4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Role of Clinical Pharmacy in Preventing Prescribing Errors in the Emergency Department of a Governmental Hospital in Jordan: A Pre-Post Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Clinical pharmacists have a vital role in intercepting prescribing errors (PEs) but their impact within a Jordanian hospital emergency department (ED) has never been studied. Objective: To evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacy services on PEs and assess predictors of physicians’ acceptance of clinical pharmacists’ interventions. Setting: This study was conducted in the ED of the largest governmental hospital in Jordan. Method: This was a pre-post study conducted in October and November 2019 using a disguised observational method. There were 2 phases: control phase (P0) with no clinical interventions, and active phase (P1) where clinical pharmacists prospectively intervened upon errors. The clinical significance of errors was determined by a multidisciplinary committee. The SPSS software version 24 was used for data analysis. Main Outcome Measure: PEs incidence, type, severity, and predictors for physicians’ acceptance. Results: Of 18003 patients, 8732 were included in P0 and 9271 in P1. PEs incidence decreased from 24.6% to 5.4%. Contraindication, drug selection, and dosage form error types were significantly reduced from 32.6%, 9.1%, and 3.7% (P0) to 12.6%, 0.0%, and 0.0% (P1), respectively. Albeit not statistically significant, drug-drug interaction, drug frequency, and allergy error types were reduced from 4.9%, 3.1%, and 0.1% to 4.5%, 2.5%, and 0.0%, respectively. Significant and serious errors were significantly reduced from 68.7% and 3.0% (P0) to 8.9% and 1.8% (P1), respectively. During P1, most errors were minor (89.3%, 1574/1763), and lethal errors ceased. Predictors for physicians’ acceptance were: significant errors (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.6-4.3; P = 0.03) and non-busy physicians (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.7; P = 0.04). Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists significantly reduced PEs in the ED by 76%; most of interventions were significant. Policymakers are advised to implement active clinical pharmacy in the ED.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System

          (2000)
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            (View ORCID Profile)
            Journal
            Hospital Pharmacy
            Hosp Pharm
            SAGE Publications
            0018-5787
            1945-1253
            July 25 2020
            : 001857872094223
            Affiliations
            [1 ]Department of Pharmacology and Biomedical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan
            [2 ]Department of Clinical Sciences, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan
            [3 ]Department of Pharmacy Practice, Kuwait University, Kuwait
            [4 ]Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, The University of Manchester, UK
            [5 ]Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Sharjah, UAE
            Article
            10.1177/0018578720942231
            34732922
            2aa04680-d212-4fe9-b776-109e0bd1eb77
            © 2020

            http://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

            History

            Comments

            Comment on this article