13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Análisis bibliométrico de la producción científica latinoamericana y del Caribe sobre COVID-19 en PUBMED Translated title: Bibliometric analysis of Latin American and Caribbean scientific production about COVID-19 in PubMed

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar la producción científica latinoamericana y caribeña sobre COVID-19. Se consultó la base de datos PubMed. Se recuperaron 257 documentos (3 % de la producción mundial) publicados en 155 revistas. El crecimiento de la producción fue lineal (R2= 0,72). El índice de transitoriedad alcanzó el 89 %, y el 0,45 % de los autores latinoamericanos fueron grandes productores (≥ 10 trabajos). Un total de 655 autores afiliados a 311 instituciones procedieron de 16 países de Latinoamérica y del Caribe. La tasa de colaboración internacional alcanzó el 61,08 % y el nivel de colaboración internacional fue de 4,12 ± 2,93. Las revistas con mayor producción fueron Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (n= 23) y Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude: revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil (n= 13). Los trabajos se publicaron en inglés (96,87 %), portugués (8,56 %) y español (5,05 %). En América Latina es preciso incrementar el número de investigaciones sobre COVID-19 con autores más prolíficos para consolidar la literatura sobre el tema, y en colaboración internacional para poder establecer estrategias de actuación efectivas.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Latin American and Caribbean scientific production about COVID-19. The search was conducted in the database PubMed. A total 257 documents were retrieved (3% of the world production) from 155 journals. Output growth was found to be linear (R2= 0.72). The transience index reached 89%, and 0.45% of the Latin American authors were prolific producers (≥ 10 papers). A total 655 authors affiliated to 311 institutions were from 16 Latin American and Caribbean countries. The international collaboration rate reached 61.08%, and the international collaboration level was 4.12 ± 2.93. The journals with the greatest production were Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (n= 23) and Epidemiology and Health Services: Journal of the Brazilian Unified Health System (n= 13). The papers were published in English (96.87%), Portuguese (8.56%) and Spanish (5.05%). The number of studies about COVID-19 should be increased in Latin America with more prolific authors, to consolidate the bibliography on the topic. International collaboration should be broadened with a view to setting up effective work strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS?

          Summary The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in 2003 resulted in more than 8000 cases and 800 deaths. SARS was eventually contained by means of syndromic surveillance, prompt isolation of patients, strict enforcement of quarantine of all contacts, and in some areas top-down enforcement of community quarantine. By interrupting all human-to-human transmission, SARS was effectively eradicated. By contrast, by Feb 28, 2020, within a matter of 2 months since the beginning of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), more than 82 000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been reported with more than 2800 deaths. Although there are striking similarities between SARS and COVID-19, the differences in the virus characteristics will ultimately determine whether the same measures for SARS will also be successful for COVID-19. COVID-19 differs from SARS in terms of infectious period, transmissibility, clinical severity, and extent of community spread. Even if traditional public health measures are not able to fully contain the outbreak of COVID-19, they will still be effective in reducing peak incidence and global deaths. Exportations to other countries need not result in rapid large-scale outbreaks, if countries have the political will to rapidly implement countermeasures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            COVID-19 in Latin America: The implications of the first confirmed case in Brazil

