9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the capacity for conflict and health research in Lebanon: a qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Conflicts pose new challenges for health systems, requiring rapid and practical approaches to meet emerging needs on the ground. Lebanon has been highly influenced by surrounding conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, especially the Syrian crisis. Strengthening research capacity to collect evidence on conflict in the MENA region and beyond is crucial to inform healthcare policy and practice. For targeted capacity strengthening interventions, the main objective of this paper is to present key findings of a needs assessment of conflict and health research in Lebanon. This will support recent efforts to scale up context-specific policies, interventions to strengthen the country’s health system, and research capacity.

          Methods

          The study is based on 30 semi-structured interviews with key informants such as specialist academics, humanitarian workers and public sector officials.

          Results

          Despite being ranked third in the number of publications on biomedical and health research per capita in MENA and in hosting reputable universities which are considered central academic hubs in the region, lack of nationwide research culture, insufficient funding and limited access to data were reported to be major challenges for health researchers in Lebanon. Even with the ongoing efforts, poor impact of research on policy continues to be a persistent gap. Large disparities in research capacities and taught skills were reported between different universities in Lebanon, with a disproportionate emphasis on quantitative over qualitative skills. Most medical students are not trained to conduct research or to practice in conflict settings. Concerns were also expressed regarding the ethics of research conducted, specifically by local non-governmental organizations.

          Recommendations

          To conduct contextualized trainings on research skills with a stronger focus on qualitative approaches, medical practice, and ethical research in conflict. To better involve policymakers in designing research agendas by organizing multiple stakeholder meetings.

          Conclusion

          The study indicates that health research in Lebanon is characterized by considerable strengths in terms of human capital and research capacities of certain universities. However, the Lebanese research infrastructure needs further development in terms of ensuring sustainable funding, providing access to data, teaching qualitative research skills, conducting ethical and multidisciplinary research, and promoting cross-sectoral knowledge transfer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement

          Background Closing the gap between research production and research use is a key challenge for the health research system. Stakeholder engagement is being increasingly promoted across the board by health research funding organisations, and indeed by many researchers themselves, as an important pathway to achieving impact. This opinion piece draws on a study of stakeholder engagement in research and a systematic literature search conducted as part of the study. Main body This paper provides a short conceptualisation of stakeholder engagement, followed by ‘design principles’ that we put forward based on a combination of existing literature and new empirical insights from our recently completed longitudinal study of stakeholder engagement. The design principles for stakeholder engagement are organised into three groups, namely organisational, values and practices. The organisational principles are to clarify the objectives of stakeholder engagement; embed stakeholder engagement in a framework or model of research use; identify the necessary resources for stakeholder engagement; put in place plans for organisational learning and rewarding of effective stakeholder engagement; and to recognise that some stakeholders have the potential to play a key role. The principles relating to values are to foster shared commitment to the values and objectives of stakeholder engagement in the project team; share understanding that stakeholder engagement is often about more than individuals; encourage individual stakeholders and their organisations to value engagement; recognise potential tension between productivity and inclusion; and to generate a shared commitment to sustained and continuous stakeholder engagement. Finally, in terms of practices, the principles suggest that it is important to plan stakeholder engagement activity as part of the research programme of work; build flexibility within the research process to accommodate engagement and the outcomes of engagement; consider how input from stakeholders can be gathered systematically to meet objectives; consider how input from stakeholders can be collated, analysed and used; and to recognise that identification and involvement of stakeholders is an iterative and ongoing process. Conclusion It is anticipated that the principles will be useful in planning stakeholder engagement activity within research programmes and in monitoring and evaluating stakeholder engagement. A next step will be to address the remaining gap in the stakeholder engagement literature concerned with how we assess the impact of stakeholder engagement on research use. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Armed conflicts, 1946-2014

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ne88@aub.edu.lb
                gh30@aub.edu.lb
                anthony.rizk@outlook.com
                ek48@aub.edu.lb
                a.papamichail@qmul.ac.uk
                kristen.meagher@kcl.ac.uk
                abdulkarim.ekzayez@kcl.ac.uk
                ga60@aub.edu.lb
                preeti.patel@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                Confl Health
                Confl Health
                Conflict and Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-1505
                18 August 2020
                18 August 2020
                2020
                : 14
                : 59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.22903.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9801, R4HC-MENA, Conflict Medicine Program, , Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, ; Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
                [2 ]GRID grid.22903.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9801, Hariri School of Nursing, , Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, ; Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
                [3 ]GRID grid.22903.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9801, Conflict Medicine Program, , Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, ; Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
                [4 ]GRID grid.4868.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 1133, School of Politics & International Relations, , Queen Mary University of London, ; London, E1 4NS UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, R4HC-MENA, Conflict and Health Research Group, Department of War Studies, , King’s College London, ; London, WC2R 2LS UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6841-0976
                Article
                304
                10.1186/s13031-020-00304-x
                7432458
                32821269
                206bf68e-50a7-419f-8f5b-f422a72c772b
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 6 May 2020
                : 8 August 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Global Challenges Research Fund
                Award ID: ES/P010962/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Health & Social care
                capacity strengthening,lebanon,research,health,mena,conflict,needs assessment
                Health & Social care
                capacity strengthening, lebanon, research, health, mena, conflict, needs assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article