0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: An Updated Network Meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The treatment landscape for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) continues to expand. This network meta-analysis (NMA) updates a previously conducted NMA to include data from the most recent phase 3 trials to assess the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

          Methods

          Data from recent phase 3 monotherapy trials of lebrikizumab, ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967), were included in the analyses, along with other eligible phase 3/4 randomized placebo-controlled trials for abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib identified through a systemic literature review in Silverberg et al. (Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 12(5):1181–1196, 2022). The proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement ≥ 90% from baseline (EASI-90), EASI improvement ≥ 75% from baseline (EASI-75), ≥ 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥ 4), and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline (IGA 0/1) were evaluated using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

          Results

          The updated NMA analyzed 13 unique placebo-controlled trials involving 7105 patients in 32 arms across 6 targeted therapies. Upadacitinib 30 mg was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary timepoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, generally followed by abrocitinib 200 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, dupilumab 300 mg, and lebrikizumab 250 mg or abrocitinib 100 mg. Baricitinib 2 mg and tralokinumab were generally ranked lower across outcomes.

          Conclusions

          Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD, especially as new treatments continue to emerge. After incorporating recent placebo-controlled phase 3 data of lebrikizumab, upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, and abrocitinib 200 mg remain the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12–16 weeks of therapy in AD. These updated findings can help healthcare providers when creating a patient’s personalized treatment plan.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-023-01000-3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis †

          Summary Background Moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic disease characterized by intense, persistent and debilitating itch, resulting in sleep deprivation, signs of anxiety and depression, impaired quality of life and reduced productivity. The Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was developed and validated as a single‐item, patient‐reported outcome (PRO) of itch severity. Objectives To describe the content validity and psychometric assessment (test–retest reliability, construct validity, known‐groups validity, sensitivity to change) of the Peak Pruritus NRS, and to derive empirically a responder definition to identify adults with a meaningful change in itch. Methods Content validity was assessed through in‐depth patient interviews. Psychometric assessments used data from phase IIb and phase III dupilumab clinical trials and included test–retest reliability, construct validity, known‐groups validity and sensitivity to change in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD. Results Interview participants indicated that the Peak Pruritus NRS was a relevant, clear and comprehensive assessment of itch severity. Peak Pruritus NRS scores showed large, positive correlations with existing PRO measures of itch, and weak or moderate correlations with clinician‐reported measures assessing objective signs of AD. Peak Pruritus NRS score improvements were highly correlated with improvements in other itch PROs, and moderately correlated with improvements in clinician‐reported measures assessing objective signs of AD. The most appropriate threshold for defining a clinically relevant, within‐person response was ≥ 2–4‐point change in the Peak Pruritus NRS. Conclusions The Peak Pruritus NRS is a well‐defined, reliable, sensitive and valid scale for evaluating worst itch intensity in adults with moderate‐to‐severe AD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            What the Eczema Area and Severity Index score tells us about the severity of atopic dermatitis: an interpretability study.

            The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) is an investigator-assessed instrument measuring the severity of clinical signs in atopic dermatitis (AD). The EASI was identified as one of the best-validated outcome measures for AD; however, no previous studies address how to interpret the EASI score for clinical use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and LIBERTY AD SOLO 2)

              Two phase 3 trials with identical design, LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 (NCT02277743) and LIBERTY AD SOLO 2 (NCT02277769), confirmed dupilumab efficacy and safety versus placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jonathanisilverberg@gmail.com
                Journal
                Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
                Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)
                Dermatology and Therapy
                Springer Healthcare (Cheshire )
                2193-8210
                2190-9172
                1 September 2023
                1 September 2023
                October 2023
                : 13
                : 10
                : 2247-2264
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, ( https://ror.org/00y4zzh67) 2150 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Ste 2B-425, Washington, DC 20037 USA
                [2 ]Department of Dermatology and Skin Science, University of British Columbia, ( https://ror.org/03rmrcq20) Vancouver, BC Canada
                [3 ]Probity Medical Research, ( https://ror.org/0222df516) Surrey, BC Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.431072.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0572 4227, AbbVie Inc., ; North Chicago, IL USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.518759.7, Medicus Economics LLC, ; Boston, MA USA
                [6 ]Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, ( https://ror.org/03taz7m60) Los Angeles, CA USA
                Article
                1000
                10.1007/s13555-023-01000-3
                10539231
                37658223
                21308535-80b4-4f71-b1ab-31e7969993c6
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 June 2023
                : 2 August 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006483, AbbVie;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2023

                Dermatology
                atopic dermatitis,easi,iga,network meta-analysis,pruritus nrs
                Dermatology
                atopic dermatitis, easi, iga, network meta-analysis, pruritus nrs

                Comments

                Comment on this article