Early in the national response to the COVID-19 crisis, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust (MEH) anticipated that its key contribution to the London health
and care system would be to continue to provide safe, effective, eye care to patients
requiring sight saving intervention in an environment where many other ophthalmic
units would be closed or be unable to access surgical facilities. As a hospital based
in London, an epicentre of infection, it was clear that the organisation would rapidly
need to respond to the crisis. The overarching premise of this response was that the
Trust would move to providing emergency sight- or life-threatening (ocular oncology)
care only from March 23rd 2020.
MEH consists of a network of 26 sites across London. It was anticipated that its smaller,
peripheral sites would be more susceptible to total closure due to staff sickness
or reallocation and/or space requirements of host Trusts. A decision was therefore
made to converge critical services to larger or independent sites. Intravitreal injections
would be continued at all sites that remained open in recognition of the increased
risk and burden of travel on the elderly population that were the majority users of
the service. Emergency or urgent surgery would only be continued at the central site
and all closed units would be required to redirect appropriate patients to the nearest
centre.
MEH developed and used a similar risk stratification approach to that described by
ophthalmic professional bodies such as the Royal College of Ophthalmologists and the
American Academy of Ophthalmologists as well as in other COVID-19-related articles
[1, 2]. Clinical teams were assigned to hot (on site) and cold (off site or non-patient
facing) working weeks to deliver clinical work and, patient triage and remote consultation,
respectively.
Early indications suggested that surrounding general hospitals in Greater London would
become overwhelmed with COVID-19 patients and that many ophthalmic units within general
hospitals would no longer be able to perform ophthalmic surgery. It was expected that
Moorfields would see a sharp rise in patients attending A + E. Communication networks
with other clinical leads were vital in understanding the pressures of neighbouring
units. Ophthalmic units were encouraged to continue to triage local emergencies and
urgent cases, even if access to theatres for emergency or elective surgery ceased,
and only to refer onward to MEH for emergency surgery.
Where possible, patients would be redirected at the front entrance of the unit to
use Attend Anywhere, an online consultation service run by the department, for any
condition that was not an emergency and, for those deemed to be high risk of being
COVI-19 positive from screening questions. Virtual consultation platforms would allow
both vulnerable patients and staff members to access and provide clinical care.
Subspecialty stations were created around the hospital to deal with the anticipated
increase in ophthalmic emergencies and to allow direct triage of patients into relevant
clinics to facilitate early clinical diagnosis and management, avoid re-examination
of patients and avoid subsequent unnecessary patient reviews and travel.
Contrary to the anticipated increase in patient numbers either in response to local
units closing or reduced outpatient appointments, MEH experienced a significant reduction
in total attendance numbers. Prior to the lockdown, the A&E department would manage
an average of 1900 cases per week, this reduced by >50% (Table 1). Low attendance
rates for face–face appointments enabled swift triage and management with an average
wait time of 1 h from registration to discharge in contrast to the government target
of 4 h. The lower numbers also facilitated appropriate social distancing of patients
within the department.
Table 1
Total attendances at Moorfields A + E (face to face and Attend Anywhere), City Road
for week commencing 15th March 2020 as compared with 2019.
A + E attendances
Date
2020
15/03
22/03
29/03
05/04
12/04
19/04
1371
833
502
517
673
714
2019
17/03
24/03
31/03
07/04
14/04
21/04
1960
1911
1868
1861
1943
1808
−30%
−56%
−73%
−72%
−65%
−61%
Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak 40% of attendances to the A&E were not considered to
be life- or sight-threatening emergencies. Following implementation of ‘at-the-door’
triage with digital platform support, the majority of attendances were potentially
site threatening conditions. Trauma and painful conditions such as corneal ulcers
and orbital cellulitis continued to present to the department (Table 2). Of concern,
however, was that some conditions were presenting with more advanced or severe disease,
suggesting that patients were reluctant to risk exposure to COVID-19 in order to seek
medical attention. The number of trauma patients, particularly those related to domestic
abuse, increased.
Table 2
Top five A + E presentations before and after the initiation of COVID-19 isolation
measures and introduction of Attend Anywhere.
