54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Implications of Rho GTPase Signaling in Glioma Cell Invasion and Tumor Progression

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Glioblastoma (GB) is the most malignant of primary adult brain tumors, characterized by a highly locally invasive cell population, as well as abundant proliferative cells, neoangiogenesis, and necrosis. Clinical intervention with chemotherapy or radiation may either promote or establish an environment for manifestation of invasive behavior. Understanding the molecular drivers of invasion in the context of glioma progression may be insightful in directing new treatments for patients with GB. Here, we review current knowledge on Rho family GTPases, their aberrant regulation in GB, and their effect on GB cell invasion and tumor progression. Rho GTPases are modulators of cell migration through effects on actin cytoskeleton rearrangement; in non-neoplastic tissue, expression and activation of Rho GTPases are normally under tight regulation. In GB, Rho GTPases are deregulated, often via hyperactivity or overexpression of their activators, Rho GEFs. Downstream effectors of Rho GTPases have been shown to promote invasiveness and, importantly, glioma cell survival. The study of aberrant Rho GTPase signaling in GB is thus an important investigation of cell invasion as well as treatment resistance and disease progression.

          Related collections

          Most cited references123

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis.

          Previously undescribed prognostic subclasses of high-grade astrocytoma are identified and discovered to resemble stages in neurogenesis. One tumor class displaying neuronal lineage markers shows longer survival, while two tumor classes enriched for neural stem cell markers display equally short survival. Poor prognosis subclasses exhibit markers either of proliferation or of angiogenesis and mesenchyme. Upon recurrence, tumors frequently shift toward the mesenchymal subclass. Chromosomal locations of genes distinguishing tumor subclass parallel DNA copy number differences between subclasses. Functional relevance of tumor subtype molecular signatures is suggested by the ability of cell line signatures to predict neurosphere growth. A robust two-gene prognostic model utilizing PTEN and DLL3 expression suggests that Akt and Notch signaling are hallmarks of poor prognosis versus better prognosis gliomas, respectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors.

            Actin stress fibers are one of the major cytoskeletal structures in fibroblasts and are linked to the plasma membrane at focal adhesions. rho, a ras-related GTP-binding protein, rapidly stimulated stress fiber and focal adhesion formation when microinjected into serum-starved Swiss 3T3 cells. Readdition of serum produced a similar response, detectable within 2 min. This activity was due to a lysophospholipid, most likely lysophosphatidic acid, bound to serum albumin. Other growth factors including PDGF induced actin reorganization initially to form membrane ruffles, and later, after 5 to 10 min, stress fibers. For all growth factors tested the stimulation of focal adhesion and stress fiber assembly was inhibited when endogenous rho function was blocked, whereas membrane ruffling was unaffected. These data imply that rho is essential specifically for the coordinated assembly of focal adhesions and stress fibers induced by growth factors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion

              The GTPases Rac1, RhoA and Cdc42 act in concert to control cytoskeleton dynamics1-3. Recent biosensor studies have shown that all three GTPases are activated at the front of migrating cells4-7 and biochemical evidence suggests that they may regulate one another: Cdc42 can activate Rac18, and Rac1 and RhoA are mutually inhibitory9-12. However, their spatiotemporal coordination, at the seconds and single micron dimensions typical of individual protrusion events, remains unknown. Here, we examine GTPase coordination both through simultaneous visualization of two GTPase biosensors and using a “computational multiplexing” approach capable of defining the relationships between multiple protein activities visualized in separate experiments. We found that RhoA is activated at the cell edge synchronous with edge advancement, whereas Cdc42 and Rac1 are activated 2 μm behind the edge with a delay of 40 sec. This indicates that Rac1 and RhoA operate antagonistically through spatial separation and precise timing, and that RhoA plays a role in the initial events of protrusion, while Rac1 and Cdc42 activate pathways implicated in reinforcement and stabilization of newly expanded protrusions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                30 July 2013
                04 October 2013
                2013
                : 3
                : 241
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute , Phoenix, AZ, USA
                [2] 2Cancer Biology Graduate Interdisciplinary Program, University of Arizona , Tucson, AZ, USA
                [3] 3Center for Oncology and Cell Biology, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at North Shore-LIJ , Manhasset, NY, USA
                Author notes

                Edited by: Giuseppe Merla, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Italy

                Reviewed by: Lucia Micale, IRCCS, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, Italy; Priam Villalonga, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain

                *Correspondence: Nhan L. Tran, Translational Genomics Research Institute, 445 N 5th Street, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA e-mail: ntran@ 123456tgen.org

                This article was submitted to Cancer Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology.

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2013.00241
                3790103
                24109588
                2e8ca85f-e6f8-465a-813f-14462b84c7da
                Copyright © 2013 Fortin Ensign, Mathews, Symons, Berens and Tran.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 12 July 2013
                : 02 September 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 151, Pages: 11, Words: 10067
                Categories
                Oncology
                Review Article

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                glioblastoma,invasion,survival,rhogtpase,rac1,cdc42,rhoa,gefs
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                glioblastoma, invasion, survival, rhogtpase, rac1, cdc42, rhoa, gefs

                Comments

                Comment on this article