32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      In vivo articular cartilage deformation: noninvasive quantification of intratissue strain during joint contact in the human knee

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The in vivo measurement of articular cartilage deformation is essential to understand how mechanical forces distribute throughout the healthy tissue and change over time in the pathologic joint. Displacements or strain may serve as a functional imaging biomarker for healthy, diseased, and repaired tissues, but unfortunately intratissue cartilage deformation in vivo is largely unknown. Here, we directly quantified for the first time deformation patterns through the thickness of tibiofemoral articular cartilage in healthy human volunteers. Magnetic resonance imaging acquisitions were synchronized with physiologically relevant compressive loading and used to visualize and measure regional displacement and strain of tibiofemoral articular cartilage in a sagittal plane. We found that compression (of 1/2 body weight) applied at the foot produced a sliding, rigid-body displacement at the tibiofemoral cartilage interface, that loading generated subject- and gender-specific and regionally complex patterns of intratissue strains, and that dominant cartilage strains (approaching 12%) were in shear. Maximum principle and shear strain measures in the tibia were correlated with body mass index. Our MRI-based approach may accelerate the development of regenerative therapies for diseased or damaged cartilage, which is currently limited by the lack of reliable in vivo methods for noninvasive assessment of functional changes following treatment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces.

          Recent studies suggest that there are multiple regulatory pathways by which chondrocytes in articular cartilage sense and respond to mechanical stimuli, including upstream signaling pathways and mechanisms that may lead to direct changes at the level of transcription, translation, post-translational modifications, and cell-mediated extracellular assembly and degradation of the tissue matrix. This review focuses on the effects of mechanical loading on cartilage and the resulting chondrocyte-mediated biosynthesis, remodeling, degradation, and repair of this tissue. The effects of compression and tissue shear deformation are compared, and approaches to the study of mechanical regulation of gene expression are described. Of particular interest regarding dense connective tissues, recent experiments have shown that mechanotransduction is critically important in vivo in the cell-mediated feedback between physical stimuli, the molecular structure of newly synthesized matrix molecules, and the resulting macroscopic biomechanical properties of the tissue.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics.

            "Tissue engineering" uses implanted cells, scaffolds, DNA, protein, and/or protein fragments to replace or repair injured or diseased tissues and organs. Despite its early success, tissue engineers have faced challenges in repairing or replacing tissues that serve a predominantly biomechanical function. An evolving discipline called "functional tissue engineering" (FTE) seeks to address these challenges. In this paper, the authors present principles of functional tissue engineering that should be addressed when engineering repairs and replacements for load-bearing structures. First, in vivo stress/strain histories need to be measured for a variety of activities. These in vivo data provide mechanical thresholds that tissue repairs/replacements will likely encounter after surgery. Second, the mechanical properties of the native tissues must be established for subfailure and failure conditions. These "baseline data" provide parameters within the expected thresholds for different in vivo activities and beyond these levels if safety factors are to be incorporated. Third, a subset of these mechanical properties must be selected and prioritized. This subset is important, given that the mechanical properties of the designs are not expected to completely duplicate the properties of the native tissues. Fourth, standards must be set when evaluating the repairs/replacements after surgery so as to determine, "how good is good enough?" Some aspects of the repair outcome may be inferior, but other mechanical characteristics of the repairs and replacements might be suitable. New and improved methods must also be developed for assessing the function of engineered tissues. Fifth, the effects of physical factors on cellular activity must be determined in engineered tissues. Knowing these signals may shorten the iterations required to replace a tissue successfully and direct cellular activity and phenotype toward a desired end goal. Finally, to effect a better repair outcome, cell-matrix implants may benefit from being mechanically stimulated using in vitro "bioreactors" prior to implantation. Increasing evidence suggests that mechanical stress, as well as other physical factors, may significantly increase the biosynthetic activity of cells in bioartificial matrices. Incorporating each of these principles of functional tissue engineering should result in safer and more efficacious repairs and replacements for the surgeon and patient.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of biomechanics and inflammation in cartilage injury and repair.

              Osteoarthritis is a painful and debilitating disease characterized by progressive degenerative changes in the articular cartilage and other joint tissues. Biomechanical factors play a critical role in the initiation and progression of this disease, as evidenced by clinical and animal studies of alterations in the mechanical environment of the joint caused by trauma, joint instability, disuse, or obesity. The onset of these changes after joint injury generally has been termed posttraumatic arthritis and can be accelerated by factors such as a displaced articular fracture. Within this context, there is considerable evidence that interactions between biomechanical factors and proinflammatory mediators are involved in the progression of cartilage degeneration in posttraumatic arthritis. In vivo studies have shown increased concentrations of inflammatory cytokines and mediators in the joint in mechanically induced models of osteoarthritis. In vitro explant studies confirm that mechanical load is a potent regulator of matrix metabolism, cell viability, and the production of proinflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2. Knowledge of the interaction of inflammatory and biomechanical factors in regulating cartilage metabolism would be beneficial to an understanding of the etiopathogenesis of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and in the improvement of therapies for joint injury.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group
                2045-2322
                11 January 2016
                2016
                : 6
                : 19220
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN, 47907
                [2 ]School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University , West Lafayette, IN, 47907
                [3 ]Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine , Indianapolis, IN, 46202
                [4 ]Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado , Boulder, CO, 80309.
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                srep19220
                10.1038/srep19220
                4707486
                26752228
                267d96b4-87a6-463d-8e7f-fba83d88e7dc
                Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 12 August 2015
                : 08 December 2015
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article