Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing factors associated with long-term work disability after cancer in Belgium: a population-based cohort study using competing risks analysis with a 7-year follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The number of workers with cancer has dramatically increasing worldwide. One of the main priorities is to preserve their quality of life and the sustainability of social security systems. We have carried out this study to assess factors associated with the ability to work after cancer. Such insight should help with the planning of rehabilitation needs and tailored programmes.

          Participants

          We conducted this register-based cohort study using individual data from the Belgian Disability Insurance. Data on 15 543 socially insured Belgian people who entered into the long-term work disability between 2007 and 2011 due to cancer were used.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          We estimated the duration of work disability using Kaplan-Meier and the cause-specific cumulative incidence of ability to work stratified by age, gender, occupational class and year of entering the work disability system for 11 cancer sites using the Fine and Gray model allowing for competing risks.

          Results

          The overall median time of work disability was 1.59 years (95% CI 1.52 to 1.66), ranging from 0.75 to 4.98 years. By the end of follow-up, more than one-third of the disabled cancer survivors were able to work (35%). While a large proportion of the women were able to work at the end of follow-up, the men who were able to work could do so sooner. Being women, white collar, young and having haematological, male genital or breast cancers were factors with the bestlikelihood to be able to return to work.

          Conclusion

          Good prognostic factors for the ability to work were youth, woman, white collar and having breast, male genital or haematological cancers. Reviewing our results together with the cancer incidence predictions up to 2025 offers a high value for social security and rehabilitation planning and for ascertaining patients’ perspectives.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Origins of socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: a review.

          Cancer survival is known to vary by socio-economic group. A review of studies published by 1995 showed this association to be universal and resilient to the many different ways in which socio-economic status was determined. Differences were most commonly attributed to differences in stage of disease at diagnosis. A review of research published since 1995 examining the association of cancer survival with socio-economic variables. An association between socio-economic status and cancer survival has continued to be demonstrated in the last decade of research. Stage at diagnosis and differences in treatment have been cited as the most important explanatory factors. Some research has evaluated the psychosocial elements of this association. Socio-economic differences in cancer survival are now well documented. The explanatory power of stage at diagnosis, although great, should not detract from the evidence of differential treatment between social groups. Neither factor can completely explain the observed socio-economic differences in survival, however, and the importance of differences in tumour and patient factors should now be quantified.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients.

            Cancer patients are 1.4 times more likely to be unemployed than healthy people. Therefore it is important to provide cancer patients with programmes to support the return-to-work (RTW) process. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 1. Aim, background, key concepts, regulations, and current statistics.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2018
                17 February 2018
                : 8
                : 2
                : e014094
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentBelgian Cancer Centre , Scientific Insitute of Public Health , Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ] departmentResearch Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health , Brussels School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ESP-ULB) , Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ] departmentStat-Gent CRESCENDO , University of Ghent , Ghent, Belgium
                [4 ] departmentLandsbond Neutrale Ziekenfondsen (LNZ) , KaMoCo , Antwerpen, Belgium
                [5 ] departmentUnit of Cancer Epidemiology , Scientific Institute of Public Health , Brussels, Belgium
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Régine Levo Kiasuwa Mbengi; regine.kiasuwambengi@ 123456wiv-isp.be
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-8459
                Article
                bmjopen-2016-014094
                10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014094
                5855469
                29455161
                30460c9b-37b5-4eba-9685-1de9bca8d174
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 30 August 2016
                : 17 October 2017
                : 26 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Belgian National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance;
                Categories
                Epidemiology
                Research
                1506
                1692
                655
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                epidemiology,oncology,organisation of health services
                Medicine
                epidemiology, oncology, organisation of health services

                Comments

                Comment on this article