14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pooled analysis of active cigarette smoking and invasive breast cancer risk in 14 cohort studies

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: The 2014 US Surgeon General’s report noted research gaps necessary to determine a causal relationship between active cigarette smoking and invasive breast cancer risk, including the role of alcohol consumption, timing of exposure, modification by menopausal status and heterogeneity by oestrogen receptor (ER) status.

          Methods: To address these issues, we pooled data from 14 cohort studies contributing 934 681 participants (36 060 invasive breast cancer cases). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

          Results: Smoking duration before first birth was positively associated with risk ( P-value for trend = 2 × 10 –7) with the highest HR for initiation >10 years before first birth (HR = 1.18, CI 1.12–1.24). Effect modification by current alcohol consumption was evident for the association with smoking duration before first birth ( P-value=2×10 –4); compared with never-smoking non-drinkers, initiation >10 years before first birth was associated with risk in every category of alcohol intake, including non-drinkers (HR = 1.15, CI 1.04–1.28) and those who consumed at least three drinks per day (1.85, 1.55–2.21). Associations with smoking before first birth were limited to risk of ER+ breast cancer ( P-value for homogeneity=3×10 –3). Other smoking timing and duration characteristics were associated with risk even after controlling for alcohol, but were not associated with risk in non-drinkers. Effect modification by menopause was not evident.

          Conclusions: Smoking, particularly if initiated before first birth, was modestly associated with ER+ breast cancer risk that was not confounded by amount of adult alcohol intake. Possible links with breast cancer provide additional motivation for young women to not initiate smoking.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Int J Epidemiol
          Int J Epidemiol
          ije
          International Journal of Epidemiology
          Oxford University Press
          0300-5771
          1464-3685
          June 2017
          19 December 2016
          01 June 2018
          : 46
          : 3
          : 881-893
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
          [2 ]Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
          [3 ]Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
          [4 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
          [5 ]Cancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia and Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
          [6 ]Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
          [7 ]Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
          [8 ]Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
          [9 ]Genetic Epidemiology Group, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
          [10 ]Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH/DHHS, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
          [11 ]Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
          [12 ]School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
          [13 ]Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
          [14 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
          [15 ]Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
          [16 ]Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
          [17 ]University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
          [18 ]Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
          [19 ]Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
          [20 ]Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Community, Boston, MA, USA
          [21 ]Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
          [22 ]Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
          [23 ]HealthPartners Institute for Education and Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author. American Cancer Society, 250 Williams Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. E-mail: mia.gaudet@ 123456cancer.org
          Article
          PMC5837778 PMC5837778 5837778 dyw288
          10.1093/ije/dyw288
          5837778
          28031315
          20d01844-9d73-4b5a-bd3b-34cb3c45c0fc
          © The Author 2016; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association
          History
          : 9 September 2016
          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health(NIH) 10.13039/100000002
          Funded by: National Cancer Institute 10.13039/100000054
          Funded by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 10.13039/100000050
          Funded by: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 10.13039/100000066
          Award ID: Z01 ES 049030–11
          Funded by: American Cancer Society 10.13039/100000048
          Funded by: American Cancer Society 10.13039/100000048
          Funded by: NCI 10.13039/100000054
          Award ID: R01 CA39742
          Funded by: Cancer Council Victoria 10.13039/501100000951
          Funded by: NCI 10.13039/100000054
          Award ID: UM1CA176726
          Award ID: P01CA087969–09
          Funded by: NCI 10.13039/100000054
          Award ID: R01 CA050385
          Funded by: NCI 10.13039/100000054
          Award ID: UM1 CA182876
          Award ID: R01 CA144034
          Funded by: Swedish Research Council 10.13039/501100004359
          Funded by: Swedish Research Council 10.13039/501100004359
          Award ID: 521–2011–2955
          Award ID: 2368/10–221
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Award ID: K05-CA154337
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Categories
          Tobacco

          alcohol,breast cancer,tobacco smoking
          alcohol, breast cancer, tobacco smoking

          Comments

          Comment on this article