22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Steel Rack Connections: Identification of Most Influential Factors and a Comparison of Stiffness Design Methods

      research-article
      , * , ,
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Steel pallet rack (SPR) beam-to-column connections (BCCs) are largely responsible to avoid the sway failure of frames in the down-aisle direction. The overall geometry of beam end connectors commercially used in SPR BCCs is different and does not allow a generalized analytic approach for all types of beam end connectors; however, identifying the effects of the configuration, profile and sizes of the connection components could be the suitable approach for the practical design engineers in order to predict the generalized behavior of any SPR BCC. This paper describes the experimental behavior of SPR BCCs tested using a double cantilever test set-up. Eight sets of specimens were identified based on the variation in column thickness, beam depth and number of tabs in the beam end connector in order to investigate the most influential factors affecting the connection performance. Four tests were repeatedly performed for each set to bring uniformity to the results taking the total number of tests to thirty-two. The moment-rotation (M-θ) behavior, load-strain relationship, major failure modes and the influence of selected parameters on connection performance were investigated. A comparative study to calculate the connection stiffness was carried out using the initial stiffness method, the slope to half-ultimate moment method and the equal area method. In order to find out the more appropriate method, the mean stiffness of all the tested connections and the variance in values of mean stiffness according to all three methods were calculated. The calculation of connection stiffness by means of the initial stiffness method is considered to overestimate the values when compared to the other two methods. The equal area method provided more consistent values of stiffness and lowest variance in the data set as compared to the other two methods.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Editor
          Journal
          PLoS One
          PLoS ONE
          plos
          plosone
          PLoS ONE
          Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
          1932-6203
          9 October 2015
          2015
          : 10
          : 10
          : e0139422
          Affiliations
          [001]Department of Civil Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
          China Medical University, TAIWAN
          Author notes

          Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

          Conceived and designed the experiments: SNRS NHRS MZJ. Performed the experiments: SNRS MS. Analyzed the data: SNRS NHRS MS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MZJ NHRS. Wrote the paper: SNRS NHRS.

          ‡ These authors have made real and concrete contributions to the manuscript.

          Article
          PONE-D-15-26925
          10.1371/journal.pone.0139422
          4599833
          26452047
          2e20c59b-e491-4aae-afcd-0c389fda8d35
          Copyright @ 2015

          This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

          History
          : 19 June 2015
          : 14 September 2015
          Page count
          Figures: 12, Tables: 6, Pages: 19
          Funding
          This study was supported by the University of Malaya Higher Impact Research (UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/57) and PPP grant (project no. PG055/2013B). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
          Categories
          Research Article
          Custom metadata
          All relevant data are within the paper.

          Uncategorized
          Uncategorized

          Comments

          Comment on this article