7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Systematic Review of Medical Costs Associated with Heart Failure in the USA (2014–2020)

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Heart failure presents a growing clinical and economic burden in the USA. Robust cost data on the burden of illness are critical to inform economic evaluations of new therapeutic interventions.

          Objectives

          This systematic literature review of heart failure-related costs in the USA aimed to assess the quality of the published evidence and provide a narrative synthesis of current data.

          Methods

          Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination York Database, including the NHS Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment Database) were searched for journal articles published between January 2014 and March 2020. The review, registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019134201), was restricted to cost-of-illness studies in adults with heart failure events in the USA.

          Results

          Eighty-seven studies were included, 41 of which allowed a comparison of cost estimates across studies. The annual median total medical costs for heart failure care were estimated at $24,383 per patient, with heart failure-specific hospitalizations driving costs (median $15,879 per patient). Analyses of subgroups revealed that heart failure-related costs are highly sensitive to individual patient characteristics (such as the presence of comorbidities and age) with large variations even within a subgroup. Additionally, differences in study design and a lack of standardized reporting limited the ability to compare cost estimates. The finding that costs are higher for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared with patients with preserved ejection fraction highlights the need for differentiating among different heart failure types.

          Conclusions

          The review underpins the conclusion drawn in earlier reviews, namely that hospitalization costs are the key driver of heart failure-related costs. Analyses of subgroups provide a clearer understanding of sources of heterogeneity in cost data. While current cost estimates provide useful indications of economic burden, understanding the nuances of the data is critical to support its application.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references113

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure.

          Heart failure (HF) is a global pandemic affecting at least 26 million people worldwide and is increasing in prevalence. HF health expenditures are considerable and will increase dramatically with an ageing population. Despite the significant advances in therapies and prevention, mortality and morbidity are still high and quality of life poor. The prevalence, incidence, mortality and morbidity rates reported show geographic variations, depending on the different aetiologies and clinical characteristics observed among patients with HF. In this review we focus on the global epidemiology of HF, providing data about prevalence, incidence, mortality and morbidity worldwide.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.

            Heart failure (HF) is an important contributor to both the burden and cost of national healthcare expenditures, with more older Americans hospitalized for HF than for any other medical condition. With the aging of the population, the impact of HF is expected to increase substantially. We estimated future costs of HF by adapting a methodology developed by the American Heart Association to project the epidemiology and future costs of HF from 2012 to 2030 without double counting the costs attributed to comorbid conditions. The model assumes that HF prevalence will remain constant by age, sex, and race/ethnicity and that rising costs and technological innovation will continue at the same rate. By 2030, >8 million people in the United States (1 in every 33) will have HF. Between 2012 and 2030, real (2010$) total direct medical costs of HF are projected to increase from $21 billion to $53 billion. Total costs, including indirect costs for HF, are estimated to increase from $31 billion in 2012 to $70 billion in 2030. If one assumes all costs of cardiac care for HF patients are attributable to HF (no cost attribution to comorbid conditions), the 2030 projected cost estimates of treating patients with HF will be 3-fold higher ($160 billion in direct costs). The estimated prevalence and cost of care for HF will increase markedly because of aging of the population. Strategies to prevent HF and improve the efficiency of care are needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

              Guidelines strongly recommend patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) be treated with multiple medications proven to improve clinical outcomes, as tolerated. The degree to which gaps in medication use and dosing persist in contemporary outpatient practice is unclear.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                murbich@amgen.com
                Journal
                Pharmacoeconomics
                Pharmacoeconomics
                Pharmacoeconomics
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                1170-7690
                1179-2027
                19 August 2020
                19 August 2020
                2020
                : 38
                : 11
                : 1219-1236
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.476152.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0476 2707, Amgen (Europe) GmbH, Global Health Economics, ; Suurstoffi 22, 6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland
                [2 ]GRID grid.417886.4, ISNI 0000 0001 0657 5612, Amgen Inc, Global Health Economics, ; Thousand Oaks, CA USA
                [3 ]Pharmerit – an OPEN Health Company, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ]Pharmerit – an OPEN Health Company, York, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.1005.4, ISNI 0000 0004 4902 0432, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, , University of New South Wales, ; Sydney, NSW Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-0249
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-6606
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-3567
                Article
                952
                10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0
                7546989
                32812149
                27ec10ca-1d12-4d43-ab06-facfdb4340b4
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100002429, Amgen;
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                Economics of health & social care
                Economics of health & social care

                Comments

                Comment on this article