3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Cholecystectomy or Gallbladder In Situ After Endoscopic Sphincterotomy and Bile Duct Stone Removal in Chinese Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & Aims: In patients with stones in their bile ducts and gallbladders, cholecystectomy is generally recommended after endoscopic sphincterotomy and clearance of bile duct stones. However, only approximately 10% of patients with gallbladders left in situ will return with further biliary complications. Expectant management is alternately advocated. In this study, we compared the treatment strategies of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladders left in situ.

          Methods: We randomized patients (>60 years of age) after endoscopic sphincterotomy and clearance of their bile duct stones to receive early laparoscopic cholecystectomy or expectant management. The primary outcome was further biliary complications. Other outcome measures included adverse events after cholecystectomy and late deaths from all causes.

          Results: One hundred seventy-eight patients entered into the trial (89 in each group); 82 of 89 patients who were randomized to receive laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent the procedure. Conversion to open surgery was needed in 16 of 82 patients (20%). Postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (9%). Analysis was by intention to treat. With a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, 6 patients (7%) in the cholecystectomy group returned with further biliary events (cholangitis, n = 5; biliary pain, n = 1). Among those with gallbladders in situ, 21 (24%) returned with further biliary events (cholangitis, n = 13; acute cholecystitis, n = 5; biliary pain, n = 2; and jaundice, n = 1; log rank, P = .001). Late deaths were similar between groups (cholecystectomy, n = 19; gallbladder in situ, n = 11; P = .12).

          Conclusions: In the Chinese, cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones reduces recurrent biliary events and should be recommended.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy.

          Most patients with acute biliary pancreatitis have stones in the biliary tract or ampulla of Vater. Because these stones may be passed spontaneously soon after a patient is admitted to the hospital, the importance of early operative removal is not known. We tested the hypothesis that endoscopic papillotomy within 24 hours of admission decreased the incidence of complications in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis. We studied 195 patients with acute pancreatitis who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 97 patients underwent within 24 hours after admission emergency endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by endoscopic papillotomy for ampullary and common-bile-duct stones, and 98 patients received initial conservative treatment and selective ERCP with or without endoscopic papillotomy only if their condition deteriorated. One hundred twenty-seven patients ultimately proved to have biliary stones. Emergency ERCP with or without endoscopic papillotomy resulted in a reduction in biliary sepsis as compared with conservative treatment (0 of 97 patients vs. 12 of 98 patients, P = 0.001). The decrease in biliary sepsis occurred both in patients predicted to have mild pancreatitis (0 of 56 patients in the group that received emergency ERCP vs. 4 of 58 patients in the conservative-treatment group, P = 0.14) and in patients predicted to have severe pancreatitis (0 of 41 patients vs. 8 of 40 patients, P = 0.008). In all patients who had unrelenting biliary sepsis, persistent ampullary or common-bile-duct stones were identified. There were no major differences in the incidence of local complications (10 patients in the group that received emergency ERCP vs. 12 patients in the conservative-treatment group) or systemic complications (10 patients vs. 14 patients) of acute pancreatitis between the two groups, but the hospital mortality rate was slightly lower in the group undergoing emergency ERCP with or without endoscopic papillotomy (5 patients vs. 9 patients, P = 0.4). Emergency ERCP with or without endoscopic papillotomy is indicated in the treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis.

            Emergency surgery for patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Because recent results suggested that emergency endoscopic drainage could improve the outcome of such patients, we undertook a prospective study to determine the role of this procedure as initial treatment. During a 43-month period, 82 patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis were randomly assigned to undergo surgical decompression of the biliary tract (41 patients) or endoscopic biliary drainage (41 patients), followed by definitive treatment. Hospital mortality was analyzed with respect to the use of endoscopic biliary drainage and other clinical and laboratory findings. Prognostic determinants were studied by linear discriminant analysis. Complications related to biliary tract decompression and subsequent definitive treatment developed in 14 patients treated with endoscopic biliary drainage and 27 treated with surgery (34 vs. 66 percent, P greater than 0.05). The time required for normalization of temperature and stabilization of blood pressure was similar in the two groups, but more patients in the surgery group required ventilatory support. The hospital mortality rate was significantly lower for the patients who underwent endoscopy (4 deaths) than for those treated surgically (13 deaths) (10 vs. 32 percent, P less than 0.03). The presence of concomitant medical problems, a low platelet count, a high serum urea nitrogen concentration, and a low serum albumin concentration before biliary decompression were the other independent determinants of mortality in both groups. Endoscopic biliary drainage is a safe and effective measure for the initial control of severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis and to reduce the mortality associated with the condition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Randomised trial of endoscopic balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bileduct stones.

              Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the removal of bileduct stones is associated with acute complications and a permanent loss of biliary-sphincter function. Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) causes less trauma to the biliary sphincter, but may be less effective in allowing stone removal. 218 consecutive patients with bileduct stones on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were enrolled. 202 who met all eligibility criteria were randomly assigned EST or EBD. The patients were observed in hospital for at least 24 h and followed up at 1 month and 6 months. Complications were classified by an expert panel unaware of treatment allocation and outcome. Analysis was done by intention to treat. After a single ERCP, all stones were removed from 92 (91%) of 101 patients assigned EST and 90 (89%) of 101 assigned EBD (p = 0.81); in nine of the latter, successful removal required additional EST. Mechanical lithotripsy was used to fragment stones in 31 EBD procedures and 13 EST procedures (p < 0.005). Early complications (before 15 days) occurred in 24 EST patients and 17 EBD patients (p = 0.29). One patient died of retroperitoneal perforation after EBD. Four patients had bleeding after EST. Seven patients in each group had pancreatitis. Complications during follow-up occurred in 23 EST patients and 18 EBD patients (p = 0.48). Acute cholecystitis was observed in seven EST patients and one EBD patient (p < 0.05). The success rate of EBD was similar to that of EST. We found there is no evidence of the previously suggested higher risk of pancreatitis with EBD and suggest that EBD is preferred in patients at risk of bleeding after EST. Preservation of biliary-sphincter function after EBD may prevent long-term complications and reduce the risk of acute cholecystitis during follow-up. This procedure is a valuable alternative to EST in patients with bileduct stones.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Gastroenterology
                Gastroenterology
                Gastroenterology
                W.B. Saunders
                0016-5085
                1528-0012
                7 January 2006
                January 2006
                7 January 2006
                : 130
                : 1
                : 96-103
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                []Centre for Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Research, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [§ ]Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
                Author notes
                [* ]Reprint requests: James Y. W. Lau, MD, Department of Surgery, Fourth Floor, Clinical Science Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, 32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China. fax: (852) 2637-7974. laujyw@ 123456surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
                Article
                S0016-5085(05)02056-1
                10.1053/j.gastro.2005.10.015
                7094506
                16401473
                336c5632-e8b6-43b9-9582-035f1f7e960e
                Copyright © 2006 American Gastroenterological Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 18 August 2005
                : 5 October 2005
                Categories
                Article

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                ercp, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

                Comments

                Comment on this article