18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prevalence of and risk factors associated with the presence of Staphylococcus aureus in the chronic wounds of patients treated in primary health care settings in Brazil

      rapid-communication

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract INTRODUCTION: Wounds can be colonized by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: We evaluated the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in the wounds of patients treated at Basic Health Units in Brazil and identified risk factors associated with their presence. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of S. aureus and MRSA were 51.5% and 8.7%, respectively. There was a correlation between the presence of S. aureus in wounds and nostrils (p<0.01). A positive association was detected between S. aureus infection and previous benzylpenicillin use (p=0.02). No associations were observed for MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: Multidrug-resistant pathogens are present in primary healthcare settings in Brazil.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus.

          Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing is important for the identification and definition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones, and for routine purposes, multiplex PCR assays are the most adequate for SCCmec typing. Here, we describe an update to the multiplex PCR strategy for SCCmec typing that we described in 2002 so that SCCmec types IV and V may be properly identified.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Fluoroquinolones and the Risk for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitalized Patients1

            To determine whether fluoroquinolone exposure is a risk factor for the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and whether the effect is different for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) versus methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), we studied two case groups. The first case group included 222 patients with nosocomially acquired MRSA. The second case group included 163 patients with nosocomially acquired MSSA. A total of 343 patients admitted concurrently served as controls. Outcome measures were the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for isolation of MRSA and MSSA after fluoroquinolone exposure. Exposure to both levofloxacin (OR 5.4; p < 0.0001) and ciprofloxacin (OR 2.2; p < 0.003) was associated with isolation of MRSA but not MSSA. After adjustment for multiple variables, both drugs remained risk factors for MRSA (levofloxacin OR 3.4; p < 0.0001; ciprofloxacin OR 2.5; p = 0.005) but not MSSA. Exposure to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin is a significant risk factor for the isolation of MRSA, but not MSSA.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds.

              The quantitative swab culture is a reliable method for quantifying the number of viable bacteria colonizing open wounds. For open wounds in burn patients, the swab bacterial count is linearly related to biopsy quantification of viable bacteria in the underlying tissue. This technique is simple and requires no surgical manipulation of the wound. For a wound of uniform appearance, the standard deviation of a single swab culture from the mean log bacterial count for a series of cultures from widely spaced areas on the wound is +/- 0.85 logs; 95% confidence limits are +/- 1.7 logs from the mean. A Gram-stained smear from a wound swab requires less than 10 minutes to prepare. Visualization of bacteria on the smear indicates that 106 or more bacteria per swab are present. The value of the smear and swab techniques for predicting safe wound closure may be inferred from the published reports of others and the direct relationship between the swab and biopsy counts of viable bacteria for open wounds.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                rsbmt
                Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
                Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop.
                Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT (Uberaba, MG, Brazil )
                0037-8682
                1678-9849
                December 2017
                : 50
                : 6
                : 833-838
                Affiliations
                [1] Botucatu SP orgnameUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho orgdiv1Instituto de Biociências de Botucatu orgdiv2Departamento de Microbiologia e Imunologia Brazil
                [2] Botucatu São Paulo orgnameUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho orgdiv1Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu orgdiv2Departamento de Doenças Tropicais Brazil
                Article
                S0037-86822017000600833
                10.1590/0037-8682-0205-2017
                29340463
                3566349b-1583-4bdd-a8f8-0609c6879121

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 30 May 2017
                : 24 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 15, Pages: 6
                Product

                SciELO Brazil


                S. aureus,Wounds,Primary healthcare
                S. aureus, Wounds, Primary healthcare

                Comments

                Comment on this article