8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Raptor wing morphing with flight speed

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In gliding flight, birds morph their wings and tails to control their flight trajectory and speed. Using high-resolution videogrammetry, we reconstructed accurate and detailed three-dimensional geometries of gliding flights for three raptors (barn owl, Tyto alba; tawny owl, Strix aluco, and goshawk, Accipiter gentilis). Wing shapes were highly repeatable and shoulder actuation was a key component of reconfiguring the overall planform and controlling angle of attack. The three birds shared common spanwise patterns of wing twist, an inverse relationship between twist and peak camber, and held their wings depressed below their shoulder in an anhedral configuration. With increased speed, all three birds tended to reduce camber throughout the wing, and their wings bent in a saddle-shape pattern. A number of morphing features suggest that the coordinated movements of the wing and tail support efficient flight, and that the tail may act to modulate wing camber through indirect aeroelastic control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Review of Morphing Aircraft

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings.

            Gliding birds continually change the shape and size of their wings, presumably to exploit the profound effect of wing morphology on aerodynamic performance. That birds should adjust wing sweep to suit glide speed has been predicted qualitatively by analytical glide models, which extrapolated the wing's performance envelope from aerodynamic theory. Here we describe the aerodynamic and structural performance of actual swift wings, as measured in a wind tunnel, and on this basis build a semi-empirical glide model. By measuring inside and outside swifts' behavioural envelope, we show that choosing the most suitable sweep can halve sink speed or triple turning rate. Extended wings are superior for slow glides and turns; swept wings are superior for fast glides and turns. This superiority is due to better aerodynamic performance-with the exception of fast turns. Swept wings are less effective at generating lift while turning at high speeds, but can bear the extreme loads. Finally, our glide model predicts that cost-effective gliding occurs at speeds of 8-10 m s(-1), whereas agility-related figures of merit peak at 15-25 m s(-1). In fact, swifts spend the night ('roost') in flight at 8-10 m s(-1) (ref. 11), thus our model can explain this choice for a resting behaviour. Morphing not only adjusts birds' wing performance to the task at hand, but could also control the flight of future aircraft.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Animal flight dynamics I. Stability in gliding flight.

              Stability is as essential to flying as lift itself, but previous discussions of how flying animals maintain stability have been limited in both number and scope. By developing the pitching moment equations for gliding animals and by discussing potential sources of roll and yaw stability, we consider the various sources of static stability used by gliding animals. We find that gliding animals differ markedly from aircraft in how they maintain stability. In particular, the pendulum stability provided when the centre of gravity lies below the wings is a much more important source of stability in flying animals than in most conventional aircraft. Drag-based stability also appears to be important for many gliding animals, whereas in aircraft, drag is usually kept to a minimum. One unexpected consequence of these differences is that the golden measure of static pitching stability in aircraft--the static margin--can only strictly be applied to flying animals if the equilibrium angle of attack is specified. We also derive several rules of thumb by which stable fliers can be identified. Stable fliers are expected to exhibit one or more of the following features: (1) Wings that are swept forward in slow flight. (2) Wings that are twisted down at the tips when swept back (wash-out) and twisted up at the tips when swept forwards (wash-in). (3) Additional lifting surfaces (canard, hindwings or a tail) inclined nose-up to the main wing if they lie forward of it, and nose-down if they lie behind it (longitudinal dihedral). Each of these predictions is directional--the opposite is expected to apply in unstable animals. In addition, animals with reduced stability are expected to display direct flight patterns in turbulent conditions, in contrast to the erratic flight patterns predicted for stable animals, in which large restoring forces are generated. Using these predictions, we find that flying animals possess a far higher degree of inherent stability than has generally been recognized. This conclusion is reinforced by measurements of the relative positions of the centres of gravity and lift in birds, which suggest that the wings alone may be sufficient to provide longitudinal static stability. Birds may therefore resemble tailless aircraft more closely than conventional aircraft with a tailplane.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J R Soc Interface
                RSIF
                royinterface
                Journal of the Royal Society Interface
                The Royal Society
                1742-5689
                1742-5662
                July 14, 2021
                July 2021
                July 14, 2021
                : 18
                : 180
                : 20210349
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Structure and Motional Laboratory, Royal Veterinary College, , Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
                [ 2 ]Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol, , Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
                [ 3 ]School of Mechanical Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, , Guangdong, People's Republic of China
                [ 4 ]Interface Analysis Centre, School of Physics, University of Bristol, , Bristol BS8 1TL, UK
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5490620.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-2612
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3132-9824
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4621-9468
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-0427
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-7766
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7175-792X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-4497
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8794-4677
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-0510
                Article
                rsif20210349
                10.1098/rsif.2021.0349
                8277465
                34255986
                24de2acb-f7c8-4243-9c7c-efb3a608c3fe
                © 2021 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : April 28, 2021
                : June 21, 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268;
                Award ID: BB/R002657/1
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440;
                Award ID: 202854/Z/16/Z
                Funded by: H2020 European Research Council, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010663;
                Award ID: 679355
                Funded by: Air Force Office of Scientific Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000181;
                Award ID: FA9550-16-1-0034
                Categories
                1004
                25
                Life Sciences–Physics interface
                Research Articles

                Life sciences
                wing morphing,bird wings,three-dimensional reconstruction,bird aerodynamics
                Life sciences
                wing morphing, bird wings, three-dimensional reconstruction, bird aerodynamics

                Comments

                Comment on this article