182
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Influence of Free Radicals Signal from Dental Resins on the Radio-Induced Signal in Teeth in EPR Retrospective Dosimetry

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In case of radiological accident, retrospective dosimetry is needed to reconstruct the absorbed dose of overexposed individuals not wearing personal dosimeters at the onset of the incident. In such a situation, emergency mass triage will be required. In this context, it has been shown that Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy would be a rapid and sensitive method, on the field deployable system, allowing dose evaluation of a great number of people in a short time period. This methodology uses tooth enamel as a natural dosimeter. Ionising radiations create stable free radicals in the enamel, in a dose dependent manner, which can be detected by EPR directly in the mouth with an appropriate resonator. Teeth are often subject to restorations, currently made of synthetic dimethacrylate-based photopolymerizable composites. It is known that some dental composites give an EPR signal which is likely to interfere with the dosimetric signal from the enamel. So far, no information was available about the occurrence of this signal in the various composites available on the market, the magnitude of the signal compared to the dosimetric signal, nor its evolution with time. In this study, we conducted a systematic characterization of the signal (intensity, kinetics, interference with dosimetric signal) on 19 most widely used composites for tooth restoration, and on 14 experimental resins made with the most characteristic monomers found in commercial composites. Although a strong EPR signal was observed in every material, a rapid decay of the signal was noted. Six months after the polymerization, the signal was negligible in most composites compared to a 3 Gy dosimetric signal in a tooth. In some cases, a stable atypical signal was observed, which was still interfering with the dosimetric signal.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials.

          Composite dental restorations represent a unique class of biomaterials with severe restrictions on biocompatibility, curing behavior, esthetics, and ultimate material properties. These materials are presently limited by shrinkage and polymerization-induced shrinkage stress, limited toughness, the presence of unreacted monomer that remains following the polymerization, and several other factors. Fortunately, these materials have been the focus of a great deal of research in recent years with the goal of improving restoration performance by changing the initiation system, monomers, and fillers and their coupling agents, and by developing novel polymerization strategies. Here, we review the general characteristics of the polymerization reaction and recent approaches that have been taken to improve composite restorative performance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins.

            Polydimethacrylate resins were prepared by photopolymerization of Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA or Bis-EMA (4) monomer, initiated by camphoroquinone/N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate system. The study of physical properties of these resins showed that TEGDMA seems to create the most dense polymer network, which however is the most flexible (0.74GPa), absorbs the highest amount of water (6.33 wt%) and releases the lowest amount of unreacted monomer (2.41 microg/mm(3)). UDMA and Bis-EMA (4) create more rigid networks, which absorb lower water and release higher unreacted monomer than TEGDMA. Bis-EMA (4) absorbs the lowest water amount (1.79 wt%) and releases the highest amount of unreacted monomer (14.21 microg/mm(3)). Bis-GMA leads to the formation of the most rigid network (1.43 GPa), which absorbs lower water than the resin made by TEGDMA but higher than the resin made by UDMA and Bis-EMA (4). Copolymers of Bis-GMA with the other monomers were also prepared, using various monomer combinations and molar ratios. Copolymers Bis-GMA/TEGDMA (50/50 and 70/30 wt%) showed significantly higher values for Young's modulus (1.83 and 1.78 GPa) than those predicted by the linear dependence of the values on the copolymer composition. Gradual replacement of TEGDMA with UDMA or/and Bis-EMA (4) in copolymerization with Bis-GMA resulted in more flexible resins with lower water sorption and higher solubility values, depending on the TEGDMA content.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures.

              The current focus on networking and mutual assistance in the management of radiation accidents or incidents has demonstrated the importance of a joined-up approach in physical and biological dosimetry. To this end, the European Radiation Dosimetry Working Group 10 on 'Retrospective Dosimetry' has been set up by individuals from a wide range of disciplines across Europe. Here, established and emerging dosimetry methods are reviewed, which can be used immediately and retrospectively following external ionising radiation exposure. Endpoints and assays include dicentrics, translocations, premature chromosome condensation, micronuclei, somatic mutations, gene expression, electron paramagnetic resonance, thermoluminescence, optically stimulated luminescence, neutron activation, haematology, protein biomarkers and analytical dose reconstruction. Individual characteristics of these techniques, their limitations and potential for further development are reviewed, and their usefulness in specific exposure scenarios is discussed. Whilst no single technique fulfils the criteria of an ideal dosemeter, an integrated approach using multiple techniques tailored to the exposure scenario can cover most requirements.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2013
                21 May 2013
                : 8
                : 5
                : e62225
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ]Center for Research and Engineering on Biomaterials CRIBIO, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences, Bio- and Soft- Matter, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
                [4 ]School of Dentistry and Stomatology, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
                University of Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PL CD SB JL GL BG. Performed the experiments: PL CD AMDS SB JL. Analyzed the data: PL CD AMDS SB JL GL BG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PL CD AMDS SB JL. Wrote the paper: PL CD AMDS SB JL GL BG.

                Article
                PONE-D-13-01393
                10.1371/journal.pone.0062225
                3660527
                23704875
                23a51ce6-b457-4d6b-8b19-45ccdcb2671e
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 4 January 2013
                : 19 March 2013
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                The project was supported by The National Institutes of Health, grant number U19AI091173. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Biophysics
                Radiation Biophysics
                Chemistry
                Applied Chemistry
                Chemical Radicals
                Medicine
                Oral Medicine
                Dentistry
                Radiology
                Physics
                Biophysics
                Radiation Biophysics
                Radiation Exposure
                Radioprotection
                Electromagnetic Radiation
                Gamma Rays
                Interdisciplinary Physics
                Medical Physics
                Nuclear Physics
                Radiometry

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article