appears to be highly underestimated, especially in patients who have not been admitted to the hospital. Therefore, our aim was to assess respiratory-specific quality of life in addition to generic quality of life in former patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 who have never been admitted to the hospital. Members of an online Belgian social support group for patients with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 with persistent complaints, completed an online survey. The five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) were used to assess generic and respiratory-specific quality of life, respectively. Data of 210 non-hospitalized patients (88% women, 45 ± 11 years, 79 ± 17 days after symptom onset) were included in the analyses. Mean EQ-5D index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) score was 0.62 ± 0.19 and 50.71 ± 18.87, respectively, with 40% of the patients demonstrating an EQ-5D index that was below the fifth percentile of normative values, indicating poor generic quality of life. The mean CCQ score was 2.01 ± 0.98 points, while 123 respondents (59%) had a total score ≥1.9 points, indicating poor respiratory-specific quality of life. The correlation between EQ-5D index score/EQ-VAS score and CCQ total score was moderate (r = −0.524 and r = −0.374; both p < 0.001). In conclusion, both generic and respiratory-specific quality of life are affected in non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19, approximately three months after the onset of symptoms. The combined use of the EQ-5D and the CCQ could identify the broad impact of COVID-19 on quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

          Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19

            This case series describes COVID-19 symptoms persisting a mean of 60 days after onset among Italian patients previously discharged from COVID-19 hospitalization.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis

              Introduction An epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) began in December 2019 in China leading to a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging features have been partially characterized in some observational studies. No systematic reviews on COVID-19 have been published to date. Methods We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis, using three databases to assess clinical, laboratory, imaging features, and outcomes of COVID-19 confirmed cases. Observational studies and also case reports, were included, and analyzed separately. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate pooled prevalences and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results 660 articles were retrieved for the time frame (1/1/2020-2/23/2020). After screening, 27 articles were selected for full-text assessment, 19 being finally included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Additionally, 39 case report articles were included and analyzed separately. For 656 patients, fever (88.7%, 95%CI 84.5–92.9%), cough (57.6%, 95%CI 40.8–74.4%) and dyspnea (45.6%, 95%CI 10.9–80.4%) were the most prevalent manifestations. Among the patients, 20.3% (95%CI 10.0–30.6%) required intensive care unit (ICU), 32.8% presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (95%CI 13.7–51.8), 6.2% (95%CI 3.1–9.3) with shock. Some 13.9% (95%CI 6.2–21.5%) of hospitalized patients had fatal outcomes (case fatality rate, CFR). Conclusion COVID-19 brings a huge burden to healthcare facilities, especially in patients with comorbidities. ICU was required for approximately 20% of polymorbid, COVID-19 infected patients and hospitalization was associated with a CFR of >13%. As this virus spreads globally, countries need to urgently prepare human resources, infrastructure and facilities to treat severe COVID-19.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med
                J Clin Med
                jcm
                Journal of Clinical Medicine
                MDPI
                2077-0383
                09 December 2020
                December 2020
                : 9
                : 12
                : 3993
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Research and Development, Ciro, 6085 NM Horn, The Netherlands; Jeannetdelbressine@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (J.M.D.); yvonnegoertz@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (Y.M.J.G.); anoukvaes@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (A.W.V.); felipemachado@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (F.V.C.M.); maarten.vanherck@ 123456uhasselt.be (M.V.H.); reinposthuma@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (R.P.); fritsfranssen@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (F.M.E.F.); daisyjanssen@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (D.J.A.J.); martijnspruit@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (M.A.S.); Sarahwilke@ 123456ciro-horn.nl (S.H.-W.)
                [2 ]Nutrim School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [3 ]Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ]REVAL–Rehabilitation Research Center, BIOMED–Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3500 Diepenbeek, Belgium; chris.burtin@ 123456uhasselt.be
                [5 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands; bartholomeus.spaetgens@ 123456mumc.nl
                [6 ]Lung Foundation Netherlands, 3818 LE Amersfoort, The Netherlands; yvonnespies@ 123456longfonds.nl (Y.S.); hermanvijlbrief@ 123456longfonds.nl (H.V.)
                [7 ]Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Alex.vantHul@ 123456radboudumc.nl
                [8 ]Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: roymeys@ 123456ciro-horn.nl ; Tel.: +31-(0)475-587-602
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4855-530X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-1592
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-7220
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4136-1553
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-6964
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3062-2612
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1633-6356
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-2327
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1827-9869
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3822-7430
                Article
                jcm-09-03993
                10.3390/jcm9123993
                7764406
                33317214
                1f14c84e-ae8d-44ee-b07c-f2380efe98b1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 14 November 2020
                : 07 December 2020
                Categories
                Article

                covid-19,quality of life,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2)

                Comments

                Comment on this article