For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
9
views
36
references
 Top references
cited by
13
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      285
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract

          The main purpose of this review is to compare and analyze the results of the main PresbyLASIK approaches; central and peripheral.

          Summary

          A comprehensive research was conducted in PUBMED using keywords like “presbyopia correction”, “PresbyLASIK”, “Corneal multifocality”, “Laser blended vision”. We reviewed the PresbyLASIK technique, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and corrected near visual acuity (CNVA), and compared the differences between the techniques.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          The Global Burden of Potential Productivity Loss from Uncorrected Presbyopia.

          Kevin Frick, Susan Joy, David Wilson … (2015)
          The onset of presbyopia in middle adulthood results in potential losses in productivity among otherwise healthy adults if uncorrected or undercorrected. The economic burden could be significant in lower-income countries, where up to 94% of cases may be uncorrected or undercorrected. This study estimates the global burden of potential productivity lost because of uncorrected functional presbyopia.
          Article 0 comments Cited 67 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Complications of cataract surgery.

            O A R Mahroo, D Spalton, Meilin E. Chan (2010)
            Modern cataract surgery is safe in more than 95 per cent of patients. In the small number of cases where a serious complication occurs, the most common is an intra-operative posterior capsular rupture. This can lead to vitreous loss or a dropped nucleus and can increase the risk of post-operative cystoid macular oedema or retinal detachment. Post-operatively, posterior capsular opacification is the most common complication and can be readily treated with a YAG capsulotomy. The most devastating complication is endophthalmitis, the rate of which is now significantly decreased through the use of intracameral antibiotics. As a clinician, the most important step is to assess the patient pre-operatively to predict higher risk individuals and to counsel them appropriately. In these patients, various pre- or intra-operative management steps can be taken in addition to routine phacoemulsification to optimise their visual outcome.
            Article 0 comments Cited 43 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Developments in the correction of presbyopia II: surgical approaches.

              W. Neil Charman (2014)
              To discuss the various static and dynamic surgical approaches which attempt to give presbyopes good vision at far, intermediate and near viewing distances.
              Article 0 comments Cited 37 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Veronica Vargas-Fragoso: jlalio@vissum.com
                Jorge L. Alió: jlalio@vissum.com
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Eye Vis (Lond)
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Eye Vis (Lond)
                Title: Eye and Vision
                Publisher: BioMed Central (London )
                ISSN (Electronic): 2326-0254
                Publication date (Electronic): 13 April 2017
                Publication date PMC-release: 13 April 2017
                Publication date Collection: 2017
                Volume: 4
                Electronic Location Identifier: 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.419256.d, , Vissum Corporation, ; Edificio Vissum, Calle Cabañal 1, Alicante, Spain
                [2 ]GRID grid.26811.3c, Division of Ophthalmology, , Universidad Miguel Hernández, ; Carretera Alicante-Valencia km 8.7, Alicante, Spain
                Article
                Publisher ID: 75
                DOI: 10.1186/s40662-017-0075-9
                PMC ID: 5390462
                SO-VID: 250db538-a79f-4467-b6ad-e22c166e6a45
                Copyright © © The Author(s). 2017
                License:

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Date received : 15 October 2016
                Date accepted : 28 March 2017
                Categories
                Subject: Review
                Custom metadata
                issue-copyright-statement © The Author(s) 2017

                Keywords: central and peripheral presbylasik,corneal multifocality,presbyopia
                Data availability:
                Keywords: central and peripheral presbylasik, corneal multifocality, presbyopia

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content285

                See all similar

                Cited by13

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors265

                See all reference authors