Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

This study sought to investigate pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus and their impact on prosthesis selection by computed tomography (CT). Precise noninvasive prosthesis sizing is a prerequisite for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. A total of 110 patients with severe aortic stenosis (mean age: 82.9 ± 8 years, mean aortic valve area: 0.69 ± 0.18 cm(2)) underwent electrocardiogram-gated CT. Aortic annulus dimensions were planimetrically quantified as area-derived diameter (D(A) = 2 ×✓(CSA/π), where CSA is the cross-sectional area) and perimeter-derived diameter (D(P) = P/π, where P is the length of the perimeter) in 5% increments of the RR interval. Hypothetical prosthesis sizing was based on D(A) and D(P) (23-mm prosthesis for <22 mm; 26 mm: 22 to 25 mm; 29 mm: >25 mm) and compared between maximum and traditional cardiac CT reconstruction phases at 35% and 75% of RR. Agreement for prosthesis selection was calculated by κ statistics. D(A) and D(P) were increased and eccentricity was reduced during systole, with D(A-MAX) and D(P-MAX) most often observed at 20% of RR. D(P) was consistently larger than D(A). Average net differences were 2.0 ± 0.6 mm and 1.7 ± 0.5 mm by D(A-MIN) versus D(A-MAX) and D(P-MIN) versus D(P-MAX). Agreement for prosthesis sizing was found in 93 of 110 patients (κ = 0.75) by D(A-75%) and in 80 of 110 patients (κ = 0.53) by D(A-MAX) compared with D(A-35%); and in 94 of 110 patients (κ = 0.73) by D(P-75%) and in 93 of 110 patients (κ = 0.73) by D(P-MAX) compared with D(P-35%). With sizing by D(A-75%) or D(P-75%), nominal prosthesis diameter was smaller than D(A-MAX) or D(P-MAX) in 15 and 6 patients respectively. Aortic annulus morphology exhibits conformational pulsatile changes throughout the cardiac cycle due to deformation and stretch. These changes affect prosthesis selection. Prosthesis selection by diastolic perimeter- or area-derived dimensions harbors the risk of undersizing. Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.