65
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Facet distraction-arthrodesis technique: Can it revolutionize spinal stabilization methods?

      editorial
      Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
      Medknow Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Goel's facet distraction arthrodesis technique[1] presents a new philosophy and an alternative method of treatment of degenerative spinal canal stenosis[1 2] and opens up an entirely new and hitherto uncharted avenue of spinal stabilization. The concept of facetal distraction using specially designed “Goel facet spacers” for spondylotic spinal disease is based on the fact that the “age-related” or “instability related” facetal overriding or telescoping may be an important component of pathogenesis of “spinal canal stenosis.”[1 2] The technique of facet distraction essentially aims to restore the natural “anatomical spacing” of the spinal segments. The inherent tensile strength of the spinal segments firmly impacts the facetal implant and obviates the need for any additional form of internal stabilization. The procedure ultimately results in arthrodesis of the affected spinal segments. Decompression of the spinal canal and root is achieved without removal or manipulation of any part of the disk, bone, or ligaments. The unique standing human posture-related muscle weakness or incompetence of back extensor muscles leads to facetal telescoping. Disuse atrophy of the muscles of the back secondary to sedentary life style or increasing age forms the basis of the spinal degeneration. Muscles have a role in keeping the spinal segments apart. Reduction of the interfacetal space and facetal retrolisthesis appears to be an initial phenomenon that leads to a cascade of events like ligamental buckling, subsequent osteophyte formation, and reduction in the spinal canal and intervertebral root canal dimensions culminating into the so-called degenerative spinal canal stenosis. The disk changes essentially appear to be a reaction to the primary facetal instability with only a secondary and possibly a protective role in the overall process of spinal degeneration. The observation that distraction of the facets potentially reverses all the known pathologic features seen in the spinal degeneration validates the concept that facetal overriding may be the primary feature in spondylosis that leads to spinal canal stenosis. The technique of facetal distraction spacer arthrodesis is a rather straightforward and strong modality of spinal fixation. The stabilization of the spinal segment at the fulcrum of spinal movements provides biomechanical advantage to the fixation process. By distraction, the unique pattern of anatomical inclination of the facets at each spinal level can be used advantageously to restore the spinal alignment. Direct observation of the facets during surgery provides an opportunity for real-time assessment of instability that may not clearly be visualized on dynamic imaging. Facetal distraction arthrodesis treatment is unaffected by and does not jeopardize any other form of anterior or posterior decompressive or stabilization surgical procedure. This fact can be advantageously used in failed decompressive surgery. All other described surgical procedures are possible when facetal distraction arthrodesis has not produced the desired clinical result. The term “degenerative stenosis” of the spine may be more aptly referred to as “spinal instability.” The symptoms of spinal stenosis are generally related to activity that probably exhausts the muscles that hold the spinal segments apart. The “lumbar claudication pain” starts after walking for a distance. If the canal was stenosed, the symptoms would have been present at rest. The fact that symptoms begin after walking for a distance suggest that spinal telescoping is related to “vertical” instability that is secondary to muscle weakness. Telescoping of the spinal segment results in buckling of the intervertebral ligaments. Essentially the ligaments are buckled and not hypertrophied or degenerated. The reduction of the disk space height can be secondary to the facetal listhesis rather than being a primary phenomenon as has been discussed in the literature. Osteophyte formation occurs as a result of periosteal reaction along the intervertebral ligaments. The disk space height and “disc water content” are potentially reversible following facetal distraction. Anterior, lateral, and posterior intervertebral ligamentous buckling can reverse following surgery. Extension of surgery for multilevel treatment is relatively a straightforward maneuver. Multilevel surgery by anterior cervical route can not only be tedious but can also subject critical nerves and blood vessels and trachea-oesophageal complex to risk of injury. Facetal distraction arthrodesis is a rather safe surgical procedure. There is no need to expose the spinal cord or dura. The vertebral artery and the spinal roots are strategically placed and are safe during the process of facetal distraction. Our 23-year experience of opening and manipulating the C1-2 joint[3 4] and our 12- year experience with "joint jamming" technique,[5] wherein we introduce a specially designed spacer within the articular cavity of C1-2 joint, have provided us an opportunity to evaluate the dynamics and importance of the joints in the stabilization of the spinal segments. Denuding the articular cartilage and bone grafting within the facet joint provides an opportunity of stabilization at the point of fulcrum of spinal movement. Although fixation of the facets has been discussed, utilization of the joint surface in the provision of arthrodesis is only rarely advocated. Additional bone graft placement over the laminae increases the space available for bone fusion. The process of opening of the joints also provides an opportunity to manipulate the facets. Such a maneuver can be useful in cases with facetal locking and similar such situations. We have effectively used the process of manipulation of facets in the treatment of basilar invagination,[6 7] irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation,[8] and rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation.