7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety intensity in patients with burns: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to examine the effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety intensity in patients with burns. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in various international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as ‘Massage therapy’, ‘Musculoskeletal manipulations’, ‘Acute pains’, ‘Burning pain’, and ‘Burn’ from the earliest to October 17, 2022. Cochran's tool is used to check the risk of bias for randomised clinical trial (RCT) articles. The methodological index for non‐randomised studies was used to assess the risk of bias in quasi‐experimental studies. STATA version 14 software was used to perform the meta‐analysis. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine statistical significance. Heterogeneity was investigated with I 2. A P‐value less than .1 was considered statistically significant for publication bias value. A total of 733 patients with burns were included in seven studies. Five studies had an RCT design and two studies had a quasi‐experimental design. The duration of the study was reported in five studies, with a mean of 42.40 weeks. The duration of the intervention was reported in seven studies with a mean of 22.86 minutes. The results of the meta‐analysis showed using various types of massage therapy interventions significantly reduced pain intensity in the intervention group compared with the control group (weighted mean difference: −2.08, 95% CI: −2.55 to −1.62, Z = 8.77, I 2: 67.1%, P < .001). Massage therapy intervention significantly reduced the intensity of anxiety in burn patients (standard mean difference: −7.07, 95% CI: −10.13 to −4.01, Z = 4.53, I 2: 98.2, P < .001). Overall, the present systematic review and meta‐analysis showed that massage therapy can reduce the intensity of pain and anxiety in burn patients. Therefore, it is recommended that health managers and policymakers pay special attention to massage therapy as a simple, low‐cost, and efficient non‐pharmacological treatment to relieve pain and anxiety in burn patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references71

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

              Because of specific methodological difficulties in conducting randomized trials, surgical research remains dependent predominantly on observational or non-randomized studies. Few validated instruments are available to determine the methodological quality of such studies either from the reader's perspective or for the purpose of meta-analysis. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate such an instrument. After an initial conceptualization phase of a methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS), a list of 12 potential items was sent to 100 experts from different surgical specialties for evaluation and was also assessed by 10 clinical methodologists. Subsequent testing involved the assessment of inter-reviewer agreement, test-retest reliability at 2 months, internal consistency reliability and external validity. The final version of MINORS contained 12 items, the first eight being specifically for non-comparative studies. Reliability was established on the basis of good inter-reviewer agreement, high test-retest reliability by the kappa-coefficient and good internal consistency by a high Cronbach's alpha-coefficient. External validity was established in terms of the ability of MINORS to identify excellent trials. MINORS is a valid instrument designed to assess the methodological quality of non-randomized surgical studies, whether comparative or non-comparative. The next step will be to determine its external validity when used in a large number of studies and to compare it with other existing instruments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ramyarfarzan@yahoo.com
                sami.karkhah@yahoo.com
                Journal
                Int Wound J
                Int Wound J
                10.1111/(ISSN)1742-481X
                IWJ
                International Wound Journal
                Blackwell Publishing Ltd (Oxford, UK )
                1742-4801
                1742-481X
                21 January 2023
                August 2023
                : 20
                : 6 ( doiID: 10.1111/iwj.v20.6 )
                : 2440-2458
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Corrective Exercise and Sport Injury, Faculty of Sport Sciences University of Guilan Rasht Iran
                [ 2 ] Department of Nursing Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences Esfarayen Iran
                [ 3 ] Burn and Regenerative Medicine Research Center Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 4 ] Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 5 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery Golestan University of Medical Sciences Gorgan Iran
                [ 6 ] Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 7 ] Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                [ 8 ] Department of Medical‐Surgical Nursing, Nasibeh School of Nursing and Midwifery Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences Sari Iran
                [ 9 ] School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Community, and Education Mount Royal University Calgary Alberta Canada
                [ 10 ] Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, School of Medicine Guilan University of Medical Sciences Rasht Iran
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ramyar Farzan, MD and Samad Karkhah, MSc, Nursing and Midwifery School of Shahid Dr Beheshti, Hamidyan Shahrak, Shahid Dr Beheshti Ave., Rasht, Gilan, Iran.

                Email: ramyarfarzan@ 123456yahoo.com and sami.karkhah@ 123456yahoo.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-9176
                Article
                IWJ14089
                10.1111/iwj.14089
                10333016
                36680488
                23216f84-b470-4ae6-b61d-418850abf342
                © 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 06 January 2023
                : 23 December 2022
                : 07 January 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 3, Pages: 19, Words: 8596
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.1 mode:remove_FC converted:10.07.2023

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                anxiety,burns,massage,massage therapy,pain
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                anxiety, burns, massage, massage therapy, pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article