20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A scoping review of ICD-11 adjustment disorder research Translated title: Una revisión panorámica sobre la investigación del trastorno de adaptación en la CIE 11 Translated title: 对ICD-11适应障碍研究的审视综述

      review-article
      , , , ,
      European Journal of Psychotraumatology
      Taylor & Francis
      Adjustment disorder, ICD-11, review, validation, assessment, treatment, Trastorno adaptativo, CIE 11, validación, evaluación, tratamiento, 适应障碍, ICD-11综述, 验证, 评估, 治疗, • Significant revisions of adjustment disorder definition are included in ICD-11.• Findings from the validation studies of the ICD-11 proposals are ambiguous.• A new measure of the ICD-11 adjustment disorder is available and is currently undergoing validation in various samples.• Low intensity self-help interventions for the ICD-11 adjustment disorder show promising outcomes.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background: Adjustment disorder (AjD) is one of the most used mental disorder diagnoses among mental health professionals. Important revisions of the AjD definition in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) are proposed. AjD is included in a chapter of disorders specifically associated with stress in ICD-11.

          Objective: This paper aims to review recent developments in ICD-11 AjD research, and to discuss the available ICD-11 AjD diagnosis validation studies, AjD measures, treatment studies, and outline the future perspectives for AjD research and clinical practice.

          Methods: In total, 10 empirical studies of AjD ICD-11 were identified and included in this review. We searched for studies in Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, PILOTS, SocINDEX, and via additional search by contacting authors of published empirical studies and reference screening.

          Results: Review of the studies revealed a lack of validation studies of the ICD-11 AjD symptom structure. AjD validation study findings are ambiguous, and there is still little support for the proposed two symptom structure of AjD for the ICD-11. A self-report AjD measure ‘Adjustment Disorder New Module’ (ADNM) based on the ICD-11 definition has been developed and used in all 10 reviewed studies. Two self-help interventions have been developed for the ICD-11 AjD, and findings from these studies indicate that self-help low-intensity cognitive-behavioural interventions, delivered via bibliography or internet-based, might be effective treatment of AjD.

          Conclusions: The AjD definition in ICD-11 with a description of a new symptom profile facilitates AjD measurement and AjD-focused treatment developments. More studies and insights from clinical practice are needed to move the field of AjD research and practice forward.

          Contexto: El trastorno de adaptación o adaptativo (TA) se encuentra entre los diagnósticos de trastorno mental más usados entre los profesionales de la salud mental. Se proponen revisiones importantes de la definición de T. adaptativo de la 11ª edición de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (ICD 11). El T. adaptativo está incluido en la CIE 11 en un capitulo de trastornos específicamente asociados con el estrés.

          Objetivo: Este articulo pretende revisar desarrollos recientes sobre la investigación del T. adaptativo en la CIE 11 así como discutir los estudios de validación del diagnostico del mismo para la CIE 11. También medidas del T. adaptativo, estudios sobre tratamiento y la delineación de perspectivas futuras de la investigación sobre el T. adaptativo y la práctica clínica.

          Métodos: En total, fueron identificados e incluidos en esta revisión, 10 estudios empíricos sobre el T. adaptativo para la CIE 11. Revisamos la presencia de trabajos en las bases Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, PILOTS, SocINDEX y a través de una vía adicional contactando a los autores de estudios empíricos publicados. También se realizó una discriminación de referencias bibliográficas.

          Resultados: La revisión de los estudios revelaron una falta de estudios de validación de la estructura de síntomas para el T. adaptativo en la CIE 11. Los hallazgos de los estudios de validación son ambiguos, y todavía hay un soporte escaso para la propuesta estructura en dos síntomas del T. adaptativo en la CIE 11. Ha sido desarrollado un autoreporte de la medida del T. adaptativo denominada ‘Nuevo modulo del T. adaptativo’ (ADNM) basada en la definición de la CIE 11. Ha sido usada en todos los 10 trabajos revisados. Han sido desarrolladas dos intervenciones de autoayuda para el T. adaptativo de la CIE 11 y los hallazgos obtenidos por estos estudios indican que las intervenciones de autoayuda de baja intensidad, cognitivo – conductuales, administradas vía bibliografía o por Internet, pueden ser un tratamiento efectivo para el T. adaptativo.

          Conclusiones: La definición de T. adaptativo en la CIE 11, con la descripción de un nuevo perfil sintomatológico, facilita la medida del T. adaptativo y los desarrollos del tratamiento focalizado en el trastorno. Se necesitan más estudios y experiencias desde la práctica clínica para impulsar hacia delante el campo de la investigación y práctica del diagnóstico del T. adaptativo.

