7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Journal of Pain Research (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on reporting of high-quality laboratory and clinical findings in all fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Sign up for email alerts here.

      52,235 Monthly downloads/views I 2.832 Impact Factor I 4.5 CiteScore I 1.2 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.655 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Safe Opioid Storage and Disposal: A Survey of Patient Beliefs and Practices

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To evaluate knowledge, practices, and beliefs of US patients receiving prescription opioids regarding opioid storage, disposal, and diversion.

          Design

          Internet-based, cross-sectional survey conducted between September and October 2018. Fisher’s exact tests and Kendall’s Tau-c were used to assess associations with storage and disposal outcomes.

          Participants

          Patients aged ≥18 years with acute (n=250) or chronic noncancer (n=250) pain were prescribed an oral opioid within 90 days of the survey.

          Results

          Mean (SD) patient age was 48 (14.7) years, 57.2% were female, 82.6% lived with ≥1 person in the home, and 28.0% had remaining/unused pills. One-third of all patients received safe opioid storage (35.2%) and/or disposal (31.4%) counseling from a healthcare provider, while 50.0% received neither storage nor disposal information. Only 27.4% of all patients stored their opioids in a locked location, and 17.9% of those with remaining/unused pills disposed of their medication. Patients who received any opioid counseling were more likely to keep their medication in a locked location compared with those who did not (42.4% vs 12.4%, respectively; P<0.0001), as were those who perceived any risk of opioid diversion in the home compared with those who perceived no risk or were unsure (53.7% vs 24.2%, respectively; P<0.0001). Disposal rates did not differ based on counseling received (20.8% counseled vs 16.1% not counseled; P=0.5011) or perceived diversion risk (27.8% perceived any risk vs 16.4% perceived no risk or unsure; P=0.3166).

          Conclusion

          The proportion of patients receiving prescription opioids who receive safe storage/disposal counseling from a healthcare provider appears suboptimal. Further research is warranted to develop effective ways to improve patient opioid storage/disposal education and practices.

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Prescription Opioid Use, Misuse, and Use Disorders in U.S. Adults: 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prescription Opioid Analgesics Commonly Unused After Surgery

            Prescription opioid analgesics play an important role in the treatment of postoperative pain; however, unused opioids may be diverted for nonmedical use and contribute to opioid-related injuries and deaths.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Time allocation in primary care office visits.

              To use an innovative videotape analysis method to examine how clinic time was spent during elderly patients' visits to primary care physicians. Secondary objectives were to identify the factors that influence time allocations. A convenience sample of 392 videotapes of routine office visits conducted between 1998 and 2000 from multiple primary care practices in the United States, supplemented by patient and physician surveys. Videotaped visits were examined for visit length and time devoted to specific topics--a novel approach to study time allocation. A survival analysis model analyzed the effects of patient, physician, and physician practice setting on how clinic time was spent. Very limited amount of time was dedicated to specific topics in office visits. The median visit length was 15.7 minutes covering a median of six topics. About 5 minutes were spent on the longest topic whereas the remaining topics each received 1.1 minutes. While time spent by patient and physician on a topic responded to many factors, length of the visit overall varied little even when contents of visits varied widely. Macro factors associated with each site had more influence on visit and topic length than the nature of the problem patients presented. Many topics compete for visit time, resulting in small amount of time being spent on each topic. A highly regimented schedule might interfere with having sufficient time for patients with complex or multiple problems. Efforts to improve the quality of care need to recognize the time pressure on both patients and physicians, the effects of financial incentives, and the time costs of improving patient-physician interactions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Pain Res
                J Pain Res
                JPR
                jpainres
                Journal of Pain Research
                Dove
                1178-7090
                11 May 2020
                2020
                : 13
                : 987-995
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Simon-Kucher & Partners , Cambridge, MA, USA
                [2 ]Daiichi Sankyo, Inc ., Basking Ridge, NJ, USA
                [3 ]Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School , Newark, NJ, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Razmic Gregorian Simon-Kucher & Partners, Strategy and Marketing Consultants, LLC , 201 Washington Street, Suite 3301, Boston, MA02108, USATel +1617-231-4500Fax +1617-576-2751 Email Razmic.Gregorian@simon-kucher.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-6455
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7692-1274
                Article
                242825
                10.2147/JPR.S242825
                7231783
                32494187
                2cc54ec4-20ff-494e-9de1-847f65525787
                © 2020 Gregorian et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 18 December 2019
                : 16 April 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 4, References: 19, Pages: 9
                Funding
                This study was sponsored by Daiichi-Sankyo. Medical editorial assistance was provided by Larry Radican, PhD, MPH, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by Daiichi-Sankyo.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                surveys,misuse,diversion,abuse,opioids
                Anesthesiology & Pain management
                surveys, misuse, diversion, abuse, opioids

                Comments

                Comment on this article