Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multivariable Model to Predict an ACTH Stimulation Test to Diagnose Adrenal Insufficiency Using Previous Test Results

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Context

          The adrenocorticotropin hormone stimulation test (AST) is used to diagnose adrenal insufficiency, and is often repeated in patients when monitoring recovery of the hypothalamo–pituitary–adrenal axis.

          Objective

          To develop and validate a prediction model that uses previous AST results with new baseline cortisol to predict the result of a new AST.

          Methods

          This was a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study in patients who had undergone at least 2 ASTs, using polynomial regression with backwards variable selection, at a Tertiary UK adult endocrinology center. Model was developed from 258 paired ASTs over 5 years in 175 adults (mean age 52.4 years, SD 16.4), then validated on data from 111 patients over 1 year (51.8, 17.5) from the same center, data collected after model development. Candidate prediction variables included previous test baseline adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), previous test baseline and 30-minute cortisol, days between tests, and new baseline ACTH and cortisol used with calculated cortisol/ACTH ratios to assess 8 candidate predictors. The main outcome measure was a new test cortisol measured 30 minutes after Synacthen administration.

          Results

          Using 258 sequential ASTs from 175 patients for model development and 111 patient tests for model validation, previous baseline cortisol, previous 30-minute cortisol and new baseline cortisol were superior at predicting new 30-minute cortisol ( R 2 = 0.71 [0.49-0.93], area under the curve [AUC] = 0.97 [0.94-1.0]) than new baseline cortisol alone ( R 2 = 0.53 [0.22-0.84], AUC = 0.88 [0.81-0.95]).

          Conclusion

          Results of a previous AST can be objectively combined with new early-morning cortisol to predict the results of a new AST better than new early-morning cortisol alone. An online calculator is available at https://endocrinology.shinyapps.io/sheffield_sst_calculator/ for external validation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

          Multivariable regression models are powerful tools that are used frequently in studies of clinical outcomes. These models can use a mixture of categorical and continuous variables and can handle partially observed (censored) responses. However, uncritical application of modelling techniques can result in models that poorly fit the dataset at hand, or, even more likely, inaccurately predict outcomes on new subjects. One must know how to measure qualities of a model's fit in order to avoid poorly fitted or overfitted models. Measurement of predictive accuracy can be difficult for survival time data in the presence of censoring. We discuss an easily interpretable index of predictive discrimination as well as methods for assessing calibration of predicted survival probabilities. Both types of predictive accuracy should be unbiasedly validated using bootstrapping or cross-validation, before using predictions in a new data series. We discuss some of the hazards of poorly fitted and overfitted regression models and present one modelling strategy that avoids many of the problems discussed. The methods described are applicable to all regression models, but are particularly needed for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes. Methods are illustrated with a survival analysis in prostate cancer using Cox regression.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement

            Prediction models are developed to aid health care providers in estimating the probability or risk that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic models) or that a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic models), to inform their decision making. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that the quality of reporting of prediction model studies is poor. Only with full and clear reporting of information on all aspects of a prediction model can risk of bias and potential usefulness of prediction models be adequately assessed. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. This article describes how the TRIPOD Statement was developed. An extensive list of items based on a review of the literature was created, which was reduced after a Web-based survey and revised during a 3-day meeting in June 2011 with methodologists, health care professionals, and journal editors. The list was refined during several meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contributors. The resulting TRIPOD Statement is a checklist of 22 items, deemed essential for transparent reporting of a prediction model study. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. The TRIPOD Statement is best used in conjunction with the TRIPOD explanation and elaboration document. To aid the editorial process and readers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission (also available at www.tripod-statement.org). Editors’ note: In order to encourage dissemination of the TRIPOD Statement, this article is freely accessible on the Annals of Internal Medicine Web site (www.annals.org) and will be also published in BJOG, British Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Surgery, BMC Medicine, British Medical Journal, Circulation, Diabetic Medicine, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, European Urology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The authors jointly hold the copyright of this article. An accompanying Explanation and Elaboration article is freely available only on www.annals.org; Annals of Internal Medicine holds copyright for that article.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

              This clinical practice guideline addresses the diagnosis and treatment of primary adrenal insufficiency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Endocr Soc
                J Endocr Soc
                jes
                Journal of the Endocrine Society
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2472-1972
                02 November 2023
                07 October 2023
                07 October 2023
                : 7
                : 12
                : bvad127
                Affiliations
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Paediatric Endocrinology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield S10 2TH, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Endocrinology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
                Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University Hospitals NHS Trust , Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University Hospitals NHS Trust , Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
                Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford , Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Endocrinology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Paediatric Endocrinology Department, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield S10 2TH, UK
                Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
                Endocrinology Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Sheffield S10 2JF, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Neil Lawrence, BEng, MBChB, MRCPCH, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Room EU28, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK. Email: n.r.lawrence@ 123456sheffield.ac.uk .

                Charlotte J Elder and Miguel Debono joint senior authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7686-6172
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9932-0941
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-5735
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9365-8586
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-8533
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-5493
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-9678
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-5593
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-9702
                Article
                bvad127
                10.1210/jendso/bvad127
                10628819
                2f0211ac-27b9-4812-a31f-1cd679c26848
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 August 2023
                : 01 October 2023
                : 02 November 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute for Health and Social Care Research;
                Award ID: NIHR302559 2023-2025
                Funded by: UKRI Biomedical Sciences Innovation Scholar secondment;
                Award ID: MR/W002795/1
                Categories
                Clinical Research Article
                AcademicSubjects/MED00250

                adrenal insufficiency,short synacthen test,adrenocorticotropin stimulation test,predictive model,cortisol

                Comments

                Comment on this article