[9] We have observed that subtle instability and reduction of the joint space have a role in buckling of posterior longitudinal ligament and subsequent osteophyte formation at the craniovertebral junction.[10] Distraction of the C1-2 facets provides an opportunity to treat anteriorly placed compressive lesions without directly handling them. Lateral mass height reduction or even a lateral mass collapse as seen in rheumatoid arthritis that affects craniovertebral junction can result in marked posterior buckling of posterior longitudinal ligament, referred to as pannus.[11–13] Facetal distraction can lead to immediate postoperative reduction or even disappearance of the “pannus.”[13] Facetal distraction arthrodesis provides not only an avenue for firm stabilization of the spine but also has the potential of reversal of several events that are related to spondylosis and other pathologic entities. The facetal opening, distraction, and manipulation and fixation can be an effective tool in the armamentarium of a spinal surgeon.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Facetal distraction as treatment for single- and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report.

          The authors discuss their successful preliminary experience with 36 cases of cervical spondylotic disease by performing facetal distraction using specially designed Goel cervical facet spacers. The clinical and radiological results of treatment are analyzed. The mechanism of action of the proposed spacers and the rationale for their use are evaluated. Between 2006 and February 2010, 36 patients were treated using the proposed technique. Of these patients, 18 had multilevel and 18 had single-level cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy. The average follow-up period was 17 months with a minimum of 6 months. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association classification system, visual analog scale (neck pain and radiculopathy), and Odom criteria were used to monitor the clinical status of the patient. The patients were prospectively analyzed. The technique of surgery involved wide opening of the facet joints, denuding of articular cartilage, distraction of facets, and forced impaction of Goel cervical facet spacers into the articular cavity. Additionally, the interspinous process ligaments were resected, and corticocancellous bone graft from the iliac crest was placed and was stabilized over the adjoining laminae and facets after adequately preparing the host bone. Eighteen patients underwent single-level, 6 patients underwent 2-level, and 12 patients underwent 3-level treatment. The alterations in the physical architecture of spine and canal dimensions were evaluated before and after the placement of intrafacet joint spacers and after at least 6 months of follow-up. All patients had varying degrees of relief from symptoms of pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy. Analysis of radiological features suggested that the distraction of facets with the spacers resulted in an increase in the intervertebral foraminal dimension (mean 2.2 mm), an increase in the height of the intervertebral disc space (range 0.4-1.2 mm), and an increase in the interspinous distance (mean 2.2 mm). The circumferential distraction resulted in reduction in the buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum. The procedure ultimately resulted in segmental bone fusion. No patient worsened after treatment. There was no noticeable implant malfunction. During the follow-up period, all patients had evidence of segmental bone fusion. No patient underwent reexploration or further surgery of the neck. Distraction of the facets of the cervical vertebra can lead to remarkable and immediate stabilization-fixation of the spinal segment and increase in space for the spinal cord and roots. The procedure results in reversal of several pathological events related to spondylotic disease. The safe, firm, and secure stabilization at the fulcrum of cervical spinal movements provided a ground for segmental spinal arthrodesis. The immediate postoperative improvement and lasting recovery from symptoms suggest the validity of the procedure.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Facet distraction spacers for treatment of degenerative disease of the spine: Rationale and an alternative hypothesis of spinal degeneration

            Atul Goel (2010)