Diagnoses for Jan and Feb 2020
Diagnoses for March and April 2020
Primary diagnosis
Number
Primary diagnosis
Number
Blepharitis
628
Acute anterior uveitis
349
Posterior vitreous detachment
609
Corneal abrasion
343
Acute anterior uveitis
606
Posterior vitreous detachment
270
Corneal abrasion
577
Blepharitis
218
Dry eyes
574
Chalazion
191
Total
2994
Total
1371
Digital consultations proved very successful with up to 57% of cases being managed
using Attend Anywhere (Fig. 1). The majority were for minor symptoms managed with
reassurance, advice or self-care. Other consultations were for advice following cancellation
of outpatient appointments and for prescription requests. 21.1% required onward referral
to the A&E or to a subspecialty service. This was particularly noteworthy given that
the digital platform was only launched within 48 h of the lockdown, demonstrating
how teams can work together proactively and positively to support new initiatives.
Fig. 1
A bar chart demonstrating the number of Attend Anywhere consultations per day following
its active implementation in week commencing March 23rd, 2020.
The number of consultations increased dramatically following introduction of isolations
measures and the use of active triage at the entrance to the department encouraging
its use. The Number of Attend Anywhere consultations following its active implementation
in week commencing March 23rd, 2020.
In the medical retina service, particular attention was focussed on the importance
of maintaining intravitreal injections for the treatment of choroidal neovascular
membranes primarily secondary to age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Existing
patients were triaged such that only those most at risk of irreversible visual loss
would continue to receive treatment (Fig. 2). Despite limiting the service to high-risk
patients only there were multiple patient-initiated cancellations, the average DNA
rate increased to 24.9% (range 13–42.9%). Similarly, the number of new presentations
of ARMD also decreased significantly (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2
Bar chart showing the number of injections performed across Moorfields Eye Hospital
Trust showing the impact on isolation measures on attendance and first injection rates.
Following introduction of isolation measures the number of injections performed in
April fell significantly for both follow up and new patients.
Fig. 3
A bar chart showing the number of new AMD cases presenting by week (grey) starting
the first week in March 2020 compared with presentation rates in 2019 (orange) and
2018 (blue) for the same week.
Week 4 represents the week commencing March 23rd when the Trust mobilised to restrict
services to emergency care only, the speed of onset of these measures meant that many
patients were not contactable prior to their planned appointment. Despite this numbers
still fell significantly as compared to previous years due to high DNA rates. Subsequent
weeks show further decreases in patient numbers and represent those with active disease
or patients undergoing treatment in their only seeing eye.
An increase in patients presenting for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and
emergency surgery was expected due to the closure of surrounding ophthalmic theatres.
MEH theatres were configured to provide three emergency theatres and the VR service
divided into three teams comprising of three consultants and 2/3 fellows working hot
and cold weeks.
Contrary to our expectations, the number of patients presenting with retinal detachment
fell significantly following introduction of isolation measures (Fig. 4). The number
of retinal detachment operations fell to an average of 14 cases per week, an average
drop of 62% compared with the same period in 2019.
Fig. 4
A bar chart showing the number of patients presenting to VRE in March/April 2019 (blue) and
2020 (orange).
The number of patients presenting with retinal detachment fell an average of 62% compared
with same period in 2019.
These observations have also been made by VR surgeons in departments across the UK.
In an analysis by David Yorston, using data from the Scottish Retinal Detachment Census,
53% of RD are neither presenting nor being treated (personal communication).
These figures across urgent and emergency ophthalmic services show a worrying trend
that patients are neglecting symptoms of visual loss. Although it is possible that
the rate of ocular trauma and retinal detachment is actually reduced due to inactivity
during isolation, one can also infer that reduced presentation represents concerns
regarding the risk of contracting COVID-19, particularly in a perceived high-risk
environment such as a hospital. It may also reflect poor awareness of how to access
ophthalmic care, many patients are familiar with initially seeking advice from an
optometrist or GP. The closure of most optometry practices has limited access to ophthalmic
advice. Unfortunately, websites such as NHS 111 advocate visiting an optician if patients
have concerns regarding their vision.
In response to this, the ophthalmic community have raised concerns through the Royal
College of Ophthalmologists, the Macular Society, NHS 111 and NHS England to increase
awareness of the importance of presenting in a timely manner with sight threatening
conditions. There has also been increasing media coverage of concerns raised across
the medical profession that patients are not presenting or presenting too late with
life threatening conditions. Despite this, presentation rates remain well below those
expected. This has wide ranging implications on the long-term health of our population.
Ophthalmologists need to consider the hidden burden of ophthalmic disease when planning
their recovery strategies. It is likely that we will see a considerable increase in
emergency presentations which may be more advanced due to delayed presentation as
the lockdown is eased. Similarly, when optometry services resume it is likely that
we will see a further surge in ophthalmic referrals. It would be prudent to allow
for increased emergency work when planning recovery strategies to deal with the potential
back-log of known patients.