10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      FOODLIT-PRO: Food Literacy Domains, Influential Factors and Determinants—A Qualitative Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Poor eating habits are increasing the prevalence of weight-related issues, such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Given the demand to improve individuals’ food knowledge and competencies aiming at healthier behaviours, the current investigation explores the concept of food literacy. Considering the lack of a shared understanding of food literacy, this study aims to explore food literacy’s domains, influential factors and determinants. Using a qualitative deductive-dominant content analysis, 30 experts from food-related fields were interviewed. The obtained outcomes were compared to available food literacy frameworks. Agreement among inter-raters was nearly perfect (k = 0.82). Yielding a total of 184 codes nested within 19 categories, identified domains were Origin, Safety, Choice and Decision, Select and Acquire, Plan, Preserve, Prepare, Cook, and Knowledge; influential factors included Nutrition, Psychological, Health, Learning Contexts, Policy, Industry, Sustainability, and Social and Cultural; External determinants were “Access to Food-Related Information”, “Perishable and/or Unreliable Food-Related Information”, “Family Dynamic and/or Identity”, and “Professionals’ Unpreparedness on Food-Related Expertise”, and Internal determinants included “Prioritise Food”, “Convenience and Practicality”, “Time and Financial Management”, “Previous Food-Related Habits”, and “Innate and Learned Flavour Preferences”. In conclusion, more than half of the identified attributes (62.5%) are corroborated by the current literature. However, the manifested content unmatched with the current frameworks of food literacy literature express food-literacy-related fields of action, knowledge, competencies, and determinants that have not yet been explored. As such, this study provides new and useful information concerning food literacy definition and development, by identifying its domains, factors of influence, and potential determinants. Moreover, this work paves the way for new measurements and interventions within this field.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of agricultural production systems, agricultural input efficiency, and food choice

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis

            Background Healthy children achieve better educational outcomes which, in turn, are associated with improved health later in life. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools (HPS) framework is a holistic approach to promoting health and educational attainment in school. The effectiveness of this approach has not yet been rigorously reviewed. Methods We searched 20 health, education and social science databases, and trials registries and relevant websites in 2011 and 2013. We included cluster randomised controlled trials. Participants were children and young people aged four to 18 years attending schools/colleges. HPS interventions had to include the following three elements: input into the curriculum; changes to the school’s ethos or environment; and engagement with families and/or local communities. Two reviewers identified relevant trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We grouped studies according to the health topic(s) targeted. Where data permitted, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. Results We identified 67 eligible trials tackling a range of health issues. Few studies included any academic/attendance outcomes. We found positive average intervention effects for: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, physical fitness, fruit and vegetable intake, tobacco use, and being bullied. Intervention effects were generally small. On average across studies, we found little evidence of effectiveness for zBMI (BMI, standardized for age and gender), and no evidence for fat intake, alcohol use, drug use, mental health, violence and bullying others. It was not possible to meta-analyse data on other health outcomes due to lack of data. Methodological limitations were identified including reliance on self-reported data, lack of long-term follow-up, and high attrition rates. Conclusion This Cochrane review has found the WHO HPS framework is effective at improving some aspects of student health. The effects are small but potentially important at a population level.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Nutrients
                Nutrients
                nutrients
                Nutrients
                MDPI
                2072-6643
                27 December 2019
                January 2020
                : 12
                : 1
                : 88
                Affiliations
                [1 ]WJCR-William James Center for Research, ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal; filipa_pimenta@ 123456ispa.pt (F.P.); ileal@ 123456ispa.pt (I.L.)
                [2 ]Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany; ralf.schwarzer@ 123456fu-berlin.de
                [3 ]Department of Clinical, Health, and Rehabilitation Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 53-238 Wroclaw, Poland
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: rrosas@ 123456ispa.pt ; Tel.: +351-918-483-078
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-4393
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-7912
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0069-3826
                Article
                nutrients-12-00088
                10.3390/nu12010088
                7019603
                31892245
                218d55bf-84c9-4bb2-9d53-f7118e110b43
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 November 2019
                : 24 December 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                food literacy,qualitative,definition,influential factors,determinants
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                food literacy, qualitative, definition, influential factors, determinants

                Comments

                Comment on this article