For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
14
views
22
references
 Top references
cited by
8
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      3,039
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Schema therapy for personality disorders in older adults: a multiple-baseline study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          No studies have been conducted yet into the effectiveness of treatment of personality disorders in later life. This study is a first test of the effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders in older adults.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II).

          Jill Lobbestael, Maartje Leurgans, Arnoud Arntz (2010)
          This study simultaneously assessed the inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Axis I (SCID I) and Axis II disorders (SCID II) in a mixed sample of n = 151 inpatients and outpatients, and non-patient controls. Audiotaped interviews were assessed by independent second raters blind for the first raters' scores and diagnoses. Categorical inter-rater reliability was assessed for 12 Axis I disorders of SCID I, while both categorical and dimensional inter-rater reliability was tested for all Axis II disorders. Results revealed moderate to excellent inter-rater agreement of the Axis I disorders, while most categorically and dimensionally measured personality disorders showed excellent inter-rater agreement. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
          Article 0 comments Cited 273 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The multiple baseline design for evaluating population-based research.

            Anthony Shakeshaft, Philip N Hawkins, Catherine D’Este … (2007)
            There is a need for pragmatic and rigorous research designs to evaluate the effectiveness of population-based health interventions. The randomized controlled trial (RCT) has limitations in its practicality, ethical appropriateness, and cost when evaluating population-based interventions. Like RCTs, the multiple baseline design can demonstrate that a change in behavior has occurred, the change is a result of the intervention, and the change is significant. Especially important practical advantages over the RCT are that this design requires fewer population groups and communities may act as their own controls. Advantages and methodologic limitations of the multiple baseline design are discussed, and where feasible, strategies to minimize the impact of its limitations are suggested. Recommendations for future research are included.
            Article 0 comments Cited 82 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients.

              Fons J Trompenaars, Erik Masthoff, Jolanda de Vries … (2005)
              In this study, the psychometric properties of a quality of life scale, the WHOQOL-Bref, were examined in a population of 533 Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. Participants underwent two semistructured interviews in order to obtain Axis-I and II diagnoses, according to DSM-IV. Besides the WHOQOL-Bref they also completed questionnaires for measuring psychopathological symptoms (SCL-90) and perceived social support (PSSS). Scores on 25 of the 26 questions of the WHOQOL-Bref had a good distribution. Similar to previous findings, exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure. A priori expected associations were found between the domains of the WHOQOL-Bref, on the one hand, and dimensions of the SCL-90 and the PSSS-score, on the other hand, indicating good construct validity. The internal consistency of the four domains of the WHOQOL-Bref ranged from 0.66 to 0.80. Domain scores of the WHOQOL-Bref correlated around 0.92 with the WHOQOL-100 domain scores. Relatively low correlations were found between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and WHOQOL-Bref domain scores. It is concluded that the content validity, construct validity, and the reliability of the WHOQOL-Bref in a population of adult Dutch psychiatric outpatients are good. The WHOQOL-Bref, therefore, is an adequate measure for assessing quality of life at the domain level in a population of adult psychiatric outpatients.
              Article 0 comments Cited 78 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Title: Aging & Mental Health
                Abbreviated Title: Aging & Mental Health
                Publisher: Informa UK Limited
                ISSN (Print): 1360-7863
                ISSN (Electronic): 1364-6915
                Publication date Created: April 20 2017
                Publication date Created: June 03 2018
                Publication date (Electronic): April 21 2017
                Publication date (Print): June 03 2018
                Volume: 22
                Issue: 6
                Pages: 738-747
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, GGz Breburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [2 ] Department of Clinical and Life Span Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ] Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Belgium and Mondriaan Hospital, Heerlen-Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [4 ] Center for Psychotherapy, Beuningen, The Netherlands
                [5 ] Tranzo Department, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [6 ] GGz Breburg, Clinical Center of Excellence for Body, Mind and Health, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
                [7 ] Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Article
                DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1318260
                PubMed ID: 28429623
                SO-VID: 28d61cc1-3733-4ab6-9cd7-f06acd8d1a21
                Copyright © © 2018
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content3,039

                See all similar

                Cited by11

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors675

                See all reference authors