29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Bone Mass Increase in Puberty: What Makes It Happen?

      research-article
      Hormone Research in Paediatrics
      S. Karger AG
      Oestrogen, Puberty, Bone development, Bone strength, Muscle strength, Muscle-bone unit

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          It is now thought that the critical property of bone is strength rather than weight, and that control of bone strength is mainly exercised through the effect of the mechanical loads brought to bear on bone. Muscle contraction places the greatest physiological load on bone, and so the strength of bone must be adapted to muscle strength (the functional muscle-bone unit). The Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology [J Hum Biol 1998;10:599–605] provides a model of bone development that describes how bone structure is regulated by local mechanical effects that can be adjusted by the effects of hormones. The DONALD (Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed) study analysed the interaction between the muscle and bone systems in males and females before and during puberty. This study found that differences between the genders in bone adaptation during puberty are at least partly driven by the influence of oestrogen in females. Testosterone seems to have no direct relevant effect on bone during puberty, but may be implicated in the greater amount of muscle mass achieved in boys compared with girls.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bone "mass" and the "mechanostat": a proposal.

          H. Frost (1987)
          The observed fit of bone mass to a healthy animal's typical mechanical usage indicates some mechanism or mechanisms monitor that usage and control the three longitudinal growth, bone modeling, and BMU-based remodeling activities that directly determine bone mass. That mechanism could be named a mechanostat. Accumulated evidence suggests it includes the bone itself, plus mechanisms that transform its mechanical usage into appropriate signals, plus other mechanisms that detect those signals and then direct the above three biologic activities. In vivo studies have shown that bone strains in or above the 1500-3000 microstrain range cause bone modelling to increase cortical bone mass, while strains below the 100-300 microstrain range release BMU-based remodeling which then removes existing cortical-endosteal and trabecular bone. That arrangement provides a dual system in which bone modeling would adapt bone mass to gross overloading, while BMU-based remodeling would adapt bone mass to gross underloading, and the above strain ranges would be the approximate "setpoints" of those responses. The anatomical distribution of those mechanical usage effects are well known. If circulating agents or disease changed the effective setpoints of those responses their bone mass effects should copy the anatomical distribution of the mechanical usage effects. That seems to be the case for many agents and diseases, and several examples are discussed, including postmenopausal osteoporosis, fluoride effects, bone loss in orbit, and osteogenesis imperfecta. The mechanostat proposal is a seminal idea which fits diverse evidence but it requires critique and experimental study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff's law: the bone modeling problem.

            H. Frost (1990)
            From the nature of a bone's endload and its local surface strains, the theory computes a modeling operator, Gamma (gamma), that predicts whether mechanical factors will cause lamellar bone modeling drifts, and where and of what kind. A given mechanical bone strain history then provides a separate modeling rate function, M, to specify the rate of such modeling drifts as fractions of the largest possible ones. Multiplying the two functions, e.g., gamma.M, then predicts mechanically controlled bone modeling responses for cortical and trabecular bone, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The theory correctly predicts each of the 6 known "principal adaptations" of lamellar bone, which provide a critical test of any such theory for this organ. The theory accounts for biologic, biomechanical, and clinical-pathologic knowledge not available in Wolff's time nor accounted for by most biomechanicians since. Existing proven methods can provide all numerical data needed to satisfy the theory's mathematical equations and already suggest provisional values for most of them. Its originator views the theory as the kernel of more and better theories to come rather than a finished work, a kernel that suggests a new and in some respects novel logical framework for analysing the problems, and a kernel that invites critique, refinement, and/or exploitation by others.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's law: the remodeling problem.

              Basic multicellular unit (BMU)-based remodeling of lamellar bone causes bone turnover, net gains and losses of bone on some bone surfaces or "envelopes," and a remodeling space comprising bone temporarily absent due to evolving resorption spaces and incomplete refilling of them by new bone. Those features depend a) on how many new BMU arise annually, b) on how much bone each BMU has resorbed and c) formed upon its completion, and d) on how long the typical BMU takes to become completed. Because a, b, and c have limiting or maximal values in life that direct and/or indirect effects of mechanical usage of the skeleton can change, the theory presented here derives mechanical usage functions that express what fractions of those maxima a given mechanical usage history allows to happen. The theory predicts some changes in bone formation, resorption, balance, turnover, and remodeling space that depend on how remodeling responds to the vigor of a subject's mechanical usage. The theory can predict specific effects of specific mechanical challenges that experiments can test, and it fits abundant published evidence. As the kernel of a new approach to the problem it awaits critique and refinement by others. It plus the 3-way rule can redefine Wolff's law conceptually and also in mathematical and quantifiable form.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                HRE
                Horm Res Paediatr
                10.1159/issn.1663-2818
                Hormone Research in Paediatrics
                S. Karger AG
                978-3-8055-8126-4
                978-3-318-01354-2
                1663-2818
                1663-2826
                2006
                May 2006
                26 May 2006
                : 65
                : Suppl 2
                : 2-10
                Affiliations
                Paediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Children’s Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
                Article
                91748 Horm Res 2006;65:2–10
                10.1159/000091748
                16707903
                2fa4f47d-6b18-4e43-a160-6ba667ac1c77
                © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 7, References: 39, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Paper

                Endocrinology & Diabetes,Neurology,Nutrition & Dietetics,Sexual medicine,Internal medicine,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Bone development,Oestrogen,Muscle-bone unit,Muscle strength,Puberty,Bone strength

                Comments

                Comment on this article