5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Provider and patient perspectives on barriers to buprenorphine adherence and the acceptability of video directly observed therapy to enhance adherence

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Buprenorphine effectively reduces opioid craving and illicit opioid use. However, some patients may not take their medication as prescribed and thus experience suboptimal outcomes. The study aim was to qualitatively explore buprenorphine adherence and the acceptability of utilizing video directly observed therapy (VDOT) among patients and their providers in an office-based program.

          Methods

          Clinical providers (physicians and staff; n = 9) as well as patients ( n = 11) were recruited from an office-based opioid treatment program at an urban academic medical center in the northwestern United States. Using a semi-structured guide, interviewers conducted individual interviews and focus group discussions. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were independently coded to identify key themes related to non-adherence and then jointly reviewed in an iterative fashion to develop a set of content codes.

          Results

          Among providers and patients, perceived reasons for buprenorphine non-adherence generally fell into several thematic categories: social and structural factors that prevented patients from consistently accessing medications or taking them reliably (e.g., homelessness, transportation difficulties, chaotic lifestyles, and mental illness); refraining from taking medication in order to use illicit drugs or divert; and forgetting to take medication, especially in the setting of taking split-doses. Some participants perceived non-adherence to be less of a problem for buprenorphine than for other medications. VDOT was viewed as potentially enhancing patient accountability, leading to more trust from providers who are concerned about diversion. On the other hand, some participants expressed concern that VDOT would place undue burden on patients, which could have the opposite effect of eroding patient-provider trust. Others questioned the clinical indication.

          Conclusions

          Findings suggest potential arenas for enhancing buprenorphine adherence, although structural barriers will likely be most challenging to ameliorate. Providers as well as patients indicated mixed attitudes toward VDOT, suggesting it would need to be thoughtfully implemented.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Treatment retention among patients randomized to buprenorphine/naloxone compared to methadone in a multi-site trial.

          To examine patient and medication characteristics associated with retention and continued illicit opioid use in methadone (MET) versus buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) treatment for opioid dependence. This secondary analysis included 1267 opioid-dependent individuals participating in nine opioid treatment programs between 2006 and 2009 and randomized to receive open-label BUP or MET for 24 weeks. The analyses included measures of patient characteristics at baseline (demographics; use of alcohol, cigarettes and illicit drugs; self-rated mental and physical health), medication dose and urine drug screens during treatment, and treatment completion and days in treatment during the 24-week trial. The treatment completion rate was 74% for MET versus 46% for BUP (P < 0.01); the rate among MET participants increased to 80% when the maximum MET dose reached or exceeded 60 mg/day. With BUP, the completion rate increased linearly with higher doses, reaching 60% with doses of 30-32 mg/day. Of those remaining in treatment, positive opioid urine results were significantly lower [odds ratio (OR) = 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-0.76, P < 0.01] among BUP relative to MET participants during the first 9 weeks of treatment. Higher medication dose was related to lower opiate use, more so among BUP patients. A Cox proportional hazards model revealed factors associated with dropout: (i) BUP [versus MET, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.61, CI = 1.20-2.15], (ii) lower medication dose (<16 mg for BUP, <60 mg for MET; HR = 3.09, CI = 2.19-4.37), (iii) the interaction of dose and treatment condition (those with higher BUP dose were 1.04 times more likely to drop out than those with lower MET dose, and (iv) being younger, Hispanic and using heroin or other substances during treatment. Provision of methadone appears to be associated with better retention in treatment for opioid dependence than buprenorphine, as does use of provision of higher doses of both medications. Provision of buprenorphine is associated with lower continued use of illicit opioids. © 2013 Society for the Study of Addiction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why aren't physicians prescribing more buprenorphine?

            Background & Objective Buprenorphine is an underutilized pharmacotherapy that can play a key role in combating the opioid epidemic. Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) often struggle to find physicians that prescribe buprenorphine. Many physicians do not have the waiver to prescribe buprenorphine, and a large proportion of physicians that are waivered do not prescribe to capacity. This study aimed to quantitatively understand why physicians do not utilize buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD more frequently. Methods Physicians (n=558) with and without the waiver to prescribe buprenorphine were surveyed about perceived drawbacks associated with prescribing buprenorphine. Furthermore, resources were identified that would encourage those without the waiver to obtain it, and those with the waiver to accept more new patients. The survey was distributed online to physicians in the spring/summer of 2016 via the American Society for Addiction Medicine and American Medical Association Listervs. Results and Conclusions A logistic regression analysis was used to identify reasons that respondents indicated no willingness to increase prescribing ( 2 (4) = 73.18, p < .001); main reasons were lack of belief in agonist treatment (or 3.98, 95% CI, 1.43 to 11.1, p = .008), lack of time for additional patients (or 5.54, 95% CI, 3.5 to 8.7, p < .001), and belief that reimbursement rates are insufficient (or 2.50, 95% CI, 1.3 to 4.8, p = .006). Differences between non-waivered and waivered physicians concerning attitudes toward buprenorphine treatment as well as resources that would increase willingness to prescribe are also discussed. Identifying barriers to buprenorphine utilization is crucial in expanding treatment options for individuals with OUD.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Opioid agonist treatments and heroin overdose deaths in Baltimore, Maryland, 1995-2009.

              We examined the association between the expansion of methadone and buprenorphine treatment and the prevalence of heroin overdose deaths in Baltimore, Maryland from 1995 to 2009. We conducted a longitudinal time series analysis of archival data using linear regression with the Newey-West method to correct SEs for heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation, adjusting for average heroin purity. Overdose deaths attributed to heroin ranged from a high of 312 in 1999 to a low of 106 in 2008. While mean heroin purity rose sharply (1995-1999), the increasing number of patients treated with methadone was not associated with a change in the number of overdose deaths, but starting in 2000 expansion of opioid agonist treatment was associated with a decline in overdose deaths. Adjusting for heroin purity and the number of methadone patients, there was a statistically significant inverse relationship between heroin overdose deaths and patients treated with buprenorphine (P = .002). Increased access to opioid agonist treatment was associated with a reduction in heroin overdose deaths. Implementing policies that support evidence-based medication treatment of opiate dependence may decrease heroin overdose deaths.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                godersky@uw.edu
                asaxon@uw.edu
                joem@uw.edu
                jsamet@bu.edu
                jsimoni@uw.edu
                206-744-1835 , tsuij@uw.edu
                Journal
                Addict Sci Clin Pract
                Addict Sci Clin Pract
                Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1940-0632
                1940-0640
                13 March 2019
                13 March 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, , University of Washington, ; 325 9th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0420 6540, GRID grid.413919.7, Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, , VA Puget Sound Health Care System, ; 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2183 6745, GRID grid.239424.a, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, , Boston Medical Center, ; 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000122986657, GRID grid.34477.33, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, , University of Washington, ; 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
                Article
                139
                10.1186/s13722-019-0139-3
                6417248
                30867068
                254c5957-4887-4396-915d-61ccfc4d0cfd
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 17 September 2018
                : 27 February 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000026, National Institute on Drug Abuse;
                Award ID: R44 DA044053
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000060, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases;
                Award ID: AI027757
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Health & Social care
                qualitative research,opioid use disorder,opioid agonist therapy,health technology,adherence

                Comments

                Comment on this article