0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current perspectives on the epidemiology and burden of tardive dyskinesia: a focused review of the clinical situation in Japan

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a movement disorder that can develop with the use of dopamine receptor-blocking agents and is most commonly caused by antipsychotics. The use of antipsychotics is expanding, which may lead to an increased number of patients experiencing TD. To summarise the current knowledge of the epidemiology and risk factors for TD in Japan, we reviewed articles related to the current state of knowledge around TD identified through a PubMed search, and held a roundtable discussion of experts in Japan on 9 September 2021 to form the basis of the opinion presented within this review. The true prevalence of TD among patients treated with antipsychotics is not well characterised; it is reported to be between 15% and 50% globally and between 6.5% and 7.7% in Japan. Potential barriers to timely treatment of TD include the stigma surrounding mental health issues and the lack of data regarding TD in Asian patients. This review summarises the current knowledge of the epidemiology, challenges to TD diagnosis and risk factors for TD in Japan. Recent strategies for symptom monitoring and early diagnosis, as well as consensus recommendations are included. Achieving a high level of awareness of TD among physicians who treat patients with psychiatric disorders is of great importance and physicians should ensure that patients with psychiatric disorders receiving antipsychotics are proactively monitored for signs of TD.

          Plain Language Summary

          Plain Language Summary ( In Japanese)

          Visual Summary

          Visual Summary ( In Japanese)

          Related collections

          Most cited references109

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Epidemiology and Burden of Schizophrenia: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016

          Introduction The global burden of disease (GBD) studies have derived detailed and comparable epidemiological and burden of disease estimates for schizophrenia. We report GBD 2016 estimates of schizophrenia prevalence and burden of disease with disaggregation by age, sex, year, and for all countries. Method We conducted a systematic review to identify studies reporting the prevalence, incidence, remission, and/or excess mortality associated with schizophrenia. Reported estimates which met our inclusion criteria were entered into a Bayesian meta-regression tool used in GBD 2016 to derive prevalence for 20 age groups, 7 super-regions, 21 regions, and 195 countries and territories. Burden of disease estimates were derived for acute and residual states of schizophrenia by multiplying the age-, sex-, year-, and location-specific prevalence by 2 disability weights representative of the disability experienced during these states. Findings The systematic review found a total of 129 individual data sources. The global age-standardized point prevalence of schizophrenia in 2016 was estimated to be 0.28% (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 0.24–0.31). No sex differences were observed in prevalence. Age-standardized point prevalence rates did not vary widely across countries or regions. Globally, prevalent cases rose from 13.1 (95% UI: 11.6–14.8) million in 1990 to 20.9 (95% UI: 18.5–23.4) million cases in 2016. Schizophrenia contributes 13.4 (95% UI: 9.9–16.7) million years of life lived with disability to burden of disease globally. Conclusion Although schizophrenia is a low prevalence disorder, the burden of disease is substantial. Our modeling suggests that significant population growth and aging has led to a large and increasing disease burden attributable to schizophrenia, particularly for middle income countries.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Adverse effects of antipsychotic medications.

            The use of antipsychotic medications entails a difficult trade-off between the benefit of alleviating psychotic symptoms and the risk of troubling, sometimes life-shortening adverse effects. There is more variability among specific antipsychotic medications than there is between the first- and second-generation antipsychotic classes. The newer second-generation antipsychotics, especially clozapine and olanzapine, generally tend to cause more problems relating to metabolic syndrome, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Also, as a class, the older first-generation antipsychotics are more likely to be associated with movement disorders, but this is primarily true of medications that bind tightly to dopaminergic neuroreceptors, such as haloperidol, and less true of medications that bind weakly, such as chlorpromazine. Anticholinergic effects are especially prominent with weaker-binding first-generation antipsychotics, as well as with the second-generation antipsychotic clozapine. All antipsychotic medications are associated with an increased likelihood of sedation, sexual dysfunction, postural hypotension, cardiac arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death. Primary care physicians should understand the individual adverse effect profiles of these medications. They should be vigilant for the occurrence of adverse effects, be willing to adjust or change medications as needed (or work with psychiatric colleagues to do so), and be prepared to treat any resulting medical sequelae.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Review article: metoclopramide and tardive dyskinesia.

              Metoclopramide is a dopamine receptor antagonist which has been used for treatment of a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms over the last thirty years. In 2009, the FDA issued a black box warning regarding long-term or high-dose use of this medication because of the risk of developing tardive dyskinesia. To review the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetic properties of metoclopramide, the risk of metoclopramide-induced tardive dyskinesia, potential mechanisms that may alter and to summarize the clinical context for appropriate use of the drug. We conducted a PubMed search using the following key words and combined searches: metoclopramide, neuroleptics, tardive dyskinesia, incidence, prevalence, dopamine, receptors, pharmacokinetic, pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, DRD3 Ser9Gly polymorphism, cytochrome P450, p-glycoprotein, risk factors, gastroparesis, outcome, natural history. Available data show that risk of tardive dyskinesia from metoclopramide use is likely to be <1%, much less than the estimated 1-10% risk previously suggested in national guidelines. Tardive dyskinesia may represent an idiosyncratic response to metoclopramide; pharmacogenetics affect pharmacokinetic and dopamine receptor pharmacodynamics in response to neuroleptic agents that cause similar neurological complications. Community prevalence and pharmacogenetic mechanisms involved in metoclopramide-induced tardive dyskinesia require further study to define the benefit-risk ratio more clearly.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing - original draftRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing - review & editing
                Journal
                Ther Adv Psychopharmacol
                Ther Adv Psychopharmacol
                TPP
                sptpp
                Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2045-1253
                2045-1261
                26 December 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 20451253221139608
                Affiliations
                [1-20451253221139608]Department of Psychiatry, Aichi Medical University, 1-1 Yazako-karimata, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan
                [2-20451253221139608]Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
                [3-20451253221139608]Ongata Psychiatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5066-2390
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-4786
                Article
                10.1177_20451253221139608
                10.1177/20451253221139608
                9806439
                36601351
                32122ef8-e399-4461-a189-0fadb6e91b76
                © The Author(s), 2022

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 23 March 2022
                : 28 October 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100012351;
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2022
                ts1

                antipsychotics,burden,japan,risk factors,schizophrenia,tardive dyskinesia

                Comments

                Comment on this article