44
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Renoprotective Mechanism of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Based on Transcriptomic Analysis in a Porcine Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a well-known phenomenon in which tissues are exposed to a brief period of ischemia prior to a longer ischemic event. This technique produces tissue tolerance to ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). Currently, IPC’s mechanism of action is poorly understood. Using a porcine single kidney model, we performed remote IPC with renal IRI and evaluated the IPC mechanism of action. Following left nephrectomy, 15 female Yorkshire pigs were divided into three groups: no IPC and 90 minutes of warm ischemia (control), remote IPC immediately followed by 90 minutes of warm ischemia (rIPCe), and remote IPC with 90 minutes of warm ischemia performed 24 hours later (rIPCl). Differential gene expression analysis was performed using a porcine-specific microarray. The microarray analysis of porcine renal tissues identified 1,053 differentially expressed probes in preconditioned pigs. Among these, 179 genes had altered expression in both the rIPCe and rIPCl groups. The genes were largely related to oxidation reduction, apoptosis, and inflammatory response. In the rIPCl group, an additional 848 genes had altered expression levels. These genes were primarily related to immune response and inflammation, including those coding for cytokines and cytokine receptors and those that play roles in the complement system and coagulation cascade. In the complement system, the membrane attack complex was determined to be sublytic, because it colocalized with phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Furthermore, alpha 2 macroglobulin, tissue plasminogen activator, uterine plasmin trypsin inhibitor, and arginase-1 mRNA levels were elevated in the rIPCl group. These findings indicate that remote IPC produces renoprotective effects through multiple mechanisms, and these effects develop over a long timeframe rather than immediately following IPC.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Preconditioning and postconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application.

          Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death world-wide. Its major pathophysiological manifestation is acute myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Innovative treatment strategies for protecting the myocardium against the detrimental effects of this form of injury are required in order to improve clinical outcomes in patients with CHD. In this regard, harnessing the endogenous protection elicited by the heart's ability to 'condition' itself, has recently emerged as a powerful new strategy for limiting myocardial injury, preserving left ventricular systolic function and potentially improving morbidity and mortality in patients with CHD. 'Conditioning' the heart to tolerate the effects of acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury can be initiated through the application of several different mechanical and pharmacological strategies. Inducing brief non-lethal episodes of ischaemia and reperfusion to the heart either prior to, during, or even after an episode of sustained lethal myocardial ischaemia has the capacity to dramatically reduce myocardial injury--a phenomenon termed ischaemic preconditioning (IPC), preconditioning or postconditioning, respectively. Intriguingly, similar levels of cardioprotection can be achieved by applying the brief episodes of non-lethal ischaemia and reperfusion to an organ or tissue remote from the heart, thereby obviating the need to 'condition' the heart directly. This phenomenon has been termed remote ischaemic 'conditioning', and it can offer widespread systemic protection to other organs which are susceptible to acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury such as the brain, liver, intestine or kidney. Furthermore, the identification of the signalling pathways which underlie the effects of 'conditioning', has provided novel targets for pharmacological agents allowing one to recapitulate the benefits of these cardioprotective phenomena--so-termed pharmacological preconditioning and postconditioning. Initial clinical studies, reporting beneficial effects of 'conditioning' the heart to tolerate acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury, have been encouraging. Larger multi-centred randomised studies are now required to determine whether these 'conditioning' strategies are able to impact on clinical outcomes. In this article, we provide an overview of 'conditioning' in all its various forms, describe the underlying mechanisms and review the recent clinical application of this emerging cardioprotective strategy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Ischemic Preconditioning in the Animal Kidney, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

            Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) is a potent renoprotective strategy which has not yet been translated successfully into clinical practice, in spite of promising results in animal studies. We performed a unique systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies to identify factors modifying IPC efficacy in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI), in order to enhance the design of future (clinical) studies. An electronic literature search for animal studies on IPC in renal IRI yielded fifty-eight studies which met our inclusion criteria. We extracted data for serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and histological renal damage, as well as study quality indicators. Meta-analysis showed that IPC reduces serum creatinine (SMD 1.54 [95%CI 1.16, 1.93]), blood urea nitrogen (SMD 1.42 [95% CI 0.97, 1.87]) and histological renal damage (SMD 1.12 [95% CI 0.89, 1.35]) after IRI as compared to controls. Factors influencing IPC efficacy were the window of protection (<24 h = early vs. ≥24 h = late) and animal species (rat vs. mouse). No difference in efficacy between local and remote IPC was observed. In conclusion, our findings show that IPC effectively reduces renal damage after IRI, with higher efficacy in the late window of protection. However, there is a large gap in study data concerning the optimal window of protection, and IPC efficacy may differ per animal species. Moreover, current clinical trials on RIPC may not be optimally designed, and our findings identify a need for further standardization of animal experiments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Remote ischemic preconditioning and renoprotection: from myth to a novel therapeutic option?

              There is currently no effective prophylactic regimen available to prevent contrast-induced AKI (CI-AKI), a frequent and life-threatening complication after cardiac catheterization. Therefore, novel treatment strategies are required to decrease CI-AKI incidence and to improve clinical outcomes in these patients. Remote ischemic preconditioning (rIPC), defined as transient brief episodes of ischemia at a remote site before a subsequent prolonged ischemia/reperfusion injury of the target organ, is an adaptational response that protects against ischemic and reperfusion insult. Indeed, several studies demonstrated the tissue-protective effects of rIPC in various target organs, including the kidneys. In this regard, rIPC may offer a novel noninvasive and virtually cost-free treatment strategy for decreasing CI-AKI incidence. This review evaluates the current experimental and clinical evidence for rIPC as a potential renoprotective strategy, and discusses the underlying mechanisms and key areas for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                21 October 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 10
                : e0141099
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam-si, Korea
                [3 ]Brain Korea 21 PLUS Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
                [4 ]Department of Urology, Ewha Women’s University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
                University of Colorado Denver, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: WKH. Performed the experiments: YEY KHC SYK YIC KSL WKH. Analyzed the data: YEY KHC SYK WKH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KHK SCY WKH. Wrote the paper: YEY KHC SYK WKH.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-24351
                10.1371/journal.pone.0141099
                4619554
                26489007
                2b240638-8977-4b8c-a457-c4df3e057a25
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 12 June 2015
                : 21 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 9, Tables: 0, Pages: 16
                Funding
                This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2012R1A1A1042968) funded by the Korea government (MEST).
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All microarray analysis files are available from the NCBI GEO database (Accession: GSE72646).

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article