1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Modified Use of a Fibular Strut in the Reduction and Stabilization of 2-Part Osteoporotic Proximal Humerus Fractures

      research-article
      , MD , , MD, , MD, , MD
      JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
      Wolters Kluwer

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose:

          This study introduces a modified use of a fibular strut allograft as an adjunct to lateral locked plating in the treatment of osteoporotic two-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

          Methods:

          A prospective series of 13 consecutive patients (mean age 68; range, 60 to 88) with displaced two-part fractures of the proximal humerus were included. The main outcome measures included radiographic healing, clinical and radiographic findings of complications, assessment of shoulder function measured with the Shoulder Function Index, and ultrasonography assessment of rotator cuff disruption.

          Results:

          At postoperative month four, every fracture healed as evidenced on radiographic assessment. Clinically, patients achieved an average shoulder forward flexion of 141.5°, external rotation of 37°, and abduction of 98°. The mean Shoulder Function Index score was 73.2 (range, 64 to 77). No patients were included who required a major or a minor revision surgery. The average follow-up was 13.2 months (range, 12 to 15). Ultrasonography demonstrated no tears of the rotator cuff.

          Discussion:

          In a series of 13 patients, our technique facilitated fracture reduction while avoiding additional soft-tissue dissection at the fracture site and enabled supplementary stabilization after application of a lateral locking plate. Using this technique, we had minimal complications, a high rate of osseous healing, and achieved favorable clinical outcomes in a challenging patient population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

          We present a 5-year prospective study of the epidemiology of 1,027 proximal humeral fractures. These fractures, which tend to occur in fit elderly persons, have a unipolar age distribution and the highest age-specific incidence occurs in women between 80 and 89 years of age. The commonest was the B1.1 impacted valgus fracture, found in one-fifth of the cases in this series, a type that is not included in the Neer classification. We used both Neer and AO classifications. The AO classification proved to be more comprehensive because in the Neer classification, half of the fractures are minimally displaced and almost nine-tenths fall into only three categories. In the AO classification, the B1.1, A2.2, A3.2 and A1.2 sub-groups comprise over half of all proximal humeral fractures, while the AO type C fractures occur in only 6%. We suggest that the literature does not adequately reflect the spectrum of proximal humeral fractures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.

            the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly remains controversial. Options include nonoperative treatment, open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF), and hemiarthroplasty. Locking plate technology has expanded the indications for ORIF for certain fracture types in osteoporotic bone. This study was performed to characterize the incidence, treatment, and revision surgery of proximal humeral fractures according to geographic region both before (1999 to 2000) and after (2004 to 2005) the introduction of locking plates. we used a 20% sample of Medicare Part-B data and the Medicare denominator file for the years 1998 to 2006. Proximal humeral fractures were identified by Common Procedural Terminology codes for treatment, categorized as nonoperative, ORIF, or hemiarthroplasty. Geographic variation in treatment type was determined with use of 306 hospital referral regions. Odds ratios for revision surgery were calculated by the need for repeat surgery within one year of the index procedure. Rates were adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities. there were 14,774 proximal humeral fractures in the 20% sample from 1999 to 2000 (an estimated total of 73,870 fractures) and 16,138 fractures in the sample from 2004 to 2005 (an estimated total of 80,690 fractures). The overall age, sex, and race-adjusted incidence of proximal humeral fractures was unchanged from 1999 to 2005 (2.47 vs. 2.48 per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries; p = 0.992). However, the absolute rate of surgically managed proximal humeral fractures rose 3.2 percentage points from 12.5% to 15.7%, a relative increase of 25.6% (p < 0.0001). The relative increase in the percentage of fractures treated with ORIF was 28.5% (p < 0.0001), while the percentage of fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty increased 19.6% (p < 0.0001). There were large regional variations in the proportion treated surgically (range, 0% to 68.18%). The rates of repeat surgery were significantly higher in 2004 to 2005 compared with 1999 to 2000 (odds ratio = 1.47, p = 0.043). although the incidence of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly did not change from 1999 to 2005, the rate of surgical treatment increased significantly. The marked regional variation in the rates of surgical treatment highlights the need for better consensus regarding optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Additional research is needed to help to determine which fractures are best treated operatively in order to maximize outcome and minimize the need for revision surgery. therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

              We sought to determine current trends in the number of fall-related and osteoporosis-related proximal humeral fractures in elderly Finns during last three decades. We collected data from the National Hospital Discharge Register on all patients 60 years or older who were admitted to Finnish hospitals from 1970 to 2002 for primary treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Fractures induced by traffic accidents or other high-energy traumas were excluded. The number and incidence (per 100,000 patients) of fractures increased from 208 (number) and 32 (incidence) in 1970 to 1120 (number) and 105 (incidence) in 2002. The age adjusted incidence of proximal humeral fractures also showed an increase, from 51 (1970) to 129 (2002) in women, and from 14 (1970) to 48 (2002) in men. In women 80 years or older, the age specific incidence of fracture increased from 90 (1970) to 294 (2002), while in the other age groups trend changes were less extensive. The mean patient age also increased, from 73 years (1970) to 78 years (2002) in women and from 70 years (1970) to 73 years (2002) in men. If these trends continue, the number of fractures in elderly Finns will triple during the next three decades. Prognostic study, Level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev
                J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev
                JAAOS Glob Res Rev
                JAAOS Glob Res Rev
                JAAOS Glob Res Rev
                JAAOS Global Research & Reviews
                Wolters Kluwer (Philadelphia, PA )
                2474-7661
                October 2020
                16 October 2020
                : 4
                : 10
                : e20.00153
                Affiliations
                From Orlando Health Orthopaedic Institute, Orlando, FL.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Dr. Avilucea Frank.Avilucea@ 123456orlandohealth.com
                Article
                JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00153 00009
                10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00153
                7575192
                287531e6-ebcf-4f51-8d45-ed20c35b0d8a
                Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

                This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 28 July 2020
                : 01 August 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                TRUE
                T

                Comments

                Comment on this article