5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      No benefit for elbow blocking on conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: A 6-month randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          For displaced distal radius fracture, this trial aimed to compare an above-elbow (AE) and below-elbow (BE) cast at the end of a 24-week follow-up using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire as a primary outcome.

          Methods

          This is a clinical trial with parallel groups (1:1) and a blinded evaluator. There are two non-surgical interventions: AE and BE. A total of 128 adult patients with acute (up to 7 days) displaced distal radius fracture of type A2-3, C1-3 by the AO classification were included. The follow-up was 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the DASH questionnaire at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the maintenance of reduction by the evaluation of radiographic parameters, pain measured by VAS, PRWE, objective functional evaluation and rate of adverse effects.

          Results

          The difference between the two groups in the DASH score at 24 weeks was not significant, with the mean (95% CI) DASH score being AE: 9.44 (2.70 to 16.17) vs. BE: 9.88 (3.19 to 16.57) (p = 0.895). The above-elbow group had a significantly greater worsening of the mean DASH score from baseline to 2 weeks (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in any of the other follow-up assessments. Objective functional evaluation, PRWE, radiographical measures and rates of reduction loss were similar between groups. Above-elbow casting resulted in more adverse effects (mostly shoulder pain; 19 events vs. 9 events); RR = 0.39 (0.19–0.94); p = 0.033 at the end of six-month follow-up.

          Conclusions

          This study did not demonstrate a difference between above-elbow and below-elbow cast in terms of DASH outcome at 6 months in non-surgical treatment of deviated distal radius fractures. However, below-elbow casting is less debilitating during the treatment period, has comparable performance in maintaining the reduction, and is related to fewer minor adverse effects than above-elbow casting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references58

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice

          Multiple imputation by chained equations is a flexible and practical approach to handling missing data. We describe the principles of the method and show how to impute categorical and quantitative variables, including skewed variables. We give guidance on how to specify the imputation model and how many imputations are needed. We describe the practical analysis of multiply imputed data, including model building and model checking. We stress the limitations of the method and discuss the possible pitfalls. We illustrate the ideas using a data set in mental health, giving Stata code fragments. 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States.

              The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency and describe the epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. We extracted cases with ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes of 813.0 to 817.1 from the 1998 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. In 1998 there were 1,465,874 estimated cases of hand/forearm fractures, accounting for 1.5% of all emergency department cases. Radius and/or ulna fractures comprised the largest proportion of fractures (44%). The most affected age group was 5 to 14 years of age (26%). Private insurance paid for 49% of the cases. Most of the fractures occurred at home (30%); the street/highway was the second most likely fracture location (14%). Accidental falls caused the majority (47%) of fractures. Large database analysis provides important information that can be used to target interventions toward vulnerable populations and to allocate adequate resources for treating upper extremity fractures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administration
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Project administrationRole: Supervision
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                10 June 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 6
                : e0252667
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Unit of Hand Surgery, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp -EPM), São Paulo, Brazil
                [2 ] Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Municipal Dr. Fernando Mauro Pires da Rocha (Hospital do Campo Limpo), São Paulo, Brazil
                [3 ] Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema–United Health Group, São Paulo, Brazil
                Monash University, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-2236
                Article
                PONE-D-20-32834
                10.1371/journal.pone.0252667
                8191961
                34111160
                258f068e-f970-403f-a540-9d3dd6ef2537
                © 2021 Okamura et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 23 October 2020
                : 18 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 6, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001807, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo;
                Award ID: 2019/04546-4
                Award Recipient :
                JCB (senior author) received the grant. This research was funded by public funding FAPESP -Fundação de Amparao à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, under the number:2019/04546-4 (no COI from industry). http://www.fapesp.br
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Limbs
                Arms
                Wrist
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Limbs
                Arms
                Wrist
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Pain
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Limbs
                Arms
                Elbow
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Body Limbs
                Arms
                Elbow
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Biomechanics
                Hand Strength
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drug Research and Development
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Clinical Trials
                Randomized Controlled Trials
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Disabilities
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Clinical Research Design
                Adverse Events
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article