4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Use and impact of point-of-care ultrasonography in general practice: a prospective observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To describe how general practitioners (GPs) use point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and how it influences the diagnostic process and treatment of patients.

          Design

          Prospective observational study using an online questionnaire before and after POCUS.

          Setting

          Office-based general practice.

          Participants

          Twenty GPs consecutively recruited all patients examined with POCUS in 1 month.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          We estimated the use of POCUS through the indication for use, the frequency of use, the time consumption, the extent of modification of the examination and the findings.

          The influence on the diagnostic process was estimated through change in the tentative diagnoses, change in confidence, the ability to produce ultrasound images and the relationship between confidence and organs scanned or tentative diagnoses.

          The influence of POCUS on patient treatment was estimated through change in plan for the patient, change in patient’s treatment and the relationship between such changes and certain findings.

          Results

          The GPs included 574 patients in the study. POCUS was used in patient consultations with a median frequency of 8.6% (IQR: 4.9–12.6). Many different organs were scanned covering more than 100 different tentative diagnoses. The median time taken to perform POCUS was 5 min (IQR: 3–8). Across applications and GPs, POCUS entailed a change in diagnoses in 49.4% of patients; increased confidence in a diagnosis in 89.2% of patients; a change in the management plan for 50.9% of patients including an absolute reduction in intended referrals to secondary care from 49.2% to 25.6%; and a change in treatment for 26.5% of patients.

          Conclusions

          The clinical utilisation of POCUS was highly variable among the GPs included in this study in terms of the indication for performing POCUS, examined scanning modalities and frequency of use. Overall, using POCUS altered the GPs’ diagnostic process and clinical decision-making in nearly three out of four consultations.

          Trial registration number

          NCT03375333.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Point-of-care ultrasonography.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

            When used with standard diagnostic testing, point-of-care ultrasonography might improve the proportion of patients admitted with respiratory symptoms who are correctly diagnosed 4 h after admission to the emergency department. We therefore assessed point-of-care ultrasonography of the heart, lungs, and deep veins in addition to the usual initial diagnostic testing in this patient population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Point-of-Care Ultrasonography for Primary Care Physicians and General Internists.

              Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is a safe and rapidly evolving diagnostic modality that is now utilized by health care professionals from nearly all specialties. Technological advances have improved the portability of equipment, enabling ultrasound imaging to be executed at the bedside and thereby allowing internists to make timely diagnoses and perform ultrasound-guided procedures. We reviewed the literature on the POCUS applications most relevant to the practice of internal medicine. The use of POCUS can immediately narrow differential diagnoses by building on the clinical information revealed by the traditional physical examination and refining clinical decision making for further management. We describe 2 common patient scenarios (heart failure and sepsis) to highlight the impact of POCUS performed by internists on efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, resource utilization, and radiation exposure. Using POCUS to guide procedures has been found to reduce procedure-related complications, along with costs and lengths of stay associated with these complications. Despite several undisputed advantages of POCUS, barriers to implementation must be considered. Most importantly, the utility of POCUS depends on the experience and skills of the operator, which are affected by the availability of training and the cost of ultrasound devices. Additional system barriers include availability of templates for documentation, electronic storage for image archiving, and policies and procedures for quality assurance and billing. Integration of POCUS into the practice of internal medicine is an inevitable change that will empower internists to improve the care of their patients at the bedside.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2020
                17 September 2020
                : 10
                : 9
                : e037664
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentCenter for General Practice , Aalborg University , Aalborg, Denmark
                [2 ]departmentResearch Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [3 ]Primary Health Care Research Unit, Zealand Region , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [4 ]departmentDepartment of Radiology, Radiological Research and Innovation Unit , Odense University Hospital , Odense, Denmark
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Camilla Aakjær Andersen; caakjaer@ 123456dcm.aau.dk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-748X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2162-7390
                Article
                bmjopen-2020-037664
                10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037664
                7500300
                32948563
                264f6668-e4fa-4e89-a568-ea632451df73
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 February 2020
                : 12 June 2020
                : 30 July 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: The Committee of Multipractice Studies in General Practice;
                Award ID: EMN-2017-03249
                Funded by: The Danish Research Foundation for General Practice;
                Categories
                General practice / Family practice
                1506
                1696
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                primary care,ultrasonography,change management,organisation of health services
                Medicine
                primary care, ultrasonography, change management, organisation of health services

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content109

                Cited by17

                Most referenced authors249