24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Mortality in Neurofibromatosis 1: An Analysis Using U.S. Death Certificates

      , ,
      The American Journal of Human Genetics
      University of Chicago Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a relatively common autosomal dominant condition, information about its effect on mortality is limited. We used Multiple-Cause Mortality Files, compiled from U.S. death certificates by the National Center for Health Statistics, for 1983 through 1997. We identified 3,770 cases of presumed NF1 among 32,722,122 deaths in the United States, a frequency of 1/8,700, which is one-third to one-half the estimated prevalence. Mean and median ages at death for persons with NF1 were 54.4 and 59 years, respectively, compared with 70.1 and 74 years in the general population. Results of proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) analyses showed that persons with NF1 were 34 times more likely (PMR=34.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 30.8-38.0) to have a malignant connective or other soft-tissue neoplasm listed on their death certificates than were persons without NF1. Overall, persons with NF1 were 1.2 times more likely than expected (PMR=1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.28) to have a malignant neoplasm listed on their death certificates, but the PMR was 6.07 (95% CI 4.88-7.45) for persons who died at 10-19 years of age and was 4.93 (95% CI 4.14-5.82) for those who died at 20-29 years of age. Similarly, vascular disease was recorded more often than expected on death certificates of persons with NF1 who died at <30 years of age (PMR=3.26, 95% CI 1.31-6.71 at age <10 years; PMR=2.68, 95% CI 1.38-4.68 at age 10-19 years; and PMR=2.25, 95% CI 1.46-3.32 at 20-29 years) but not in older persons. This study supports previous findings of decreased life expectancy for persons with NF1 and, within the limitations of death certificates, provides population-based data about NF1 morbidity and mortality that are useful to clinicians caring for patients with NF1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Accuracy of death certificates for coding coronary heart disease as the cause of death.

          Death certificates are widely used in epidemiologic and clinical investigations and for national statistics. To examine the accuracy of death certificates for coding coronary heart disease as the underlying cause of death. Community-based inception cohort followed since 1948. Framingham, Massachusetts. 2683 deceased Framingham Heart Study participants. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the death certificate. The reference standard was cause of death adjudicated by a panel of three physicians. Among 2683 decedents, the death certificate coded coronary heart disease as the underlying cause of death for 942; the physician panel assigned coronary heart disease for 758. The death certificate had a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI, 81.1 % to 86.4%), positive predictive value of 67.4% (CI, 64.4% to 70.4%), specificity of 84.1% (CI, 82.4% to 85.7%), and negative predictive value of 92.9% (CI, 91.7% to 94.1%) for coronary heart disease. The death certificate assigned coronary heart disease in 51.2% of 242 deaths (9.0% of total deaths) for which the physician panel could not determine a cause. Compared with the physician panel, the death certificate attributed 24.3% more deaths to coronary heart disease overall and more than twice as many deaths to coronary heart disease in decedents who were at least 85 years of age. When deaths that were assigned unknown cause by the physician panel were excluded, the death certificate still assigned more deaths to coronary heart disease (7.9% overall and 43.1% in the oldest age group). Coronary heart disease may be overrepresented as a cause of death on death certificates. National mortality statistics, which are based on death certificate data, may overestimate the frequency of coronary heart disease by 7.9% to 24.3% overall and by as much as two-fold in older persons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            NF1 gene and neurofibromatosis 1.

            Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), also known as von Recklinghausen disease, is an autosomal dominant condition caused by mutations of the NF1 gene, which is located at chromosome 17q11.2. NF1 is believed to be completely penetrant, but substantial variability in expression of features occurs. Diagnosis of NF1 is based on established clinical criteria. The presentation of many of the clinical features is age dependent. The average life expectancy of patients with NF1 is probably reduced by 10-15 years, and malignancy is the most common cause of death. The prevalence of clinically diagnosed NF1 ranges from 1/2,000 to 1/5,000 in most population-based studies. A wide variety of NF1 mutations has been found in patients with NF1, but no frequently recurring mutation has been identified. Most studies have not found an obvious relation between particular NF1 mutations and the resulting clinical manifestations. The variability of the NF1 phenotype, even in individuals with the same NF1 gene mutation, suggests that other factors are involved in determining the clinical manifestations, but the nature of these factors has not yet been determined. Laboratory testing for NF1 mutations is difficult. A protein truncation test is commercially available, but its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value have not been established. No general, population-based molecular studies of NF1 mutations have been performed. At this time, it appears that the benefits of population-based screening for clinical features of NF1 would not outweigh the costs of screening.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-term follow-up of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis. Survival and malignant neoplasms.

              To document the natural history of von Recklinghausen neurofibromatosis, we followed up a nationwide cohort of 212 affected patients and families identified in Denmark 42 years ago. We obtained follow-up information on 99 percent. Because all 76 probands were identified through hospitals, they may include a disproportionate number of severe cases of neurofibromatosis. To diminish this effect of selection bias, we distinguished between the probands and their affected relatives. In a comparison with the general population, survival rates were significantly impaired in relatives with neurofibromatosis, worse in probands, and worst in female probands. Malignant neoplasms or benign central nervous system tumors occurred in 45 percent of the probands, giving a relative risk of 4.0 (95 percent confidence limits, 2.8 to 5.6) as compared with expected numbers. Multiple primary neoplasms were found in 15 probands, but only 1 relative. Compared with the general population, male relatives with neurofibromatosis had the same rate of neoplasms, whereas female relatives had a nearly twofold higher rate (relative risk, 1.9; 1.1 to 3.1). Nervous system tumors were disproportionately represented. We conclude that patients with severe neurofibromatosis requiring hospitalization often have a poor prognosis, but incidentally diagnosed relatives may have a considerably better outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                The American Journal of Human Genetics
                The American Journal of Human Genetics
                University of Chicago Press
                00029297
                May 2001
                May 2001
                : 68
                : 5
                : 1110-1118
                Article
                10.1086/320121
                1226092
                11283797
                261e3382-c2f5-4256-b972-f0a7cbf4368d
                © 2001

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                https://www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article