7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence of Germline Variants in Prostate Cancer and Implications for Current Genetic Testing Guidelines

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e341">Question</h5> <p id="d3987567e343">What is the germline mutational landscape in unselected patients with prostate cancer, and do guidelines for genetic testing adequately identify patients at risk for aggressive disease? </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e346">Findings</h5> <p id="d3987567e348">This cross-sectional study of 3607 men with a personal history of prostate cancer found that 620 (17.2%) had a pathogenic germline variant, of which 229 (37%) did not qualify (at time of testing) for genetic testing per National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e351">Meaning</h5> <p id="d3987567e353">National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and Gleason scores are not reliable for stratifying patients with prostate cancer for the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants; simplification and expansion of testing guidelines will improve medical management of these patients. </p> </div><p class="first" id="d3987567e356">This cross-sectional study assesses the frequency and distribution of positive germline variants in patients with prostate cancer and evaluates the usefulness of current practice guidelines in recognizing individuals with prostate cancer who would benefit from diagnostic genetic testing. </p><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e360">Importance</h5> <p id="d3987567e362">Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. Although serious, most of these diagnoses are not terminal. Inherited risk for prostate cancer is associated with aggressive disease and poorer outcomes, indicating a critical need for increased genetic screening to identify disease-causing variants that can pinpoint individuals at increased risk for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-5"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e365">Objective</h5> <p id="d3987567e367">To identify positive (pathogenic, likely pathogenic, and increased risk) germline variants in a large prostate cancer cohort and to evaluate the usefulness of current practice guidelines in recognizing individuals at increased risk for prostate cancer who would benefit from diagnostic genetic testing. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-6"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e370">Design, Setting, and Participants</h5> <p id="d3987567e372">Cross-sectional study of data from 3607 men with a personal history of prostate cancer who underwent germline genetic testing between 2013 and 2018 and were unselected for family history, stage of disease, or age at diagnosis. Referral-based testing was performed at a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments/College of American Pathologists–certified diagnostic laboratory. All analysis took place between February 2017 and August 2018. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-7"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e375">Main Outcomes and Measures</h5> <p id="d3987567e377">The frequency and distribution of positive germline variants, and the percentage of individuals with prostate cancer who met National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for germline genetic testing. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-8"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e380">Results</h5> <p id="d3987567e382">Of 3607 men (mean [SD] age at testing, 67 [9.51] years; mean age at diagnosis, 60 [9.05] years) with a personal diagnosis of prostate cancer who were referred for genetic testing, 620 (17.2%) had positive germline variants, of which only 30.7% were variants in <i>BRCA1/2</i>. Positive variants in <i>HOXB13</i>, a gene associated only with prostate cancer risk, were identified in 30 patients (4.5%). DNA mismatch repair variants with substantial known therapeutic implications were detected in 1.74% of variants in the total population tested. Examination of self-reported family histories indicated that 229 individuals (37%) with positive variants in this cohort would not have been approved for genetic testing using the NCCN genetic/familial breast and ovarian guidelines for patients with prostate cancer. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="ab-coi180119-9"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d3987567e391">Conclusions and Relevance</h5> <p id="d3987567e393">Current NCCN guidelines and Gleason scores cannot reliably stratify patients with prostate cancer for the presence or absence of pathogenic germline variants. Most positive genetic test results identified in this study have important management implications for patients and their families, which underscores the need to revisit current guidelines. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Deleterious Germline Mutations in Patients With Apparently Sporadic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

          Purpose Deleterious germline mutations contribute to pancreatic cancer susceptibility and are well documented in families in which multiple members have had pancreatic cancer. Methods To define the prevalence of these germline mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic cancer, we sequenced 32 genes, including known pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes, in DNA prepared from normal tissue obtained from 854 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 288 patients with other pancreatic and periampullary neoplasms, and 51 patients with non-neoplastic diseases who underwent pancreatic resection at Johns Hopkins Hospital between 2000 and 2015. Results Thirty-three (3.9%; 95% CI, 3.0% to 5.8%) of 854 patients with pancreatic cancer had a deleterious germline mutation, 31 (3.5%) of which affected known familial pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes: BRCA2 (12 patients), ATM (10 patients), BRCA1 (3 patients), PALB2 (2 patients), MLH1 (2 patients), CDKN2A (1 patient), and TP53 (1 patient). Patients with these germline mutations were younger than those without (mean ± SD, 60.8 ± 10.6 v 65.1 ± 10.5 years; P = .03). Deleterious germline mutations were also found in BUB1B (1) and BUB3 (1). Only three of these 33 patients had reported a family history of pancreatic cancer, and most did not have a cancer family history to suggest an inherited cancer syndrome. Five (1.7%) of 288 patients with other periampullary neoplasms also had a deleterious germline mutation. Conclusion Germline mutations in pancreatic cancer susceptibility genes are commonly identified in patients with pancreatic cancer without a significant family history of cancer. These deleterious pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene mutations, some of which are therapeutically targetable, will be missed if current family history guidelines are the main criteria used to determine the appropriateness of gene testing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Germline Mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 Distinguish Risk for Lethal and Indolent Prostate Cancer and are Associated with Early Age at Death.

            Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 and ATM have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Systematic Comparison of Traditional and Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Genes in More Than 1000 Patients.

              Gene panels for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment are gaining acceptance, even though the clinical utility of these panels is not yet fully defined. Technical questions remain, however, about the performance and clinical interpretation of gene panels in comparison with traditional tests. We tested 1105 individuals using a 29-gene next-generation sequencing panel and observed 100% analytical concordance with traditional and reference data on >750 comparable variants. These 750 variants included technically challenging classes of sequence and copy number variation that together represent a significant fraction (13.4%) of the pathogenic variants observed. For BRCA1 and BRCA2, we also compared variant interpretations in traditional reports to those produced using only non-proprietary resources and following criteria based on recent (2015) guidelines. We observed 99.8% net report concordance, albeit with a slightly higher variant of uncertain significance rate. In 4.5% of BRCA-negative cases, we uncovered pathogenic variants in other genes, which appear clinically relevant. Previously unseen variants requiring interpretation accumulated rapidly, even after 1000 individuals had been tested. We conclude that next-generation sequencing panel testing can provide results highly comparable to traditional testing and can uncover potentially actionable findings that may be otherwise missed. Challenges remain for the broad adoption of panel tests, some of which will be addressed by the accumulation of large public databases of annotated clinical variants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Oncology
                JAMA Oncol
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                2374-2437
                February 07 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California
                [2 ]Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
                Article
                10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6760
                6459112
                30730552
                32fa0bc3-2bf4-475d-93c2-e5ddad49a4c3
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article