0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correction: Incorporating local stakeholders’ voices and knowledge into conservation decisions: a case study on the Chinese Hwamei (Garrulax canorus Linnaeus, 1758) in Taijiang, Guizhou, China

      correction
      1 , 2 ,
      Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Correction to: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2022) 18:63 10.1186/s13002-022-00559-z Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that an incorrect version of Fig. 1 had been provided, in which South China Sea islands had not been presented in the map. The published article has now been updated with the correct version of the figure, and the corrected figure may be found in this erratum. The author thanks you for reading this correction and apologizes for any inconvenience caused. Fig. 1 Map showing the location of the study area. The rural villages surveyed were within the district of Fangzhao town

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Incorporating local stakeholders’ voices and knowledge into conservation decisions: a case study on the Chinese Hwamei ( Garrulax canorus Linnaeus, 1758) in Taijiang, Guizhou, China

          Background The Chinese Hwamei (Garrulax canorus Linnaeus, 1758) is a widely distributed species and has long been kept as a pet, especially by the ethnic communities in Southwest China. According to conservation experts’ suggestions, it has been designated as a second-level national key protected species in February, 2021 to protect this bird, indicating that keeping it at home is no longer permitted in China. However, a key factor to ensure effectiveness and success of conservation initiatives is local stakeholders’ acceptance and support. Methods Interviews and focus group discussions were used to document the policy outcomes and the views of 108 local bird-keepers in a county in Guizhou province. Results Despite awareness about the illegality of the practice, the bird was still commonly caged both in rural and urban regions. To justify their unwillingness to stop keeping these birds, the interviewees presented many arguments, such as benefits for the community members’ health, cultural heritage and contributions to local livelihoods. Fewer than 30% of the bird-keepers believed that the practice of self-keeping has reduced the wild population. Most argued the decline was mainly generated by the harvesting and keepers with monetary interests. They suggested enforcement should target those people and bird markets, as well as the harvesting methods. They also recommended restricting the number of birds allowed to be kept by one keeper, establishing protected areas and a harvesting ban period. The study participants demonstrated considerable local ecological knowledge about approaches for managing the species’ use. Conclusions Due to the benefits for the people and the bird’s large distribution, I argued that a conservation goal to lower the harvesting and keeping rates would be more appropriate than a strict ban on keeping them. Such a policy would be more feasible and culturally acceptable because it is built on keepers’ support and suggestions. It is necessary to monitor the effects of bird keeping on the wild population. Overall, this qualitative study demonstrated the advantage of factoring in local voices in conservation decisions.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            daicy527@163.com
            Journal
            J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
            J Ethnobiol Ethnomed
            Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
            BioMed Central (London )
            1746-4269
            4 November 2022
            4 November 2022
            2022
            : 18
            : 64
            Affiliations
            [1 ]GRID grid.459584.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2196 0260, Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), , Ministry of Education, ; 1 Yanzhong Road, Guilin, 541006 China
            [2 ]GRID grid.459584.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2196 0260, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, , Guangxi Normal University, ; Guilin, 541006 China
            Article
            561
            10.1186/s13002-022-00561-5
            9636660
            36333722
            3449ef2e-c69e-40b9-a90b-3243dc054a12
            © The Author(s) 2022

            Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

            History
            Categories
            Correction
            Custom metadata
            © The Author(s) 2022

            Health & Social care
            Health & Social care

            Comments

            Comment on this article