          背景:适应障碍(AjD)是精神健康专家最常用的精神疾病诊断。在《第11版国际疾病分类》(ICD-11)中提出了对 AjD 定义的一些重要修订。AjD在 ICD-11中被涵括在与应激有关障碍的章节中。

          目标:本文旨在综述最近关于ICD-11 AjD的研究进展,同时对已有的ICD-11 AjD诊断验证、测量和治疗研究进行讨论,并提出AjD研究和临床实践的未来前景。

          方法:共有10个关于ICD-11 AjD 的实证研究被检索识别,并包括在本综述中。我们在 Embase,PubMed,PsycINFO,Scopus,PILOTS,SocINDEX中检索研究,也通过联系已发表的实证研究的作者和参考文献筛选来作为额外补充检索。

          结果:这些研究的综述显示ICD-11 AjD 症状结构缺乏验证研究。AjD验证研究发现是模糊不清的,而且ICD-11中提议的AjD症状结构的支持较少。一个基于ICD-11定义的AjD自评测量《适应障碍新模块(ADNM)》 被开发并使用在所有10个研究中。两种自助干预方法被用于ICD-11 AjD,研究结果表明通过参考书目或者网络进行的自助式的低强度认知行为干预可能对AjD有效。

          结论:ICD-11的AjD定义描述了一个新的症状侧写,促进了AjD的测量和治疗的发展。需要更多研究和来自临床的见解来推动AjD领域的研究和实践。

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The WPA-WHO Global Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Towards Mental Disorders Classification.

          This article describes the results of the WPA-WHO Global Survey of 4,887 psychiatrists in 44 countries regarding their use of diagnostic classification systems in clinical practice, and the desirable characteristics of a classification of mental disorders. The WHO will use these results to improve the clinical utility of the ICD classification of mental disorders through the current ICD-10 revision process. Participants indicated that the most important purposes of a classification are to facilitate communication among clinicians and to inform treatment and management. They overwhelmingly preferred a simpler system with 100 or fewer categories, and over two-thirds preferred flexible guidance to a strict criteria-based approach. Opinions were divided about how to incorporate severity and functional status, while most respondents were receptive to a system that incorporates a dimensional component. Significant minorities of psychiatrists in Latin America and Asia reported problems with the cross-cultural applicability of existing classifications. Overall, ratings of ease of use and goodness of fit for specific ICD-10 categories were fairly high, but several categories were described as having poor utility in clinical practice. This represents an important focus for the ICD revision, as does ensuring that the ICD-11 classification of mental disorders is acceptable to psychiatrists throughout the world.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychologists' perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey

            This study examined psychologists' views and practices regarding diagnostic classification systems for mental and behavioral disorders so as to inform the development of the ICD-11 by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO and the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) conducted a multilingual survey of 2155 psychologists from 23 countries, recruited through their national psychological associations. Sixty percent of global psychologists routinely used a formal classification system, with ICD-10 used most frequently by 51% and DSM-IV by 44%. Psychologists viewed informing treatment decisions and facilitating communication as the most important purposes of classification, and preferred flexible diagnostic guidelines to strict criteria. Clinicians favorably evaluated most diagnostic categories, but identified a number of problematic diagnoses. Substantial percentages reported problems with crosscultural applicability and cultural bias, especially among psychologists outside the USA and Europe. Findings underscore the priority of clinical utility and professional and cultural differences in international psychology. Implications for ICD-11 development and dissemination are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and validation of a self-report for the assessment of adjustment disorders.

              Based on a recent diagnostic proposal for adjustment disorders a self-report assessment was developed. The current study reports validation results. Psychometric properties were examined using two different samples of 687 patients with cardiac arrhythmias and 86 patients from a psychosomatic outpatient clinic. Besides evaluating the internal structure and re-test reliability, associations with quality of life, general anxiety and depression, symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and coping strategies were analyzed. The factor analysis confirmed the three postulated factors: intrusion, avoidance and failure to adapt. The internal consistencies for these three scales were between α = 0.74 and 0.91. The re-rest reliability of the scales for a six-week period lay between r(tt) = 0.61 and 0.84. Medium-sized correlations were found between the scales with general anxiety and depression as well as posttraumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, the scales correlated with emotion-oriented and somewhat with proactive coping, but not with task-oriented or avoidance-oriented coping strategies. It is concluded that the self-report on adjustment disorders enables new possibilities to investigate further previously under-researched adjustment disorders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Psychotraumatol
                Eur J Psychotraumatol
                ZEPT
                zept20
                European Journal of Psychotraumatology
                Taylor & Francis
                2000-8066
                2017
                18 January 2018
                : 8
                : sup7 , ESTSS Highlights 2017 – Child Maltreatment Across the Lifespan
                : 1421819
                Affiliations
                [ a ] Department of Clinical and Organizational Psychology, Vilnius University , Vilnius, Lithuania
                [ b ] Department of Psychology, Division of Psychopathology and Clinical Intervention, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [ c ] Department of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Universitat Jaume I , Castellon de la Plana, Spain
                Author notes
                CONTACT Evaldas Kazlauskas evaldas.kazlauskas@ 123456fsf.vu.lt Department of Clinical and Organizational Psychology, Vilnius University , Universiteto str. 9, Vilnius 01513, Lithuania
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6654-6220
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-5661
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6925-3266
                Article
                1421819
                10.1080/20008198.2017.1421819
                5774403
                29372011
                2e114abf-e273-4264-95a4-ad8129735d8e
                © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 July 2017
                : 15 December 2017
                Page count
                Tables: 1, References: 27, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Article

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                adjustment disorder,icd-11,review,validation,assessment,treatment,trastorno adaptativo,cie 11,validación,evaluación,tratamiento,适应障碍,icd-11综述,验证,评估,治疗,• significant revisions of adjustment disorder definition are included in icd-11.• findings from the validation studies of the icd-11 proposals are ambiguous.• a new measure of the icd-11 adjustment disorder is available and is currently undergoing validation in various samples.• low intensity self-help interventions for the icd-11 adjustment disorder show promising outcomes.

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content168

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors331