9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      International Journal of COPD (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on pathophysiological processes underlying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) interventions, patient focused education, and self-management protocols. Sign up for email alerts here.

      39,063 Monthly downloads/views I 2.893 Impact Factor I 5.2 CiteScore I 1.16 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.804 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the Heterogeneity of Risk Factors in the Canadian Population: Results from the Canadian Obstructive Lung Disease (COLD) Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To determine the spirometric-based prevalence of COPD across different regions in Canada and to evaluate the site heterogeneity of risk factors.

          Patients and Methods

          In this cross-sectional, population-based study, random samples of non-institutionalized adults aged ≥40 years were generated by random digit dialling. Participants answered an interviewer-administered questionnaire and performed spirometry before and after bronchodilator administration. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV 1/FVC <0.70 (fixed ratio, FR) and as FEV 1/FVC <5th percentile (lower limits of normal, LLN). Separate logistic regression models were used to compute the risk (adjusted odds ratio, aOR) for COPD. I 2 and Tau 2 analyses were used to evaluate heterogeneity.

          Results

          Out of 5176 (95%) participants, 4893 (47% male with mean age 56.6 years (95% confidence interval, 56.0–57.2)) had spirometry that satisfied ATS criteria. The population prevalence of COPD was 16.2% (95% CI, 14.5–17.8) by FR and 11.2% (95% CI, 9.7–12.6) by LLN. Male predominance in prevalence was shown by FR but not by LLN criteria. Patient characteristics associated with an increased risk of COPD included: age (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.33–1.84); history of physician-diagnosed asthma (OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.42–4.49); and childhood hospitalization for respiratory illness (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.17–2.80). In terms of smoking-related risk factors, current smoking status had the highest odds ratio (OR 3.49; 95% CI 2.55–4.80). Variance in prevalence among sites was significantly reduced by adjusting for risk factors in Tau 2 analyses. Higher odds of exposure for each risk factor was found in more severe COPD, suggesting that a higher risk could be linked to the development of severe disease.

          Conclusion

          This study reports the population prevalence of COPD in nine urban cities which collectively represent the majority of the Canadian population and demonstrates that heterogeneity in prevalence among sites is substantially explained by variation in associated risk factors for COPD.

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standardisation of spirometry.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary

            American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 195(5), 557-582
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019

              Precision medicine is a patient-specific approach that integrates all relevant clinical, genetic and biological information in order to optimise the therapeutic benefit relative to the possibility of side-effects for each individual. Recent clinical trials have shown that higher blood eosinophil counts are associated with a greater efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Blood eosinophil counts are a biomarker with potential to be used in clinical practice, to help target ICS treatment with more precision in COPD patients with a history of exacerbations despite appropriate bronchodilator treatment. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 pharmacological treatment algorithms, based on the ABCD assessment, can be applied relatively easily to treatment-naive individuals at initial presentation. However, their use is more problematic during follow-up in patients who are already on maintenance treatment. There is a need for a different system to guide COPD pharmacological management during follow-up. Recent large randomised controlled trials have provided important new information concerning the therapeutic effects of ICSs and long-acting bronchodilators on exacerbations. The new evidence regarding blood eosinophils and inhaled treatments, and the need to distinguish between initial and follow-up pharmacological management, led to changes in the GOLD pharmacological treatment recommendations. This article explains the evidence and rationale for the GOLD 2019 pharmacological treatment recommendations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                copd
                copd
                International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Dove
                1176-9106
                1178-2005
                12 February 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 305-320
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Pauls Hospital, The University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC, Canada
                [2 ]Research Institute McGill University Health Centre, McGill University , Montreal, Quebec, Canada
                [3 ]The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa , Ottawa, Canada
                [4 ]Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, Canada
                [5 ]Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval , Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
                [6 ]Respiratory Research Centre, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon, Canada
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Queen’s University , Kingston, Canada
                [8 ]Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University , Halifax, Canada
                [9 ]Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University of Toronto , Toronto, Canada
                [10 ]Department of Medicine, University of Calgary (BW) , Alberta, Canada
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Wan C Tan Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia , Rm 166, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C, V6Z 1Y6, CanadaTel +1-604-682-2344 ext 62749Fax +1-604-806-9274 Email wan.tan@hli.ubc.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-7537
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-6643
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-4651
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2498-9859
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9289-3595
                Article
                285338
                10.2147/COPD.S285338
                7886112
                33603357
                1f21e8fa-71e9-49c4-8a1a-f08383902e98
                © 2021 Leung et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 07 October 2020
                : 07 January 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 7, Tables: 10, References: 43, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: the Canadian Respiratory Research Network and the industry partners AstraZeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, and Novartis. Researchers at RI-McGill University Health Centre Montreal and iCAPTURE Centre Vancouver;
                Funded by: the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; CIHR/Rx&D Collaborative Research Program Operating Grants – 93326), the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRQS), and industry partners: Almirall; Merck Nycomed; Pfizer Canada Ltd; and Theratechnologies;
                The Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD; NCT00920348) study is currently funded by the Canadian Respiratory Research Network and the industry partners AstraZeneca Canada Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Canada Ltd, GlaxoSmithKline Canada Ltd, and Novartis. Researchers at RI-McGill University Health Centre Montreal and iCAPTURE Centre Vancouver lead the project. Previous funding partners were the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR; CIHR/Rx&D Collaborative Research Program Operating Grants – 93326), the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec (FRQS), and industry partners: Almirall; Merck Nycomed; Pfizer Canada Ltd; and Theratechnologies. The funding sponsors had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of this manuscript or in the decision to submit this manuscript for publication. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Respiratory medicine
                prevalence,heterogeneity,copd
                Respiratory medicine
                prevalence, heterogeneity, copd

                Comments

                Comment on this article