28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-vectored intranasal vaccine for Lyme disease provides long-lasting protection against tick transmitted Borrelia burgdorferi in mice

      Preprint
      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lyme disease (LD) is the most prevalent vector borne disease in North America and Europe and its geographic range continues to expand. Strategies for disease control are necessary to effectively reduce incidence of LD including development of safe vaccines for human use. Parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) vector has an excellent safety record in animals and PIV5-vectored COVID-19 and RSV vaccines are currently under clinical development. We constructed PIV5-vectored LD vaccine candidates expressing OspA from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (OspA B31) and a chimeric protein containing sequences from B. burgdorferi and B. afzelii (OspA BPBPk). Immunogenicity and vaccine efficacy were analyzed in C3H-HeN mice after prime-boost intranasal (IN) vaccination with PIV5-OspA B31 and PIV5-OspA BPBPk, subcutaneous (SC) vaccination with rOspA B31+Alum as well as the respective controls. Mice vaccinated with either PIV5-A B31 or PIV5-A BPBPk intranasally had high endpoint titers of serum antibody against OspA antigen beyond 1 year post vaccination, similar to levels detected in mice vaccinated SC with rOspA B31. Flowcytometric analysis of spleen cells at 9-months post-immunization demonstrated that immunization with the intranasal PIV5 vaccine candidates led to an overall increase in the number of memory B cells, cytotoxic T and cytotoxic effector T cells compared to SC groups. Borreliacidal activity measured by neutralization assay was maintained up to 18 months post-immunization, with the response greater in intranasal PIV5-delivered OspA vaccines, than that induced by SC rOspA B31. Challenge with infected ticks (10-19 strains of B. burgdorferi) performed at 4-, 9- or 15-months post-immunization showed increased breakthrough infections in mice vaccinated with SC rOspA B31 compared to IN PIV5-A B31 or IN PIV5-A BPBPk at 9- and 15-months, as determined by qPCR of B. burgdorferi in tissues, culture of B. burgdorferi from tissues, and antibodies against B. burgdorferi protein VIsE. These data demonstrate that intranasal PIV5-based immunization is superior to parenteral immunization with the same recombinant protein and provides long-lasting protection (> 1 year) against Lyme disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations

          Ever since the development of the first vaccine more than 200 years ago, vaccinations have greatly decreased the burden of infectious diseases worldwide, famously leading to the eradication of small pox and allowing the restriction of diseases such as polio, tetanus, diphtheria, and measles. A multitude of research efforts focuses on the improvement of established and the discovery of new vaccines such as the HPV (human papilloma virus) vaccine in 2006. However, radical changes in the density, age distribution and traveling habits of the population worldwide as well as the changing climate favor the emergence of old and new pathogens that bear the risk of becoming pandemic threats. In recent years, the rapid spread of severe infections such as HIV, SARS, Ebola, and Zika have highlighted the dire need for global preparedness for pandemics, which necessitates the extremely rapid development and comprehensive distribution of vaccines against potentially previously unknown pathogens. What is more, the emergence of antibiotic resistant bacteria calls for new approaches to prevent infections. Given these changes, established methods for the identification of new vaccine candidates are no longer sufficient to ensure global protection. Hence, new vaccine technologies able to achieve rapid development as well as large scale production are of pivotal importance. This review will discuss viral vector and nucleic acid-based vaccines (DNA and mRNA vaccines) as new approaches that might be able to tackle these challenges to global health.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            mRNA vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses of pandemic potential are immunogenic and well tolerated in healthy adults in phase 1 randomized clinical trials

            We evaluated safety and immunogenicity of the first mRNA vaccines against potentially pandemic avian H10N8 and H7N9 influenza viruses.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vaccination against Lyme disease with recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A with adjuvant. Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Group.

              The risk of acquiring Lyme disease is high in areas in which the disease is endemic, and the development of a safe and effective vaccine is therefore important. We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial involving 10,936 subjects who lived in areas of the United States in which Lyme disease is endemic. Participants received an injection of either recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A (OspA) with adjuvant or placebo at enrollment and 1 and 12 months later. In cases of suspected Lyme disease, culture of skin lesions, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, or serologic testing was done. Serologic testing was performed 12 and 20 months after study entry to detect asymptomatic infections. In the first year, after two injections, 22 subjects in the vaccine group and 43 in the placebo group contracted definite Lyme disease (P=0.009); vaccine efficacy was 49 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 69 percent). In the second year, after the third injection, 16 vaccine recipients and 66 placebo recipients contracted definite Lyme disease (P<0.001); vaccine efficacy was 76 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 58 to 86 percent). The efficacy of the vaccine in preventing asymptomatic infection was 83 percent in the first year and 100 percent in the second year. Injection of the vaccine was associated with mild-to-moderate local or systemic reactions lasting a median of three days. Three injections of vaccine prevented most definite cases of Lyme disease or asymptomatic B. burgdorferi infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: concept and designing the experimentsRole: conducted the assaysRole: analyzed the dataRole: wrote the manuscript
                Role: conducted the assaysRole: analyzed the data
                Role: conducted the assays
                Role: conducted the assays
                Role: conducted the assaysRole: analyzed the data
                Role: concept and designing the experimentsRole: secured funding, administered the collaborative project, and supervised personnel
                Role: concept and designing the experimentsRole: analyzed the data
                Journal
                Res Sq
                ResearchSquare
                Research Square
                American Journal Experts
                18 July 2023
                : rs.3.rs-3143132
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
                [2 ]CyanVac, LLC, Athens, GA, USA
                [3 ]Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biochemistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Tennessee, USA
                [4 ]Immuno Technologies, Inc., Memphis, TN, USA
                Author notes
                [a]

                Present address: Merck & Co., West Point, PA, United States

                [# ]Corresponding author: mgomesso@ 123456uthsc.edu
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6456-601X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3715-4543
                Article
                10.21203/rs.3.rs-3143132
                10.21203/rs.3.rs-3143132/v1
                10371166
                37503102
                31373b55-af8b-4926-b869-4c2dd2cfe372

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article