90
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective To quantify the prevalence of incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain.

          Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

          Data sources Ovid Medline (1950 to May 2008), Embase (1980 to May 2008), and bibliographies of relevant articles.

          Review methods Two reviewers sought and assessed studies of people without neurological symptoms who underwent MRI of the brain with or without intravenous contrast for research purposes or for occupational, clinical, or commercial screening.

          Main outcome measures Overall disease specific and age specific prevalence of incidental brain findings, calculated by meta-analysis of pooled proportions using DerSimonian-Laird weights in a random effects model.

          Results In 16 studies, 135 of 19 559 people had neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 0.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.47% to 0.98%), and prevalence increased with age (χ 2 for linear trend, P=0.003). In 15 studies, 375 of 15 559 people had non-neoplastic incidental brain findings (prevalence 2.0%, 1.1% to 3.1%, excluding white matter hyperintensities, silent infarcts, and microbleeds). The number of asymptomatic people needed to scan to detect any incidental brain finding was 37. The prevalence of incidental brain findings was higher in studies using high resolution MRI sequences than in those using standard resolution sequences (4.3% v 1.7%, P<0.001). The prevalence of neoplastic incidental brain findings increased with age.

          Conclusions Incidental findings on brain MRI are common, prevalence increases with age, and detection is more likely using high resolution MRI sequences than standard resolution sequences. These findings deserve to be mentioned when obtaining informed consent for brain MRI in research and clinical practice but are not sufficient to justify screening healthy asymptomatic people.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment.

          The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is controversial. Investigators from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms aimed to assess the natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms and to measure the risk associated with their repair. Centres in the USA, Canada, and Europe enrolled patients for prospective assessment of unruptured aneurysms. Investigators recorded the natural history in patients who did not have surgery, and assessed morbidity and mortality associated with repair of unruptured aneurysms by either open surgery or endovascular procedures. 4060 patients were assessed-1692 did not have aneurysmal repair, 1917 had open surgery, and 451 had endovascular procedures. 5-year cumulative rupture rates for patients who did not have a history of subarachnoid haemorrhage with aneurysms located in internal carotid artery, anterior communicating or anterior cerebral artery, or middle cerebral artery were 0%, 2. 6%, 14 5%, and 40% for aneurysms less than 7 mm, 7-12 mm, 13-24 mm, and 25 mm or greater, respectively, compared with rates of 2 5%, 14 5%, 18 4%, and 50%, respectively, for the same size categories involving posterior circulation and posterior communicating artery aneurysms. These rates were often equalled or exceeded by the risks associated with surgical or endovascular repair of comparable lesions. Patients' age was a strong predictor of surgical outcome, and the size and location of an aneurysm predict both surgical and endovascular outcomes. Many factors are involved in management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Site, size, and group specific risks of the natural history should be compared with site, size, and age-specific risks of repair for each patient.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

            No consensus yet exists on how to handle incidental findings (IFs) in human subjects research. Yet empirical studies document IFs in a wide range of research studies, where IFs are findings beyond the aims of the study that are of potential health or reproductive importance to the individual research participant. This paper reports recommendations of a two-year project group funded by NIH to study how to manage IFs in genetic and genomic research, as well as imaging research. We conclude that researchers have an obligation to address the possibility of discovering IFs in their protocol and communications with the IRB, and in their consent forms and communications with research participants. Researchers should establish a pathway for handling IFs and communicate that to the IRB and research participants. We recommend a pathway and categorize IFs into those that must be disclosed to research participants, those that may be disclosed, and those that should not be disclosed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Neurology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: senior clinical fellow in neuroradiology
                Role: CSO clinical academic fellow
                Role: professor of neurology and epidemiology
                Role: consultant neurologist
                Role: attending physician
                Role: associate professor of diagnostic radiology
                Role: medical student
                Role: consultant radiologist
                Role: emeritus professor of medical neurology
                Role: professor of applied neuroimaging
                Role: MRC clinician scientist and honorary consultant neurologist
                Journal
                BMJ
                bmj
                BMJ : British Medical Journal
                BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
                0959-8138
                1468-5833
                2009
                2009
                17 August 2009
                : 339
                : b3016
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU
                [2 ]Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
                [3 ]German Air Force Institute of Aviation Medicine, Department of Neurology, Fuerstenfeldbruck, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
                [5 ]Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Hospital, Japan
                [6 ]Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
                [7 ]Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany
                [8 ]SFC Brain Imaging Research Centre, University of Edinburgh
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: R Al-Shahi Salman Rustam.Al-Shahi@ 123456ed.ac.uk
                Article
                morz639195
                10.1136/bmj.b3016
                2728201
                19687093
                2800e742-ab3b-48ff-a45a-2f1ca7d0a3de

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

                History
                : 27 May 2009
                Categories
                Research
                Neuroimaging
                Radiology
                Clinical diagnostic tests
                Radiology (diagnostics)
                Screening (epidemiology)
                Informed consent
                Internet
                Legal and forensic medicine
                Screening (public health)

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article