28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Lithic technological responses to Late Pleistocene glacial cycling at Pinnacle Point Site 5-6, South Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are multiple hypotheses for human responses to glacial cycling in the Late Pleistocene, including changes in population size, interconnectedness, and mobility. Lithic technological analysis informs us of human responses to environmental change because lithic assemblage characteristics are a reflection of raw material transport, reduction, and discard behaviors that depend on hunter-gatherer social and economic decisions. Pinnacle Point Site 5–6 (PP5-6), Western Cape, South Africa is an ideal locality for examining the influence of glacial cycling on early modern human behaviors because it preserves a long sequence spanning marine isotope stages (MIS) 5, 4, and 3 and is associated with robust records of paleoenvironmental change. The analysis presented here addresses the question, what, if any, lithic assemblage traits at PP5-6 represent changing behavioral responses to the MIS 5-4-3 interglacial-glacial cycle? It statistically evaluates changes in 93 traits with no a priori assumptions about which traits may significantly associate with MIS. In contrast to other studies that claim that there is little relationship between broad-scale patterns of climate change and lithic technology, we identified the following characteristics that are associated with MIS 4: increased use of quartz, increased evidence for outcrop sources of quartzite and silcrete, increased evidence for earlier stages of reduction in silcrete, evidence for increased flaking efficiency in all raw material types, and changes in tool types and function for silcrete. Based on these results, we suggest that foragers responded to MIS 4 glacial environmental conditions at PP5-6 with increased population or group sizes, ‘place provisioning’, longer and/or more intense site occupations, and decreased residential mobility. Several other traits, including silcrete frequency, do not exhibit an association with MIS. Backed pieces, once they appear in the PP5-6 record during MIS 4, persist through MIS 3. Changing paleoenvironments explain some, but not all temporal technological variability at PP5-6.

          Related collections

          Most cited references166

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Willow Smoke and Dogs' Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior.

            The origins of modern human behavior are marked by increased symbolic and technological complexity in the archaeological record. In western Eurasia this transition, the Upper Paleolithic, occurred about 45,000 years ago, but many of its features appear transiently in southern Africa about 45,000 years earlier. We show that demography is a major determinant in the maintenance of cultural complexity and that variation in regional subpopulation density and/or migratory activity results in spatial structuring of cultural skill accumulation. Genetic estimates of regional population size over time show that densities in early Upper Paleolithic Europe were similar to those in sub-Saharan Africa when modern behavior first appeared. Demographic factors can thus explain geographic variation in the timing of the first appearance of modern behavior without invoking increased cognitive capacity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stratigraphic placement and age of modern humans from Kibish, Ethiopia.

              In 1967 the Kibish Formation in southern Ethiopia yielded hominid cranial remains identified as early anatomically modern humans, assigned to Homo sapiens. However, the provenance and age of the fossils have been much debated. Here we confirm that the Omo I and Omo II hominid fossils are from similar stratigraphic levels in Member I of the Kibish Formation, despite the view that Omo I is more modern in appearance than Omo II. 40Ar/39Ar ages on feldspar crystals from pumice clasts within a tuff in Member I below the hominid levels place an older limit of 198 +/- 14 kyr (weighted mean age 196 +/- 2 kyr) on the hominids. A younger age limit of 104 +/- 7 kyr is provided by feldspars from pumice clasts in a Member III tuff. Geological evidence indicates rapid deposition of each member of the Kibish Formation. Isotopic ages on the Kibish Formation correspond to ages of Mediterranean sapropels, which reflect increased flow of the Nile River, and necessarily increased flow of the Omo River. Thus the 40Ar/39Ar age measurements, together with the sapropel correlations, indicate that the hominid fossils have an age close to the older limit. Our preferred estimate of the age of the Kibish hominids is 195 +/- 5 kyr, making them the earliest well-dated anatomically modern humans yet described.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                29 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 3
                : e0174051
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Human Evolution Research Institute, Department of Archaeology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Private Bag, South Africa
                [2 ]Centre for Coastal Paleoscience, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa
                [3 ]Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States of America
                [4 ]Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior, Faculdade das Ciências Humanas e Sociais, Universidade do Algarve, Campus Gambelas, Faro, Portugal
                [5 ]Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America
                Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, GERMANY
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: JW KSB SO TP KLR BJS CWM.

                • Investigation: JW KSB SO TP KLR BJS CWM.

                • Writing – original draft: JW.

                • Writing – review & editing: SO TP KLR BJS CWM.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-107X
                Article
                PONE-D-16-44701
                10.1371/journal.pone.0174051
                5371328
                28355257
                23a64d52-0ae4-4d73-85fe-c373951afabf
                © 2017 Wilkins et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 November 2016
                : 2 March 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 5, Pages: 41
                Funding
                Funding was provided by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada (JW), NORAM and The American-Scandinavian Foundation (SO), Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/73598/2010 (TP), IGERT DGE 0801634 (KLR), the Hyde Family Foundations, Institute of Human Origins, and the National Science Foundation BCS-9912465, BCS-0130713, BCS-0524087, BCS-1138073 (CWM). Marean recognizes the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to the Institute of Human Origins at Arizona State University. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation or any other granting agency. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Physical Sciences
                Materials Science
                Raw Materials
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoanthropology
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoanthropology
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Physical Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physical Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Lithic Technology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoanthropology
                Lithic Technology
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleoanthropology
                Lithic Technology
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Physical Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Lithic Technology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Physical Anthropology
                Paleoanthropology
                Lithic Technology
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Behavior
                Earth Sciences
                Geology
                Geologic Time
                Cenozoic Era
                Quaternary Period
                Pleistocene Epoch
                Social Sciences
                Archaeology
                Archaeological Dating
                Optically Stimulated Luminescence
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Electromagnetic Radiation
                Luminescence
                Optically Stimulated Luminescence
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                Africa
                South Africa
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Limnology
                Paleolimnology
                Paleoenvironments
                Earth Sciences
                Marine and Aquatic Sciences
                Limnology
                Paleolimnology
                Paleoenvironments
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleolimnology
                Paleoenvironments
                Earth Sciences
                Paleontology
                Paleolimnology
                Paleoenvironments
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article