12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Broiler stress responses to light intensity, flooring type, and leg weakness as assessed by heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios, serum corticosterone, infrared thermography, and latency to lie

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stress and leg weakness are detrimental to broiler production, health, and welfare. Traditional methods to evaluate stress may be stressful to the bird because they are invasive and require handling and restraint. Two studies examined the effects of light intensity and flooring on the following in broilers: 1) traditional methods for assessing stress using heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and serum corticosterone ( CORT) concentrations, 2) noninvasive measures of stress from infrared thermography ( IRT) eye and beak surface temperatures, and 3) latency-to-lie ( LTL) test times of birds tested individually and in groups of 5. Day-of-hatch male broiler chicks were placed into 6 pens (N = 120 chicks/pen). At 1 wk, pens were allocated to 3 light intensity treatments (2, 5, or 10 lux). At 4 wk, half of the birds from each pen were moved to a pen with wire flooring and the same light intensity. At 1, 4, 5, and 8 wk, blood samples were collected and IRT images of the heads of 5 clinically healthy broilers from each pen were captured. In study 2, IRT images of the heads of birds that became lame in the wire flooring pens were taken. There were no treatment effects on the LTL times of birds tested in groups or individually ( P > 0.05). On day 56 in study 1, birds on wire flooring had elevated heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and CORT concentrations ( P ≤ 0.002) and depressed IRT eye and beak temperatures ( P < 0.0001). In both studies, there were negative correlations between CORT concentrations and IRT beak surface temperatures ( P < 0.05). Lame birds had lower IRT eye and beak surface temperatures than sound birds ( P ≤ 0.004), and the IRT beak surface temperatures of lame birds were lower than their eye surface temperatures ( P = 0.004) in study 2. These studies indicate that the IRT surface temperatures of the eye, and more distinctly of the beak, can be used as sensitive noninvasive indicators of stress.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density.

          Intensive broiler (meat) chicken production now exceeds 800 million birds each year in the United Kingdom and 2 x 10(10) birds worldwide, but it attracts accusations of poor welfare. The European Union is currently adopting standards for broilers aimed at a chief welfare concern--namely, overcrowding--by limiting maximum 'stocking density' (bird weight per unit area). It is not clear, however, whether this will genuinely improve bird welfare because evidence is contradictory. Here we report on broiler welfare in relation to the European Union proposals through a large-scale study (2.7 million birds) with the unprecedented cooperation of ten major broiler producers in an experimental manipulation of stocking density under a range of commercial conditions. Producer companies stocked birds to five different final densities, but otherwise followed company practice, which we recorded in addition to temperature, humidity, litter and air quality. We assessed welfare through mortality, physiology, behaviour and health, with an emphasis on leg health and walking ability. Our results show that differences among producers in the environment that they provide for chickens have more impact on welfare than has stocking density itself.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare.

            Measuring HPA axis activity is the standard approach to the study of stress and welfare in farm animals. Although the reference technique is the use of blood plasma to measure glucocorticoid hormones (cortisol or corticosterone), several alternative methods such as the measurement of corticosteroids in saliva, urine or faeces have been developed to overcome the stress induced by blood sampling itself. In chronic stress situations, as is frequently the case in studies about farm animal welfare, hormonal secretions are usually unchanged but dynamic testing allows the demonstration of functional changes at several levels of the system, including the sensitization of the adrenal cortex to ACTH and the resistance of the axis to feedback inhibition by corticosteroids (dexamethasone suppression test). Beyond these procedural aspects, the main pitfall in the use of HPA axis activity is in the interpretation of experimental data. The large variability of the system has to be taken into consideration, since corticosteroid hormone secretion is usually pulsatile, follows diurnal and seasonal rhythms, is influenced by feed intake and environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, age and physiological state, just to cite the main sources of variation. The corresponding changes reflect the important role of glucocorticoid hormones in a number of basic physiological processes such as energy metabolism and central nervous system functioning. Furthermore, large differences have been found across species, breeds and individuals, which reflect the contribution of genetic factors and environmental influences, especially during development, in HPA axis functioning. Usually, these results will be integrated with data from behavioral observation, production and pathology records in a comprehensive approach of farm animal welfare.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Biology of stress in poultry with emphasis on glucocorticoids and the heterophil to lymphocyte ratio.

              The biology of stress in chickens is reviewed. Not only is stress associated with depressed production, but animal welfare influences consumer acceptance of poultry and eggs. The reciprocal of well-being is stress. The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in poultry consists of the neuropeptides, corticotropin releasing hormone, and arginine vasotocin that are released from the median eminence; the polypeptide hormone, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secreted by the anterior pituitary gland; and the glucocorticoid hormone, corticosterone (CORT), synthesized by the adrenocortical cells. Many, but not all, stresses in chickens increase circulating concentrations of CORT. Circulating concentrations levels of CORT (both basal and in response to stressors) show marked differences in the literature, suggesting further attention is needed to ensure assays are validated for CORT in chicken plasma and other sources - excreta and feathers. As glucocorticoids influence the heterophil:lymphocyte (H:L) ratio, it is not surprising that the H:L is shifted with stress. It is recommended that close attention needs to be placed on the validity of assays including cross-laboratory standards. In addition, there is a strong case for determining multiple parameters of stress.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Poult Sci
                Poult Sci
                Poultry Science
                Elsevier
                0032-5791
                1525-3171
                15 April 2020
                July 2020
                15 April 2020
                : 99
                : 7
                : 3301-3311
                Affiliations
                []Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
                []Agricultural Statistics Lab, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
                []Office of Animal Welfare, Tyson Foods, Springdale, AR 72762, USA
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding author: slweimer@ 123456umd.edu
                Article
                S0032-5791(20)30188-7
                10.1016/j.psj.2020.03.028
                7597826
                32616223
                21c8050e-b18f-403f-82cf-67ee2a6730e5
                © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Poultry Science Association Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 October 2019
                : 16 March 2020
                Categories
                Animal Well-Being and Behavior

                infrared thermography,wire flooring,light intensity,stress,latency to lie

                Comments

                Comment on this article