            Over the past weeks the spread of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [1], has been steady in Asia and other regions in the world. Latin America was an exception until February 25, 2020, when the Brazilian Ministry of Health, confirmed the first case. This first case was a Brazilian man, 61 years-old, who traveled from February 9 to 20, 2020, to Lombardy, northern Italy, where a significant outbreak is ongoing. He arrived home on February 21, 2020, and was attended at the Hospital Albert Einstein in São Paulo, Brazil. At this institution, an initial real-time RT-PCR was positive for SARS-CoV-2 and then confirmed by the National Reference Laboratory at the Instituto Adolfo Lutz using the real-time RT-PCR protocol developed by the Institute of Virology at Charité in Berlin, Germany [2]. The established protocol also included now, as part of the Sao Paulo State Health Secretary, metagenomics and immunohistochemistry with PCR, as part of the response plan to COVID-19 outbreak in the city [3]. The patient presented with fever, dry cough, sore throat, and coryza. So far, as of February 27, the patient is well, with mild signs. He received standard precautionary care, and in the meantime, he is isolated at home [4]. Local health authorities are carrying out the identification and tracing of contacts at home, at the hospital, and on the flight. For now, other cases are under investigation in São Paulo, and other cities in Latin America. In addition to the São Paulo State Health Secretary, the Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases have developed technical recommendations [4]. This is the first case of COVID-19 in the South American region with a population of over 640 million people [5] who have also experienced significant outbreaks of infections which were declared Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHIC), by the World Health Organization (WHO). So it was with Zika in 2016. The Zika outbreak also began in Brazil [6]. In the current scenario, the spread of COVID-19 to other neighboring countries is expected and is probably inevitable in the light of the arrival of suspected cases from Italy, China, and other significantly affected countries. São Paulo is the most populated city in South America, with more than 23 million people and high flight connectivity in the region (Fig. 1 ). Its main airport, the São Paulo-Guarulhos International Airport, is the largest in Brazil, with non-stop passenger flights scheduled to 103 destinations in 30 countries, and 52 domestic flights, connecting not only with major cities in Latin America but also with direct flights to North America, Europe, Africa and the Middle East (Dubai). There are also buses that offer a service to and from the metropolitan centers of Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay and Bolivia. Brazil also connects with the countries of Chile, Argentina and Bolivia through some rail connections. The main seaport of Brazil is in Rio de Janeiro, where many international cruises also arrive. Thus, over the course of the next few days, a significant expansion in the region would be possible. Fig. 1 Flight connections from São Paulo's main international airport, Brazil. Source: flightconnections.com. Fig. 1 The healthcare systems in this region are already fragile [7]. Moreover, fragmentation and segmentation are ongoing challenges for most of these vulnerable systems. Multiple social and economic issues are ongoing and will impact the situation, including the massive exodus from Venezuela to many countries in the region. This human migration is associated with other infectious diseases, such as malaria or measles [8]. The burden that will be imposed on the region, if and when COVID-19 spreads, would be an additional challenge for the healthcare systems and economies in the region, as we faced with Zika and even the Chikungunya outbreaks [9]. For example, there is concern about the availability of intensive care units, that are necessary for at least 20–25% of patients hospitalized with COVID-19—also, the availability of specific diagnostic tests, particularly the real-time RT-PCR is a crucial challenge for early detection of COVID-19 importation and prevention of onward transmission. Even maybe in some countries, cases have been not diagnosed due to lack of availability of specific tests. Are Latin American healthcare systems sufficiently prepared? Probably not, but in general, this is the same in other regions of the world, such as in many parts of Asia and Africa [10]. Although most countries in Latin America are trying to step up their preparedness to detect and cope with COVID-19 outbreaks, it will be essential to intensify inter-continental and intra-continental, communication and health workforce training. In the Latin American region, there is a large heterogeneity of political and social development, economic growth, and political capacities. For example, in the Caribbean subregion, countries such as Haiti have a low Human Development Index. In such areas, and Venezuela where a humanitarian crisis had occurred since 2019 spreading measles, diphtheria, and vector-borne diseases, such as malaria, over the region [[11], [12], [13]], the impact of a COVID-19 outbreak will be more devastating than in the more developed economies, such as Brazil or Mexico. Most of the countries in the region are remembering the lessons learned during SARS (2003) and pandemic influenza (2009). Protocols already developed during those crises, including laboratory and patient management, may prove useful in this new situation. Good communication strategies for preventive measures in the population, and in neighboring countries in addition to Brazil, will be essential and this response should be aligned with the recommendations of the WHO. In Latin America, the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) recent epidemiological alert for measles shows that from January 1, 2019 to January 24, 2020, 20,430 confirmed cases of measles were reported, including 19 deaths, in 14 countries: Argentina, Bahamas, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Curaçao, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. Brazil contributed 88% of the total confirmed cases in the Americas [14]. In the first 4 weeks of 2020, a staggering 125,514 cases of measles were notified. The dengue incidence rate is 12.86 cases/100,000 inhabitants in the region for the ongoing year, including 27 deaths, 12,891 cases confirmed by laboratory and 498 cases classified as severe dengue (0.4%). Countries like Bolivia, Honduras, Mexico and Paraguay have reported an increase of double or triple the number of cases of dengue compared to the same period from the previous year [15]. In this complex epidemiological scenario, we are about to witness a syndemic [16] of measles, dengue, and COVID-19, among others, unfold. The World Health Organization (WHO) has published guidelines encouraging the provision of information to health professionals and the general public. Resources, intensified surveillance, and capacity building should be urgently prioritized in countries with a moderate risk that might be ill-prepared to detect imported cases and to limit onward transmission, as has already occurred in Brazil. [For the moment of proofs correction of this Editorial –Mar. 1, 2020–, 2 cases have been confirmed in Brazil, but also new 5 confirmed cases were also reported in Mexico (2° country that reported cases), 6 in Ecuador (3°) and 1 in Dominican Republic (4°), summarizing 14 cases in Latin America]. Credit author statement AJRM conceived the idea of the Editorial and wrote the first draft. The rest of the authors reviewed and improved the second draft. All authors approved the final version. Author contributions Conceptualization: AJRM. Writing—original draft preparation: AJRM. Writing—review, and editing: All the authors. Funding source None. Ethical approval Approval was not required. Declaration of competing interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.All authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the Form for Disclosure of Potential.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 Research Activity: A Call for Increased Output

              Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted many countries across all inhabited continents, and is now considered a global pandemic, due to its high rate of infectivity. Research related to this disease is pivotal for assessing pathogenic characteristics and formulating therapeutic strategies. The aim of this paper is to explore the activity and trends of COVID-19 research since its outbreak in December 2019. Methods: We explored the PubMed database and the World Health Organization (WHO) database for publications pertaining to COVID-19 since December 2019 up until March 18, 2020. Only relevant observational and interventional studies were included in our study. Data on COVID-19 incidence were extracted from the WHO situation reports. Research output was assessed with respect to gross domestic product (GDP) and population of each country. Results: Only 564 publications met our inclusion criteria. These articles came from 39 different countries, constituting 24% of all affected countries. China produced the greatest number of publications with 377 publications (67%). With respect to continental research activity, Asian countries had the highest research activity with 434 original publications (77%). In terms of publications per million persons (PPMPs), Singapore had the highest number of publications with 1.069 PPMPs. In terms of publications per billion-dollar GDP, Mauritius ranked first with 0.075. Conclusion: COVID-19 is a major disease that has impacted international public health on a global level. Observational studies and therapeutic trials pertaining to COVID-19 are essential for assessing pathogenic characteristics and developing novel treatment options.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ics
                Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud
                Rev. cuba. inf. cienc. salud
                Editorial Ciencias Médicas (La Habana, , Cuba )
                2307-2113
                September 2020
                : 31
                : 3
                : e1600
                Affiliations
                [1] GRAAL Cataluña orgnameUniversitat de Girona orgdiv1Escola Universitària de la Salut i l'Esport Spain
                [2] orgnameUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona orgdiv1Hospital de l'Esperança España
                Article
                S2307-21132020000300008 S2307-2113(20)03100300008
                29823b42-a1b0-4908-9f6e-25a06ce2aecc

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 17 August 2020
                : 11 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Cuba


                COVID-19,Latin America,the Caribbean,Latinoamérica,infecciones por coronavirus,bibliometría,el Caribe,coronavirus infections, bibliometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article