1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Longer treatment intervals are associated with reduced treatment persistence in neovascular age related macular degeneration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          To test the hypothesis that patients treated for neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD) with longer treatment intervals are more likely to persist with treatment.

          Methods

          Data were obtained from the prospectively-defined Fight Retinal Blindness! registry. Treatment interval at 2 years was stratified based on the mean treatment interval over the three visits prior to and including the 2-year visit. Rates of non-persistence to follow-up were assessed from 2 to 5 years.

          Results

          Data from 1538 eyes were included. The overall rate of non-persistence was 51% at 5 years. Patients on longer treatment intervals (12-weeks) at 2 years were found to be less persistent to long-term follow-up. These eyes were found to have fewer active disease visits in the first 2 years (40%) than eyes treated at 4-weekly intervals (66%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, better vision at 2 years was associated with a lower risk of non-persistence (hazards ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 0.95 [0.93, 0.97], P < 0.001), while longer treatment intervals (HR [95% CI]: 1.31 [0.95, 1.8] and 1.54 [1.15, 2.06] for 12-week and > 12-week intervals vs. 4-week intervals, respectively, P = 0.002) and older patients (HR [95% CI]: 1.03 [1.02, 1.04], p < 0.001) were at higher risk of non-persistence.

          Conclusions

          We found that patients on longer treatment intervals at 2 years were more likely to be non-persistent with treatment in later years. Reinforcing the need for ongoing treatment is important for patients on longer intervals who may feel complacent or that treatment is no longer effective, particularly if newer, longer lasting agents become widely available.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Guidelines for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA)

          Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is still referred to as the leading cause of severe and irreversible visual loss world-wide. The disease has a profound effect on quality of life of affected individuals and represents a major socioeconomic challenge for societies due to the exponential increase in life expectancy and environmental risks. Advances in medical research have identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as an important pathophysiological player in neovascular AMD and intraocular inhibition of VEGF as one of the most efficient therapies in medicine. The wide introduction of anti-VEGF therapy has led to an overwhelming improvement in the prognosis of patients affected by neovascular AMD, allowing recovery and maintenance of visual function in the vast majority of patients. However, the therapeutic benefit is accompanied by significant economic investments, unresolved medicolegal debates about the use of off-label substances and overwhelming problems in large population management. The burden of disease has turned into a burden of care with a dissociation of scientific advances and real-world clinical performance. Simultaneously, ground-breaking innovations in diagnostic technologies, such as optical coherence tomography, allows unprecedented high-resolution visualisation of disease morphology and provides a promising horizon for early disease detection and efficient therapeutic follow-up. However, definite conclusions from morphologic parameters are still lacking, and valid biomarkers have yet to be identified to provide a practical base for disease management. The European Society of Retina Specialists offers expert guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic management of neovascular AMD supporting healthcare givers and doctors in providing the best state-of-the-art care to their patients. Trial registration number NCT01318941.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Prospective Trial of Treat-and-Extend versus Monthly Dosing for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: TREX-AMD 1-Year Results.

            To assess prospectively a treat-and-extend (TREX) management strategy compared with monthly dosing of intravitreal ranibizumab in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Long-Term Outcomes of Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Data from an Observational Study.

              To analyze the long-term outcomes of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) starting treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors at least 5 years earlier. Database observational study. Treatment-naïve eyes with neovascular AMD tracked by the Fight Retinal Blindness outcome registry that received at least 1 anti-VEGF injection. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves were used to display visual acuity (VA) results. Change in mean VA and number of injections and visits from baseline up to 7 years after initiating treatment. The mean follow-up time of all 1212 identified eyes was 53.5 months, and 549 (45%) continued attending after 60 months. Mean VA improved from 55.1 to 61.4 letters after 6 months and remained above the mean presenting VA for approximately 6 years. After 7 years, mean VA was 2.6 letters lower than baseline for the 131 eyes still being followed; 40% had VA ≥70 (20/40) letters, and 18% had VA ≤35 letters (20/200). Of those with 20/40 VA before treatment, 40% had lost it after 7 years. Geographic atrophy affecting the fovea was thought to be the cause of a ≥10-letter loss after 6.5 years in 37% of a subset of such eyes that were retrospectively analyzed. A median of 6 injections and 9 visits were recorded over the first 12 months, and then 5 treatments and 7 to 9 visits per annum thereafter through 7 years. Treatment was discontinued for 663 eyes (53%) within the first 5 years. Despite initial gains in vision, the mean VA of these eyes had deteriorated to baseline or worse around the time treatment was discontinued. The rate of serious adverse events was low. Good long-term outcomes of VEGF inhibition for neovascular AMD were found in this study. These results may be better than other reports because more injections were given to our patients, possibly associated with a greater incentive for the physician to treat. Further studies to determine how to maximize the proportion of eyes that retain the initial VA gains of anti-VEGF are warranted. Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kelvin.teo.y.c@singhealth.com.sg
                Journal
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye (Lond)
                Eye
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0950-222X
                1476-5454
                9 February 2022
                February 2023
                : 37
                : 3
                : 467-473
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.419272.b, ISNI 0000 0000 9960 1711, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, ; Singapore, Singapore
                [2 ]GRID grid.428397.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 0924, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, ; Singapore, Singapore
                [3 ]GRID grid.1013.3, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 834X, The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.411596.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0488 8430, Mater Private Hospital, ; Dublin, Ireland
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Gui De Chauliac Hospitla, Montpellier, France
                [6 ]GRID grid.411106.3, ISNI 0000 0000 9854 2756, Department of Ophthalmology, , Miguel Servet University Hospital, ; Zaragoza, Spain
                [7 ]GRID grid.6530.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2300 0941, University of Rome Tor Vergata, ; Rome, Italy
                [8 ]GRID grid.452600.5, ISNI 0000 0001 0547 5927, Department of Ophthalmology, , Isala Clinic, ; Zwolle, The Netherlands
                [9 ]GRID grid.411129.e, ISNI 0000 0000 8836 0780, Department of Ophthalmology, , Bellvitge University Hospital, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, ; Barcelona, Spain
                [10 ]Marsden Eye Specialists, Sydney, NSW Australia
                [11 ]GRID grid.412004.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0478 9977, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, ; Zurich, Switzerland
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7458-7081
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4851-0918
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-836X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8755-0923
                Article
                1957
                10.1038/s41433-022-01957-z
                9905488
                35140329
                27c6ed64-048a-4b3a-a2d3-9b7da315cb97
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2022
                History
                : 6 September 2021
                : 22 December 2021
                : 20 January 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100001349, MOH | National Medical Research Council (NMRC);
                Award ID: NMRC/LCG/0042018
                Award ID: TA19nov-0002
                Award ID: NMRC/LCG/0042018
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Walter and Gertrud Sigenthaler Foundation, Zurich
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000925, Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC);
                Award ID: NHMRC 2010-2012
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2023

                Vision sciences
                outcomes research,epidemiology
                Vision sciences
                outcomes research, epidemiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article