19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Nature and Extent of Online Marketing by Big Food and Big Alcohol During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Australia: Content Analysis Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Emerging evidence demonstrates that obesity is associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. Excessive alcohol consumption and “comfort eating” as coping mechanisms during times of high stress have been shown to further exacerbate mental and physical ill-health. Global examples suggest that unhealthy food and alcohol brands and companies are using the COVID-19 pandemic to further market their products. However, there has been no systematic, in-depth analysis of how “Big Food” and “Big Alcohol” are capitalizing on the COVID-19 pandemic to market their products and brands.

          Objective

          We aimed to quantify the extent and nature of online marketing by alcohol and unhealthy food and beverage companies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

          Methods

          We conducted a content analysis of all COVID-19-related social media posts made by leading alcohol and unhealthy food and beverage brands (n=42) and their parent companies (n=12) over a 4-month period (February to May 2020) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

          Results

          Nearly 80% of included brands and all parent companies posted content related to COVID-19 during the 4-month period. Quick service restaurants (QSRs), food and alcohol delivery companies, alcohol brands, and bottle shops were the most active in posting COVID-19-related content. The most common themes for COVID-19-related marketing were isolation activities and community support. Promotion of hygiene and home delivery was also common, particularly for QSRs and alcohol and food delivery companies. Parent companies were more likely to post about corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, such as donations of money and products, and to offer health advice.

          Conclusions

          This is the first study to show that Big Food and Big Alcohol are incessantly marketing their products and brands on social media platforms using themes related to COVID-19, such as isolation activities and community support. Parent companies are frequently posting about CSR initiatives, such as donations of money and products, thereby creating a fertile environment to loosen current regulation or resist further industry regulation. “COVID-washing” by large alcohol brands, food and beverage brands, and their parent companies is both common and concerning. The need for comprehensive regulations to restrict unhealthy food and alcohol marketing, as recommended by the World Health Organization, is particularly acute in the COVID-19 context and is urgently required to “build back better” in a post-COVID-19 world.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

          The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor study 2013 (GBD 2013) is the first of a series of annual updates of the GBD. Risk factor quantification, particularly of modifiable risk factors, can help to identify emerging threats to population health and opportunities for prevention. The GBD 2013 provides a timely opportunity to update the comparative risk assessment with new data for exposure, relative risks, and evidence on the appropriate counterfactual risk distribution.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Content Analysis : An Introduction to Its Methodology

            Since the publication of the first edition of Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, the textual fabric in which contemporary society functions has undergone a radical transformation -- namely, the ongoing information revolution. Two decades ago, content analysis was largely known in journalism and communication research, and, to a lesser extent, in the social and psychological sciences. Today, content analysis has become an efficient alternative to public opinion research -- a method of tracking markets, political leanings, and emerging ideas, a way to settle legal disputes, and an approach to explore individual human minds. The Second Edition of Content Analysis is a definitive sourcebook of the history and core principles of content analysis as well as an essential resource for present and future studies. The book introduces readers to ways of analyzing meaningful matter such as texts, images, voices -- that is, data whose physical manifestations are secondary to the meanings that a particular population of people brings to them.Organized into three parts, the book examines the conceptual and methodological aspects of content analysis and also traces several paths through content analysis protocols.The author has completely revised and updated the Second Edition, integrating new information on computer-aided text analysis. The book also includes a practical guide that incorporates experiences in teaching and how to advise academic and commercial researchers. In addition, Krippendorff clarifies the epistemology and logic of content analysis as well as the methods for achieving its aims. Author Klaus Krippendorff discusses three distinguishing characteristics of contemporary content analysis: that it is fundamentally empirically grounded, exploratory in process, and predictive or inferential in intent; that it transcends traditional notions of symbols, contents, and intents; and that it has been forced to develop a methodology of its own, one that enables researchers to plan, execute, communicate, reproduce, and critically evaluate an analysis independent of the desirability of its results.Intended as a textbook for advanced undergraduate and graduate students across the social sciences, Content Analysis, Second Edition will also be a valuable resource for practitioners in a variety of disciplines.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Lifestyle Risk Factors, Inflammatory Mechanisms, and COVID-19 Hospitalization: A Community-Based Cohort Study of 387,109 Adults in UK

              Highlights • The association between lifestyle factors and risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation is unknown. • In this large community-based sample, poorer lifestyle habit and elevated C-reactive protein was associated with greater risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation. • Unhealthy lifestyle behaviours in combination accounted for up to 51% of the population attributable fraction of severe COVID-19. • Low grade inflammation may be an important mechanism. • Adopting simple lifestyle changes could lower the risk of severe COVID-19 infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Public Health Surveill
                JMIR Public Health Surveill
                JPH
                JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2369-2960
                March 2021
                12 March 2021
                12 March 2021
                : 7
                : 3
                : e25202
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Deakin University Geelong Australia, Global Obesity Centre Institute for Health Transformation
                [2 ] School of Communication and Arts The University of Queensland Brisbane Australia
                [3 ] Victorian Health Promotion Foundation Melbourne Australia
                [4 ] Obesity Policy Coalition Melbourne Australia
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Kathryn Backholer kathryn.backholer@ 123456deakin.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-5239
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2647-6934
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6497-2541
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0378-1303
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-2424
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2409-4227
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-3453
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-0928
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9132
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3323-575X
                Article
                v7i3e25202
                10.2196/25202
                7958974
                33709935
                33cffc4f-c7e5-4d4a-bb4b-93a2b16ff7ca
                ©Florentine Martino, Ruby Brooks, Jennifer Browne, Nicholas Carah, Christina Zorbas, Kirstan Corben, Emma Saleeba, Jane Martin, Anna Peeters, Kathryn Backholer. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 12.03.2021.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 21 October 2020
                : 6 November 2020
                : 29 November 2020
                : 16 December 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                alcohol,food and beverage,covid-19,marketing,social media
                alcohol, food and beverage, covid-19, marketing, social media

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content94

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors1,133