16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Habitat and Vegetation Variables Are Not Enough When Predicting Tick Populations in the Southeastern United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Two tick-borne diseases with expanding case and vector distributions are ehrlichiosis (transmitted by Amblyomma americanum) and rickettiosis (transmitted by A. maculatum and Dermacentor variabilis). There is a critical need to identify the specific habitats where each of these species is likely to be encountered to classify and pinpoint risk areas. Consequently, an in-depth tick prevalence study was conducted on the dominant ticks in the southeast. Vegetation, soil, and remote sensing data were used to test the hypothesis that habitat and vegetation variables can predict tick abundances. No variables were significant predictors of A. americanum adult and nymph tick abundance, and no clustering was evident because this species was found throughout the study area. For A. maculatum adult tick abundance was predicted by NDVI and by the interaction between habitat type and plant diversity; two significant population clusters were identified in a heterogeneous area suitable for quail habitat. For D. variabilis no environmental variables were significant predictors of adult abundance; however, D. variabilis collections clustered in three significant areas best described as agriculture areas with defined edges. This study identified few landscape and vegetation variables associated with tick presence. While some variables were significantly associated with tick populations, the amount of explained variation was not useful for predicting reliably where ticks occur; consequently, additional research that includes multiple sampling seasons and locations throughout the southeast are warranted. This low amount of explained variation may also be due to the use of hosts for dispersal, and potentially to other abiotic and biotic variables. Host species play a large role in the establishment, maintenance, and dispersal of a tick species, as well as the maintenance of disease cycles, dispersal to new areas, and identification of risk areas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Landscape epidemiology of vector-borne diseases.

          Landscape epidemiology describes how the temporal dynamics of host, vector, and pathogen populations interact spatially within a permissive environment to enable transmission. The spatially defined focus, or nidus, of transmission may be characterized by vegetation as well as by climate, latitude, elevation, and geology. The ecological complexity, dimensions, and temporal stability of the nidus are determined largely by pathogen natural history and vector bionomics. Host populations, transmission efficiency, and therefore pathogen amplification vary spatially, thereby creating a heterogeneous surface that may be defined by remote sensing and statistical tools. The current review describes the evolution of landscape epidemiology as a science and exemplifies selected aspects by contrasting the ecology of two different recent disease outbreaks in North America caused by West Nile virus, an explosive, highly virulent mosquito-borne virus producing ephemeral nidi, and Borrelia burgdorferi, a slowly amplifying chronic pathogen producing semipermanent nidi.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pictorial key to the adults of hard ticks, family Ixodidae (Ixodida: Ixodoidea), east of the Mississippi River.

            Six genera and 27 species of hard ticks (Ixodidae) currently are recognized in the United States east of the Mississippi River as follows: Amblyomma (4 species), Boophilus (1), Dermacentor (3), Haemaphysalis (2), Ixodes (16), and Rhipicephalus (1). We present a diagrammatic couplet key to the adults of the six genera and 27 species of Ixodidae found in the eastern portion of the United States.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting the Risk of Lyme Disease: Habitat Suitability for Ixodes scapularis in the North Central United States

              The distribution and abundance of Ixodes scapularis were studied in Wisconsin, northern Illinois, and portions of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan by inspecting small mammals for ticks and by collecting questing ticks at 138 locations in state parks and natural areas. Environmental data were gathered at a local level (i.e., micro and meso levels), and a geographic information system (GIS) was used with several digitized coverages of environmental data to create a habitat profile for each site and a grid map for Wisconsin and Illinois. Results showed that the presence and abundance of I. scapularis varied, even when the host population was adequate. Tick presence was positively associated with deciduous, dry to mesic forests and alfisol-type soils of sandy or loam-sand textures overlying sedimentary rock. Tick absence was associated with grasslands, conifer forests, wet to wet/mesic forests, acidic soils of low fertility and a clay soil texture, and Precambrian bedrock. We performed a discriminant analysis to determine environmental differences between positive and negative tick sites and a regression equation to examine the probability of I. scapularis presence per grid. Both analyses indicated that soil order and land cover were the dominant contributors to tick presence. We then constructed a risk map indicating suitable habitats within areas where I. scapularis is already established. The risk map also shows areas of high probability the tick will become established if introduced. Thus, this risk analysis has both explanatory power and predictive capability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                11 December 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 12
                : e0144092
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Biology, Christian Brothers University, 650 East Parkway South, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Biology, Rhodes College, 2000 North Parkway, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
                [5 ]Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [6 ]Department of Biosystems Engineering and Soil Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [7 ]Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America
                [8 ]Department of Biology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America
                University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: RTTF AEH. Performed the experiments: RTTF JEM MDC YK SRJP SMS AO MK AEH. Analyzed the data: RTTF JEM MDC YK AO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RTTF JEM MDC YK SRJP SMS AO MK AEH. Wrote the paper: RTTF JEM MDC YK AH. provided preliminary data for the experiments: RTTF, MDC, MK, and AH.

                Article
                PONE-D-15-37688
                10.1371/journal.pone.0144092
                4676690
                26656122
                357293d5-e906-4b61-810e-a315a6226cf5
                © 2015 Trout Fryxell et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 26 August 2015
                : 12 November 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 5, Pages: 17
                Funding
                This project was funded by the University of Tennessee and the Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Ames Plantation Research and Education Center, Mellon Foundation, Rhodes College, as well as AKC Canine Health Foundation (01864-A) and USDA Tennessee Hatch Project (TEN00433).
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information file.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article