13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bosutinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BFORE trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This analysis from the multicenter, open-label, phase 3 BFORE trial reports efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) after five years’ follow-up. Patients were randomized to 400-mg once-daily bosutinib ( n = 268) or imatinib ( n = 268; three untreated). At study completion, 59.7% of bosutinib- and 58.1% of imatinib-treated patients remained on study treatment. Median duration of treatment and time on study was 55 months in both groups. Cumulative major molecular response (MMR) rate by 5 years was higher with bosutinib versus imatinib (73.9% vs. 64.6%; odds ratio, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.08–2.28]), as were cumulative MR 4 (58.2% vs. 48.1%; 1.50 [1.07–2.12]) and MR 4.5 (47.4% vs. 36.6%; 1.57 [1.11–2.22]) rates. Superior MR with bosutinib versus imatinib was consistent across Sokal risk groups, with greatest benefit seen in patients with high risk. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were consistent with 12-month data. After 5 years of follow-up there was an increase in the incidence of cardiac, effusion, renal, and vascular TEAEs in bosutinib- and imatinib-treated patients, but overall, no new safety signals were identified. These final results support 400-mg once-daily bosutinib as standard-of-care in patients with newly diagnosed CP CML.

          This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02130557.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

          Treatment with dasatinib, a highly potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, has resulted in high rates of complete cytogenetic response and progression-free survival among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase, after failure of imatinib treatment. We assessed the efficacy and safety of dasatinib, as compared with imatinib, for the first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML. In a multinational study, 519 patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML were randomly assigned to receive dasatinib at a dose of 100 mg once daily (259 patients) or imatinib at a dose of 400 mg once daily (260 patients). The primary end point was complete cytogenetic response by 12 months, confirmed on two consecutive assessments at least 28 days apart. Secondary end points, including major molecular response, were tested at a significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple comparisons. After a minimum follow-up of 12 months, the rate of confirmed complete cytogenetic response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (77% vs. 66%, P=0.007), as was the rate of complete cytogenetic response observed on at least one assessment (83% vs. 72%, P=0.001). The rate of major molecular response was higher with dasatinib than with imatinib (46% vs. 28%, P<0.0001), and responses were achieved in a shorter time with dasatinib (P<0.0001). Progression to the accelerated or blastic phase of CML occurred in 5 patients who were receiving dasatinib (1.9%) and in 9 patients who were receiving imatinib (3.5%). The safety profiles of the two treatments were similar. Dasatinib, administered once daily, as compared with imatinib, administered once daily, induced significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response and major molecular response. Since achieving complete cytogenetic response within 12 months has been associated with better long-term, progression-free survival, dasatinib may improve the long-term outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00481247.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia.

            Nilotinib has been shown to be a more potent inhibitor of BCR-ABL than imatinib. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib, as compared with imatinib, in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the chronic phase. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study, we assigned 846 patients with chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive nilotinib (at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily) or imatinib (at a dose of 400 mg once daily). The primary end point was the rate of major molecular response at 12 months. At 12 months, the rates of major molecular response for nilotinib (44% for the 300-mg dose and 43% for the 400-mg dose) were nearly twice that for imatinib (22%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The rates of complete cytogenetic response by 12 months were significantly higher for nilotinib (80% for the 300-mg dose and 78% for the 400-mg dose) than for imatinib (65%) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Patients receiving either the 300-mg dose or the 400-mg dose of nilotinib twice daily had a significant improvement in the time to progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis, as compared with those receiving imatinib (P=0.01 and P=0.004, respectively). No patient with progression to the accelerated phase or blast crisis had a major molecular response. Gastrointestinal and fluid-retention events were more frequent among patients receiving imatinib, whereas dermatologic events and headache were more frequent in those receiving nilotinib. Discontinuations due to aminotransferase and bilirubin elevations were low in all three study groups. Nilotinib at a dose of either 300 mg or 400 mg twice daily was superior to imatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00471497.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial.

              We report the 5-year analysis from the phase III Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients (DASISION) trial, evaluating long-term efficacy and safety outcomes of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) treated with dasatinib or imatinib.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                tbruemmendorf@ukaachen.de
                Journal
                Leukemia
                Leukemia
                Leukemia
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                0887-6924
                1476-5551
                28 May 2022
                28 May 2022
                2022
                : 36
                : 7
                : 1825-1833
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.412301.5, ISNI 0000 0000 8653 1507, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, ; Aachen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.410427.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2284 9329, Georgia Cancer Center, ; Augusta, GA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.413629.b, ISNI 0000 0001 0705 4923, Hammersmith Hospital, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.7563.7, ISNI 0000 0001 2174 1754, University of Milano-Bicocca, ; Monza, Italy
                [5 ]GRID grid.10025.36, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8470, Department of Molecular & Clinical Cancer Medicine, , University of Liverpool, ; Liverpool, UK
                [6 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [7 ]GRID grid.411347.4, ISNI 0000 0000 9248 5770, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, , Ramón y Cajal Health Research Institute, ; Madrid, Spain
                [8 ]GRID grid.428397.3, ISNI 0000 0004 0385 0924, Singapore General Hospital, , Duke-NUS Medical School, ; Singapore, Singapore
                [9 ]GRID grid.415224.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2150 066X, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [10 ]GRID grid.418080.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2177 7052, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, ; Le Chesnay, France
                [11 ]GRID grid.51462.34, ISNI 0000 0001 2171 9952, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, ; New York, NY USA
                [12 ]GRID grid.275559.9, ISNI 0000 0000 8517 6224, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, , Universitätsklinikum Jena, ; Jena, Germany
                [13 ]GRID grid.414365.1, ISNI 0000 0000 8803 5080, Hospital Angeles Pedregal, ; Mexico City, Mexico
                [14 ]GRID grid.410513.2, ISNI 0000 0000 8800 7493, Pfizer Inc, ; Cambridge, MA USA
                [15 ]GRID grid.418566.8, ISNI 0000 0000 9348 0090, Pfizer Ltd, ; London, UK
                [16 ]GRID grid.476471.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0593 9797, Pfizer Inc, ; Paris, France
                [17 ]GRID grid.424551.3, Pfizer SLU, ; Madrid, Spain
                [18 ]GRID grid.412722.0, ISNI 0000 0004 0515 3663, University of Utah Health Care, ; Salt Lake City, UT USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-3723
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8636-1071
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-515X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4752-0815
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5290-9289
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3238-4494
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2251-4032
                Article
                1589
                10.1038/s41375-022-01589-y
                9252917
                35643868
                2f7c96f5-f982-481f-8990-06f8d579a334
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 12 January 2022
                : 28 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100004319, Pfizer (Pfizer Inc.);
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                randomized controlled trials,haematological cancer
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                randomized controlled trials, haematological cancer

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content287

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors372