19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Militant memocracy in International Relations: Mnemonical status anxiety and memory laws in Eastern Europe

      Review of International Studies
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article theorises the nexus between mnemonical status anxiety and militant memory laws. Extending the understanding of status-seeking in international relations to the realm of historical memory, I argue that the quest for mnemonical recognition is a status struggle in an international social hierarchy of remembering constitutive events of the past. A typology of mnemopolitical status-seeking is presented on the example of Russia ( mnemonical positionalism), Poland ( mnemonical revisionism), and Ukraine ( mnemonical self-emancipation). Memory laws provide a common instance of securing and/or improving a state's mnemonical standing in the relevant memory order. Drawing on the conceptual analogy of militant democracy, the article develops the notion militant memocracy, or the governance of historical memory through a dense network of prescribing and proscribing memory laws and policies. Similar to its militant democracy counterpart, militant memocracy is in danger of self-inflicted harm to the object of defence in the very effort to defend it: its precautionary and punitive measures resound rather than fix the state's mnemonical anxiety problem.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Modernity and self-identity. Self & society in the late modern age

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              A Cultural Theory of International Relations

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Review of International Studies
                Rev. Int. Stud.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0260-2105
                1469-9044
                October 2021
                April 12 2021
                October 2021
                : 47
                : 4
                : 489-507
                Article
                10.1017/S0260210521000140
                2be02948-7086-45dc-b2e6-f16d2455c05a
                © 2021

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article