2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Consumer Segmentation Study for Meat and Meat Alternatives in Switzerland

      research-article
      * ,
      Foods
      MDPI
      meat consumption, meat alternatives, market segmentation, cluster analysis, Switzerland

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to identify consumer groups regarding meat and meat alternatives, which are homogeneous in themselves but very different from one another. To date, the literature has analysed the attitudes towards, and the motives behind, the consumption of meat and meat alternatives. However, segmentation research portraying homogeneous consumer groups that are consuming or willing to consume meat alternatives is lacking. This study closes this research gap and, in doing so, also shows how meat consumption is related to the consumption of alternative products. A questionnaire was sent out to a random sample in the German- and French-speaking parts of Switzerland, resulting in 561 responses. A hierarchical cluster analysis using seven scales revealed six distinct consumer groups, which covered all types of consumers, from the uncompromising meat-eater to the health-conscious meat avoider. The results show that meat alternatives are not always consumed as a substitute for meat but can also be a complementary component in one’s diet. This study contributes to the scientific literature by providing useful information for the food industry involved in producing and marketing meat and meat alternatives to different target groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reflections on Past Behavior: A Self-Report Index of Habit Strength1

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance.

              What does it take to increase the consumption of meat substitutes and attract new consumers? We identified main barriers and drivers by a consumer survey (n=553) in the U.K. and the Netherlands. Person-related factors (food neophobia and food choice motives) and product-related attitudes and beliefs towards meat and meat substitutes were compared between non-users (n=324), light/medium-users (n=133) and heavy-users of meat substitutes (n=96). Consumer acceptance was largely determined by the attitudes and beliefs towards meat substitutes and food neophobia. Key barriers for non-users and light/medium-users were the unfamiliarity with meat substitutes and the lower sensory attractiveness compared to meat. In addition, non-users had a higher tendency to avoid new foods. Hence, the less consumers were using meat substitutes, the more they wanted these products to be similar to meat. Although non-users and light/medium-users did recognize the ethical and weight-control aspects of meat substitutes, this was obviously less relevant to them. Actually, only heavy-users had high motivations to choose ethical foods, which explains their choice for meat substitutes. In order to make meat substitutes more attractive to meat consumers, we would not recommend to focus on communication of ethical arguments, but to significantly improve the sensory quality and resemblance to meat.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Foods
                Foods
                foods
                Foods
                MDPI
                2304-8158
                03 June 2021
                June 2021
                : 10
                : 6
                : 1273
                Affiliations
                School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences HAFL, Bern University of Applied Sciences BFH, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland; thomas.brunner@ 123456bfh.ch
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-0880
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-6548
                Article
                foods-10-01273
                10.3390/foods10061273
                8229998
                2d6d9826-3a90-4f3a-9b86-ae13c0c8b297
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 May 2021
                : 01 June 2021
                Categories
                Article

                meat consumption,meat alternatives,market segmentation,cluster analysis,switzerland

                Comments

                Comment on this article