            Degenerative diseases of the spine are common. The cervical and lumbar spine are more frequently affected and the dorsal spine is less commonly involved in the process. Degeneration of the disk or reduction in its ‘water’ content has been recognized as the principal initiating factor that starts off a cascade of secondary ‘degenerative’ effects on the spine. Numerous processes occur consecutively and the overall effect is reduction of the spinal canal and root canal dimensions, a phenomenon that is manifested by pain and symptoms of spinal cord, cauda equina, and spinal root compression. The disabling nature of the clinical symptoms leads the patient to a doctor. The accepted concept of spinal degeneration is that reduction of the disk space height results in posterior buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and the ‘periosteal reaction’ thus initiates the formation of osteophytes. The osteophytes progressively increase in size resulting in an increasing indentation into the spinal canal. Simultaneous to the buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligaments, there occurs in-folding of the ligamentum flavum. Both these anterior and posterior indentations result in reduction of the spinal canal dimensions and ultimately cause symptoms of neural compression. The spinal degeneration is more common in the junctional zones of the spine at the C5-6 and C6-7 and the L4-5 and L5-S1 levels. Simultaneous to the events that occur in the midline, there occur relatively less apparent, but probably more significant, effects of degeneration on the facet joints. The facets are relatively small in size and the overall movements that occur at these joints are less obvious and get overwhelmed by the imposing presence of the intervertebral disk, which corners the entire focus. Although difficult to evaluate and quantify, reduction of the facet joint space can be an early sign that signals the initiation of the process of degeneration. In the cervical and dorsal spine, the facets being more horizontally (transversely) and obliquely inclined, there occurs a phenomenon of retrolisthesis, wherein, the superior facet slips on to the inferior facet. In the lumbar spine, the facets being more vertically aligned, the articular capsule becomes lax due to vertical facetal override (superior facet slips inferiorly in relationship to the inferior facet) and the joint appears bulkier. Degenerative osteophytes can also form in the facets. The degenerative effects on the facets ultimately result in the reduction in height of the spinal root canal or the intervertebral neural foramina. The symptom of local back pain could also originate from the facet joints. The symptom of claudication pain may also be related to muscle fatigue on walking and resultant exacerbation of facetal override. The entire process of degeneration results in spinal and root canal stenosis. Degeneration can occur at a single or more than one segments of the spine. More often the process of degeneration is generalized and multiple segments and regions of the spine are involved simultaneously. A number of theories and concepts of degeneration of the spine have been proposed and discussed over the last century. However, the basic premise of the hypothesis of origin of the disease process from the primary disk degeneration has been universally accepted and has not been questioned. In the year 2006, we proposed an alternative method of treatment for spinal degeneration, which involved distraction of the facets and forced introduction of ‘Goel facet spacers’.[1 2] Although the technique of introduction of the spacers into the facet joint varied in the lumbar spine, when compared to the cervical and dorsal spines, the basic concept and principle of its action was similar. The process of facetal distraction resulted in a remarkable reversal of almost the entire gamut of changes in the degeneration of the spine.[3] The increase in the height of the facets resulted in an increase in the spinal canal dimensions and in the height and diameter of the intervertebral foramina. The interlaminar distance increased. The intervertebral body height increased in its entirety and there was restoration of height of the disk space. The disk water content also seemed to increase and get restored. The posterior buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament and the anterior bulge of the ligamentum flavum was simultaneously reduced. There was essentially a reversal of all the major known pathological events of spinal degeneration. Facetal instability could clearly be observed during surgery. Distraction of the facets by forced introduction of spacers resulted in restoration of the facetal height and fixation and alignment of the spinal segment. Over a period of five years, approximately a hundred patients underwent treatment by facetal distraction in our department. Specially designed instruments were used for the purpose. Goel facetal spacers were made from Titanium metal. [The implants are proprietary items of General Surgical Company (GESCO India) Pvt. Ltd. and patent has been filed by Dr. Goel. The implants are not yet commercially available.] The spacers were in the form of a disk, the height of which ranged from 2.5 to 4 mm and the diameter was 8 to 12 mm. The spacer impactor was fixed over the base of the spacer by a screw-type joint. The spacer impactor assisted in impacting the spacer within the facet joint and also directed and controlled its traverse. The procedure of impaction was remarkably safe with regard to the nerve root, spinal cord, and vertebral artery. Essentially, decompression of the spinal canal and root canal was obtained without removal of any part of the bone, ligaments or disk. It was observed that such a treatment was relatively straightforward and easy to perform when compared to the other available methods. The technique resulted in an immediate postoperative relief of symptoms of spinal cord and root compression. Apart from the preoperative clinical and radiological guides, direct intraoperative observation of the status of the facets also guided the decision regarding the levels of the spine that needed treatment. Superior and inferior extension of the level of surgery was significantly easier. Bone graft pieces harvested from the iliac crest were then placed over the laminae, between the spinous processes, and over the treated facets, after appropriately preparing the host area. The procedure ultimately resulted in fusion of the spinal segment. On the basis of our observations during the surgery that involved facetal distraction we present an alternative hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis and progress of spinal degeneration. It appears that spinal degeneration may not be initiated in the disk. Muscular laxity or weakness can lead to spinal instability that is manifested by facetal changes related to its incompetence. It appears that instability of the spinal segment may play a crucial role in the presenting clinical scenario and the observed radiological features. The entire phenomenon of spinal degeneration and resultant changes in the spine may be secondary to facetal incompetence. Such instability is rather easily observed on direct visualization of the joint during surgery, even when preoperative dynamic radiographs do not depict such an event. Reversal of all major known changes, generally associated with spinal degeneration, following a single process of insertion of distraction spacers within the joint, provides credence to this hypothesis. Spinal instability as a result of laxity of muscles of the spine can lead to retrolisthesis of facets of the cervical and dorsal spine and facetal overriding of the lumbar spine. The associated changes with reduction of the disk space height, osteophyte formation, buckling of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum into the spinal canal, and reduction of the spinal canal and root canal dimensions, may all be secondary phenomena. The fact that traction of the cervical and lumbar spines has formed the principal and successful form of non-surgical treatment over several decades provides support to the concept. The effectiveness of traction as a treatment method can be gauged by its lasting popularity and clinical success. Advocacy of physiotherapy and muscle exercises and consequent relief from symptoms also point in the same direction. Our preliminary observations suggest that distraction of the facets by manual implantation of metal spacers within the articular cavity results in sustained traction and fixation of the spinal segment, and provide an opportunity for local arthrodesis in a distracted position. Although reduction of inter-facet space height has been discussed in the literature, it appears that this may be one important radiological guide that can determine the stability of the region. Decrease in height and retrolisthesis of the facets are indicators of instability and determine the need for distraction surgery. The oblique profile, relatively large size, firmness, and the biomechanical strength of the facets and of the pedicles can be used effectively and safely for distraction of the spinal segments and fixation. Distraction of the facets is done by surgically implanting specially designed spacers. Impaction of spacers in the facets results in several structural changes, all resulting in reversing the pathological effects of spondylosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Craniovertebral instability due to degenerative osteoarthritis of the atlantoaxial joints: analysis of the management of 108 cases.

              The authors retrospectively analyzed a series of 108 patients in whom was diagnosed atlantoaxial instability due to degenerative osteoarthritis of the atlantoaxial joints. The management issues in such cases are discussed. One hundred eight patients with osteoarthritis of the atlantoaxial joints and resultant craniovertebral instability-diagnosed on the basis of presenting clinical features, radiological imaging, and direct observation of the joint status during surgery-were retrospectively analyzed. Between 1990 and 2008, these patients were treated with a C1-2 lateral mass plate and screw method of atlantoaxial fixation and joint distraction using bone graft with or without the assistance of metal spacers. Patient ages ranged from 48 to 84 years (average 63 years). There was a history of mild to moderate head and/or neck trauma 2 months to 11 years prior to diagnosis in 40% of the cases. All patients had symptoms of neck pain, and 82% of the patients had progressive myelopathy. A reduction in the height of the atlantoaxial lateral mass complex (100%), mobile atlantoaxial dislocation (100%), basilar invagination (68%), and periodontoid degenerative tissue mass (90%) were the more frequently encountered radiological features. Two patients died in the immediate postoperative period. At an average follow-up of 64 months, all surviving patients remarkably improved to varying degrees in their neurological condition. Atlantoaxial joint arthritis frequently leads to craniovertebral instability and cord compression. Treatment by joint distraction and lateral mass fixation can be an optimum form of treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
                JCVJS
                Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
                Medknow Publications (India )
                0974-8237
                0976-9285
                Jan-Jun 2011
                : 2
                : 1
                : 1-2
                Affiliations
                [1]Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, India
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Prof. Atul Goel, Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai – 400 012, India. E-mail: atulgoel62@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                JCVJS-2-1
                10.4103/0974-8237.85306
                3190423
                22013368
                29ed3f3d-6201-43f6-96e3-bce843d518de
                Copyright: © Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Editorial

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article